IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v318y2015icp126-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying and exploring a new modeling approach of functional connectivity regarding ecological network: A case study on the dynamic lines of space syntax

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Tianxiang
  • Jing, Dong
  • Wang, Shoubing

Abstract

The construction of ecological network or other continuous habitat is essential for urban eco-system; however, to quantify the heterogeneous functional connectivity for eco-network is academically attractive and challenging. The dynamic lines of space syntax, tenable to simulate perception and navigation flows in network-configured human settlements, is introduced to inspire idea and approach to modeling connectivity in eco-network, while the classical graphic notions and variables are assumed functional to new relationship between other species and eco-network. After mapping continuous functional components among land layout into free space and then into dynamic lines that influence bio-flows, the paper conducts an exploration on functional connectivity of Singapore's green network. Conclusions involves the distribution heterogeneity of basic variables, Connectivity, Control, Mean Depth and Integration, demonstrating each meaning for functional connectivity in the network, with a step-wise Integration further comparing the connectivity patterns under different behavioral ranges. Moreover, a scale robustness determined via linear regression between Integration and Connectivity reveals network functionality as behavioral scale varying. The analogical modeling of space syntax raised in this paper is adaptive and instructive, particularly if original essential traits remain valid between the substituted species and space, because several principles and characteristics of conventional connectivity models can be logically inherited, while the graphic notions of dynamic line shares unique advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Tianxiang & Jing, Dong & Wang, Shoubing, 2015. "Applying and exploring a new modeling approach of functional connectivity regarding ecological network: A case study on the dynamic lines of space syntax," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 126-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:318:y:2015:i:c:p:126-137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014005882
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Berger-Tal & Tal Polak & Aya Oron & Yael Lubin & Burt P. Kotler & David Saltz, 2011. "Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 236-239.
    2. Su, Meirong & Fath, Brian D. & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Liu, Gengyuan, 2013. "Ecosystem health pattern analysis of urban clusters based on emergy synthesis: Results and implication for management," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 600-613.
    3. Guy Pe'er & Klaus Henle & Claudia Dislich & Karin Frank, 2011. "Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Pe’er, Guy & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2008. "Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 73-85.
    5. Haythorne, Sean & Skabar, Andrew, 2013. "An improved pattern-guided evolution approach for the development of adaptive individual-based ecological models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 72-82.
    6. Shanthala Devi, B.S. & Murthy, M.S.R. & Debnath, Bijan & Jha, C.S., 2013. "Forest patch connectivity diagnostics and prioritization using graph theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 279-287.
    7. Vincenot, Christian Ernest & Giannino, Francesco & Rietkerk, Max & Moriya, Kazuyuki & Mazzoleni, Stefano, 2011. "Theoretical considerations on the combined use of System Dynamics and individual-based modeling in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 210-218.
    8. Bodin, Örjan & Saura, Santiago, 2010. "Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2393-2405.
    9. Driezen, Kassandra & Adriaensen, Frank & Rondinini, Carlo & Doncaster, C. Patrick & Matthysen, Erik, 2007. "Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 314-322.
    10. Foltête, J.C. & Berthier, K. & Cosson, J.F., 2008. "Cost distance defined by a topological function of landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 104-114.
    11. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Baird, Dan, 2013. "Dependence of network metrics on model aggregation and throughflow calculations: Demonstration using the Sylt–Rømø Bight Ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 214-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinghu Pan & Yimin Wang & Zhao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Optimization of Ecological Network in Arid Inland River Basin Using MSPA and Spatial Syntax: A Case Study of Shule River Basin, NW China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2018. "Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, January.
    3. Yunfei Peng & Jing Qian & Fu Ren & Wenhui Zhang & Qingyun Du, 2016. "Sustainability of Land Use Promoted by Construction-to-Ecological Land Conversion: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine A. Zeller & David W. Wattles & Javan M. Bauder & Stephen DeStefano, 2020. "Forecasting Seasonal Habitat Connectivity in a Developing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Almpanidou, Vasiliki & Mazaris, Antonios D. & Mertzanis, Yorgos & Avraam, Ioannis & Antoniou, Ioannis & Pantis, John D. & Sgardelis, Stefanos P., 2014. "Providing insights on habitat connectivity for male brown bears: A combination of habitat suitability and landscape graph-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 37-44.
    3. Koenig, Shantel J. & Bender, Darren J., 2018. "Increasing the function in distance-based functional connectivity assessments: a modified spatial interaction model (SIM) approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 47-58.
    4. Bo Mu & Guohang Tian & Gengyu Xin & Miao Hu & Panpan Yang & Yiwen Wang & Hao Xie & Audrey L. Mayer & Yali Zhang, 2021. "Measuring Dynamic Changes in the Spatial Pattern and Connectivity of Surface Waters Based on Landscape and Graph Metrics: A Case Study of Henan Province in Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Imron, Muhammad Ali & Gergs, Andre & Berger, Uta, 2012. "Structure and sensitivity analysis of individual-based predator–prey models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 71-81.
    7. Lewe, J.-H. & Hivin, L.F. & Mavris, D.N., 2014. "A multi-paradigm approach to system dynamics modeling of intercity transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 188-202.
    8. Wang, Xueqi & Liu, Gengyuan & Coscieme, Luca & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Hao, Yan & Zhang, Yan & Brown, Mark T., 2019. "Study on the emergy-based thermodynamic geography of the Jing-Jin-Ji region: Combined multivariate statistical data with DMSP-OLS nighttime lights data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Roy, Arijit & Bhattacharya, Sudeepto & Ramprakash, M. & Senthil Kumar, A., 2016. "Modelling critical patches of connectivity for invasive Maling bamboo (Yushania maling) in Darjeeling Himalayas using graph theoretic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 77-85.
    10. Jennifer B Tennessen & Marla M Holt & Brianna M Wright & M Bradley Hanson & Candice K Emmons & Deborah A Giles & Jeffrey T Hogan & Sheila J Thornton & Volker B Deecke, 2023. "Divergent foraging strategies between populations of sympatric matrilineal killer whales," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 373-386.
    11. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    12. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    14. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.
    15. Upadhyay, Shashankaditya & Roy, Arijit & Ramprakash, M. & Idiculla, Jobin & Kumar, A. Senthil & Bhattacharya, Sudeepto, 2017. "A network theoretic study of ecological connectivity in Western Himalayas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 246-257.
    16. Juliana Menger & William E Magnusson & Marti J Anderson & Martin Schlegel & Guy Pe’er & Klaus Henle, 2017. "Environmental characteristics drive variation in Amazonian understorey bird assemblages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Zhicong Zhao & Pei Wang & Xiaoshan Wang & Fangyi Wang & Tz-Hsuan Tseng & Yue Cao & Shuyu Hou & Jiayuan Peng & Rui Yang, 2022. "A Protected Area Connectivity Evaluation and Strategy Development Framework for Post-2020 Biodiversity Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Qianjin Dong & Xu Zhang & Yalin Chen & Debin Fang, 2019. "Dynamic Management of a Water Resources-Socioeconomic-Environmental System Based on Feedbacks Using System Dynamics," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 2093-2108, April.
    19. Yael Lehnardt & Bob Bm Wong & Oded Berger-Tal & Leigh Simmons, 2019. "Intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise through long-term monitoring: a comment on Harding et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1514-1515.
    20. Melia G. Nafus & Jennifer M. Germano & Jeanette A. Perry & Brian D. Todd & Allyson Walsh & Ronald R. Swaisgood, 2015. "Hiding in plain sight: a study on camouflage and habitat selection in a slow-moving desert herbivore," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1389-1394.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:318:y:2015:i:c:p:126-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.