IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i3p514-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling feeding processes in bivalves: A mechanistic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Saraiva, S.
  • van der Meer, J.
  • Kooijman, S.A.L.M.
  • Sousa, T.

Abstract

Many bivalves species inhabit coastal waters where fluctuations in both quantity and quality of suspended particulate matter occur. The study of interactions between the organism and its environment requires thus a certain level of detail concerning the feeding process, not only from the bivalve point of view – which material can they actually use as food – but also from the ecosystem point of view – to what extent are bivalves able to clear the water column and change ecosystem dynamics? However such detail is commonly neglected in ecosystem modelling and a mechanistic description of the feeding process is still lacking. In this study, the Synthesizing Units concept, part of the Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory, is used to describe the main feeding processes in bivalves. Filtration, ingestion and assimilation are assumed as three different steps and pseudofaeces production computed as the difference between filtered and ingested fluxes. Generic formulations are proposed and discussed, considering several types of food, with type-specific ingestion and assimilation efficiencies. The model performance is evaluated by comparison with the literature data for the blue mussel for a wide range of experimental conditions. The lack of data and of detailed information on the experimental setups adds some uncertainty to the parameters estimation. Nevertheless, the model results are in good agreement with observations. The model has the desired flexibility to be implemented as an extension to the standard DEB model, to simulate bivalve growth in estuaries and coastal areas where the organisms experience different food quantity and quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Saraiva, S. & van der Meer, J. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M. & Sousa, T., 2011. "Modelling feeding processes in bivalves: A mechanistic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 514-523.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:514-523
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010005181
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filgueira, Ramón & Chica, Manuel & Palacios, Juan José & Strohmeier, Tore & Lavaud, Romain & Agüera, Antonio & Damas, Sergio & Strand, Øivind, 2020. "Embracing multimodal optimization to enhance Dynamic Energy Budget parameterization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    2. Saraiva, S. & Fernandes, L. & van der Meer, J. & Neves, R. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2017. "The role of bivalves in the Balgzand: First steps on an integrated modelling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 34-48.
    3. Lavaud, Romain & La Peyre, Megan K. & Casas, Sandra M. & Bacher, Cédric & La Peyre, Jérôme F., 2017. "Integrating the effects of salinity on the physiology of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in the northern Gulf of Mexico through a Dynamic Energy Budget model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 221-233.
    4. Montagnes, David J.S. & Fenton, Andy, 2012. "Prey-abundance affects zooplankton assimilation efficiency and the outcome of biogeochemical models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 1-7.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:514-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.