IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v356y2017icp127-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated ecohydrological modeling approach to exploring the dynamic interaction between groundwater and phreatophytes

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xi
  • Zheng, Yi
  • Sun, Zan
  • Tian, Yong
  • Zheng, Chunmiao
  • Liu, Jie
  • Liu, Shaomin
  • Xu, Ziwei

Abstract

Phreatophytes play an important role in maintaining the ecological services in arid and semi-arid areas. Characterizing the interaction between groundwater and phreatophytes is critical for the land and water management in such areas but has rarely been attempted via integrated ecohydrological modeling. In this study, a plant growth model was developed and coupled with a soil water dynamics model (Hydrus-1D) to explore the groundwater dependence of Populus euphratica, a rare, ancient and endangered phreatophytic species. The integrated ecohydroloigcal model was validated with observational data collected from the Heihe River Basin (northwest China). The groundwater dependence was also investigated at larger scales using remote sensing data and regional hydrological modeling. The major study findings include the following: (1) the ecohydrological behaviors and groundwater dependence of P. euphratica can be well explained by the existing theories; (2) groundwater is the dominant water source for P. euphratica during its growing season, and groundwater subsidy can be an intuitive measure of the water-shortage risk for P. euphratica, which is conditioned on root depth, the water-holding capacity of the soil, and groundwater depth; and (3) at large spatial and temporal scales, the impact of groundwater depth on P. euphratica growth is also discernable. A groundwater depth of 1–3.5m appears to be the optimal depth range for P. euphratica growth in the study area. Overall, this study demonstrates how multi-source and multi-scale data can be effectively fused through an integrated modeling approach to generate a coherent understanding of the ecohydrological processes of phreatophytes.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xi & Zheng, Yi & Sun, Zan & Tian, Yong & Zheng, Chunmiao & Liu, Jie & Liu, Shaomin & Xu, Ziwei, 2017. "An integrated ecohydrological modeling approach to exploring the dynamic interaction between groundwater and phreatophytes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 127-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:127-140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.04.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016306731
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.04.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Pannell, David J., 1997. "Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 139-152, May.
    3. Richard G. Pearson & Steven J. Phillips & Michael M. Loranty & Pieter S. A. Beck & Theodoros Damoulas & Sarah J. Knight & Scott J. Goetz, 2013. "Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 673-677, July.
    4. Wu, Xin & Zheng, Yi & Wu, Bin & Tian, Yong & Han, Feng & Zheng, Chunmiao, 2016. "Optimizing conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater for irrigation to address human-nature water conflicts: A surrogate modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 380-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Xinlei & Liu, Shaomin & Xu, Tongren & Yu, Kailiang & Gentine, Pierre & Zhang, Zhe & Xu, Ziwei & Jiao, Dandan & Wu, Dongxing, 2022. "Improving predictions of evapotranspiration by integrating multi-source observations and land surface model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madan K. Jha & Richard C. Peralta & Sasmita Sahoo, 2020. "Simulation-Optimization for Conjunctive Water Resources Management and Optimal Crop Planning in Kushabhadra-Bhargavi River Delta of Eastern India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Yanlan Liu & William J. Riley & Trevor F. Keenan & Zelalem A. Mekonnen & Jennifer A. Holm & Qing Zhu & Margaret S. Torn, 2022. "Dispersal and fire limit Arctic shrub expansion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    4. Kopke, Emma & Kingwell, Ross S. & Young, John, 2005. "A farm-level economic assessment of the Australian Merino, Dohne Merino, and South African Meat Merino sheep breeds in southern Australia," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137934, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Guthrie, R. & Purse, Kevin & Lurie, P., 2006. "Workers' Compensation Western Australia; a Case Study 1993 - 2004," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(1), pages 62-73.
    6. Emile Noël, 1996. "Quelques réflexions sur les perspectives politico-institutionnelles de l'intégration européenne en 2000 et au-delà," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 39, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    7. Karin Fierke & Antje Wiener, 1999. "Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    8. Leslie Holmes, 1997. "The Democratic State or State Democracy? Problems of Post-Communist Transition," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 48, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Mustajoki, Jyri & Hamalainen, Raimo P. & Lindstedt, Mats R.K., 2006. "Using intervals for global sensitivity and worst-case analyses in multiattribute value trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 278-292, October.
    10. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    11. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    12. Rodriguez Iglesias, 1996. "Le pouvoir judiciaire de la Communauté européenne au stade actuel de l'évolution de l'Union," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 41, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    13. Bennett, Anne L. & Pannell, David J., 1998. "Economic evaluation of a weed-activated sprayer for herbicide application to patchy weed populations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    14. Jacqueline Oehri & Gabriela Schaepman-Strub & Jin-Soo Kim & Raleigh Grysko & Heather Kropp & Inge Grünberg & Vitalii Zemlianskii & Oliver Sonnentag & Eugénie S. Euskirchen & Merin Reji Chacko & Giovan, 2022. "Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Seyedeh Hadis Moghadam & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2022. "Optimal Water Allocation of Surface and Ground Water Resources Under Climate Change with WEAP and IWOA Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3181-3205, July.
    16. Stephen P. Chambal & Jeffery D. Weir & Yucel R. Kahraman & Alex J. Gutman, 2011. "A Practical Procedure for Customizable One-Way Sensitivity Analysis in Additive Value Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 303-321, December.
    17. Pannell, David J., 2004. "Effectively communicating economics to policy makers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 1-21.
    18. Abbie A. Rogers & Fiona L. Dempster & Jacob I. Hawkins & Robert J. Johnston & Peter C. Boxall & John Rolfe & Marit E. Kragt & Michael P. Burton & David J. Pannell, 2019. "Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1131-1161, November.
    19. Andre Liebich, 1998. "Ethnic Minorities and Long-Term Implications of EU Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 49, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    20. David K Swanson, 2015. "Environmental Limits of Tall Shrubs in Alaska’s Arctic National Parks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-34, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:356:y:2017:i:c:p:127-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.