IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v342y2016icp113-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-organizing maps for analysing pest profiles: Sensitivity analysis of weights and ranks

Author

Listed:
  • Roigé, Mariona
  • Parry, Matthew
  • Phillips, Craig
  • Worner, Susan

Abstract

Self organizing maps for pest profile analysis (SOM PPA) is a quantitative filtering tool aimed to assist pest risk analysis. The main SOM PPA outputs used by risk analysts are species weights and species ranks. We investigated the sensitivity of SOM PPA to changes in input data. Variations in SOM PPA species weights and ranks were examined by creating datasets of different sizes and running numerous SOM PPA analyses. The results showed that species ranks are much less influenced by variations in dataset size than species weights. The results showed SOM PPA should be suitable for studying small datasets restricted to only a few species. Also, the results indicated that minor data pre-processing is needed before analyses, which has the dual benefits of reducing analysis time and modeller-induced bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Roigé, Mariona & Parry, Matthew & Phillips, Craig & Worner, Susan, 2016. "Self-organizing maps for analysing pest profiles: Sensitivity analysis of weights and ranks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 113-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:342:y:2016:i:c:p:113-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016305191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean R. Paini & Susan P. Worner & David C. Cook & Paul J. De Barro & Matthew B. Thomas, 2010. "Threat of invasive pests from within national borders," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Watts, Michael J. & Worner, S.P., 2009. "Estimating the risk of insect species invasion: Kohonen self-organising maps versus k-means clustering," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 821-829.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xubin Pan & Jingqiu Zhang & Han Xu & Xianglin Zhang & Wei Zhang & Huahai Song & Shuifang Zhu, 2015. "Spatial similarity in the distribution of invasive alien plants and animals in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(3), pages 1751-1764, July.
    2. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Hervé, Bisseleua D.B. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Salifu, Daisy & Subramanian, Sevgan & Ngowi, Valentine B. & Guimapi, Ritter Y.A. & Anani, Bruce & Kakmeni, Francois M.M. & Aff, 2017. "Advances in crop insect modelling methods—Towards a whole system approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 88-103.
    3. Robert C. Cope & Joshua V. Ross & Talia A. Wittmann & Michael J. Watts & Phillip Cassey, 2019. "Predicting the Risk of Biological Invasions Using Environmental Similarity and Transport Network Connectedness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 35-53, January.
    4. Louise Morin & Dean R Paini & Roderick P Randall, 2013. "Can Global Weed Assemblages Be Used to Predict Future Weeds?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:342:y:2016:i:c:p:113-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.