IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v293y2014icp128-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food-web topology of Ukrainian mountain grasslands: Comparative properties and relations to ecosystem parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Buzhdygan, O.Y.
  • Rudenko, S.S.
  • Patten, B.C.
  • Kostyshyn, S.S.

Abstract

An important question in ecology is whether the food-web structure and ecosystem functions are related. This paper provide an empirical evidence for the food-web complexity–ecosystem properties relationships using the comparative analysis of food webs in seven mountain pastoral grasslands located in the Carpathian Mountain area of the Chernivtsi Region, Ukraine. Biomass of plant functional groups; grazing intensity; richness of different functional groups of the soil microorganisms; and geographical location of the study grasslands are observed ecosystem properties. Trophic networks consisting of N food and feeding categories (nodes, compartments) joined by L food transfers (links) were constructed for each studied pasture and the following network measures of their graph characteristics (“topology”) determined: food-web size (N), number of links (L), link density (LD=L/N), and connectance (C=L/N2). Also the number of trophic classes and size of each trophic class are incorporated as the properties of the food-web architecture. Our data reveal that increase in species richness and food-web complexity increases the biomass of forbs within the study grasslands. Grazing intensity shows negative but statistically insignificant correlation with network measures. Our findings also reveal the longitudinal changes in connectance variation across the study food webs. It shows that temperature and elevation changes may also contribute toward the food-web connectance variation within the study area. Overall, our findings report plants to be the defining in network architecture. Furthermore grazing-susceptible plants show to be the driving variable in a food-web structure of the study grasslands. Our findings also reveal new aspects in behavioral patterns of food-web properties in relation to each other. Our data report link density to be the most sensitive parameter in relation to the other food-web measures. In contrast, connectance shows the least sensitivity to all other network measures, but the most sensitivity to the observed ecosystem parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Buzhdygan, O.Y. & Rudenko, S.S. & Patten, B.C. & Kostyshyn, S.S., 2014. "Food-web topology of Ukrainian mountain grasslands: Comparative properties and relations to ecosystem parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 128-138.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:293:y:2014:i:c:p:128-138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014002403
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Patten, Bernard C. & Kazanci, Caner & Ma, Qianqian & Rudenko, Svitlana S., 2012. "Dynamical and system-wide properties of linear flow-quantified food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 176-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Systems ecology and environmentalism: Getting the science right. Part II: The Janus Enigma Hypothesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 101-138.
    2. Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "The cardinal hypotheses of Holoecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 63-111.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buzhdygan, Oksana Y. & Rudenko, Svitlana S. & Kazanci, Caner & Patten, Bernard C., 2016. "Effect of invasive black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on nitrogen cycle in floodplain ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 170-177.
    2. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    3. Patten, Bernard C., 2015. "Link tracking: Quantifying network flows from qualitative node–link digraphs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 47-58.
    4. Xu, Wanying & Zhou, Chuanbin & Cao, Aixin & Luo, Min, 2016. "Understanding the mechanism of food waste management by using stakeholder analysis and social network model: An industrial ecology perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 63-72.
    5. Burns, Thomas P. & Rose, Kenneth A. & Brenkert, Antoinette L., 2014. "Quantifying direct and indirect effects of perturbations using model ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 69-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:293:y:2014:i:c:p:128-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.