IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v276y2014icp23-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the 3/4-exponent von Bertalanffy equation for ontogenetic growth

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Pei-Jian
  • Ishikawa, Tetsuroh
  • Sandhu, Hardev S.
  • Hui, Cang
  • Chakraborty, Amit
  • Jin, Xian-Shi
  • Tachihara, Katsunori
  • Li, Bai-Lian

Abstract

The von Bertalanffy equation has been widely used to describe the ontogenetic growth of animals. Recently a new ontogenetic growth model (OGM) was proposed based on allometric scaling and has gained very good attention from the readers. Mathematically speaking, this model is a special case of von Bertalanffy equation with a scaling exponent (α) being 3/4. This new OGM has been criticized on several grounds, such as contradicting the law of energy conservation. Its generality has also been questioned as it fits poorly to the growth of many crop species. Moreover, fish growth fits the von Bertalanffy equation better when α=2/3 rather than when α=3/4. Here, we fit the von Bertalanffy equation with α=2/3 or 3/4 or unknown, and also the logistic equation, to the body length data of three freshwater fish species. This allows us to test: (i) how the choice of the scaling exponent α in the von Bertalanffy equation affects its performance, and (ii) whether the logistic equation provides a better fit than the von Bertalanffy equation for fish growth, as already demonstrated for crop growth. Results showed that the OGM (α=3/4) fitted better than unknown α or α=2/3 in the von Bertalanffy equation but worse than the logistic equation. When choosing α values between 1/2 and 1, we found that increasing the value of α could improve the goodness-of-fit but potentially lead to overfitting and unreliable estimates of model parameters. This suggests that there is no universal value of α for different species or taxa. Use of 2/3 or 3/4 value for the scaling exponent α in the von Bertalanffy equation should be carefully decided based on observed relationships between metabolic rate and body weight, and not merely based on the goodness-of-fit. As a rule of thumb, the logistic equation is still the best model for describing the ontogenetic growth of animals and plants. Future research should be aimed at clarifying the potential linkages between the logistic equation and the metabolic theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Pei-Jian & Ishikawa, Tetsuroh & Sandhu, Hardev S. & Hui, Cang & Chakraborty, Amit & Jin, Xian-Shi & Tachihara, Katsunori & Li, Bai-Lian, 2014. "On the 3/4-exponent von Bertalanffy equation for ontogenetic growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 23-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:276:y:2014:i:c:p:23-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014000052
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Pei-Jian & Men, Xing-Yuan & Sandhu, Hardev S. & Chakraborty, Amit & Li, Bai-Lian & Ou-Yang, Fang & Sun, Yu-Cheng & Ge, Feng, 2013. "The “general” ontogenetic growth model is inapplicable to crop growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Jayanth R. Banavar & John Damuth & Amos Maritan & Andrea Rinaldo, 2002. "Modelling universality and scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6916), pages 626-626, December.
    3. Geoffrey B. West & James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist, 2001. "A general model for ontogenetic growth," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6856), pages 628-631, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng, Qiang & Chen, Long & Niklas, Karl J. & Yao, Weihao & Lian, Meng & Shi, Peijian, 2023. "Comparison of three sigmoidal functions describing the leaf growth of Camptotheca acuminata Decne," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Pei-Jian & Men, Xing-Yuan & Sandhu, Hardev S. & Chakraborty, Amit & Li, Bai-Lian & Ou-Yang, Fang & Sun, Yu-Cheng & Ge, Feng, 2013. "The “general” ontogenetic growth model is inapplicable to crop growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Witting, Lars, 2017. "The natural selection of metabolism and mass selects allometric transitions from prokaryotes to mammals," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 23-42.
    3. Barberis, L. & Condat, C.A., 2012. "Describing interactive growth using vector universalities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 56-63.
    4. Sigourney, Douglas B. & Munch, Stephan B. & Letcher, Benjamin H., 2012. "Combining a Bayesian nonparametric method with a hierarchical framework to estimate individual and temporal variation in growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 125-134.
    5. Mayu Sugiyama & Takashi Saitou & Hiroshi Kurokawa & Asako Sakaue-Sawano & Takeshi Imamura & Atsushi Miyawaki & Tadahiro Iimura, 2014. "Live Imaging-Based Model Selection Reveals Periodic Regulation of the Stochastic G1/S Phase Transition in Vertebrate Axial Development," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Carl-Johan Dalgaard & Holger Strulik, 2014. "Physiological Constraints and Comparative Economic Development," Discussion Papers 14-21, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    7. Carl-Johan Dalgaard & Holger Strulik, 2015. "The physiological foundations of the wealth of nations," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-73, March.
    8. Ribeiro, Fabiano L. & Ribeiro, Kayo N., 2015. "A one dimensional model of population growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 434(C), pages 201-210.
    9. Norbert Brunner & Manfred Kühleitner & Werner Georg Nowak & Katharina Renner-Martin & Klaus Scheicher, 2019. "Comparing growth patterns of three species: Similarities and differences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-9, October.
    10. Giacomini, Henrique C. & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Trexler, Joel C. & Petrere, Miguel, 2013. "Trait contributions to fish community assembly emerge from trophic interactions in an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 32-43.
    11. Carey W. King, 2021. "Interdependence of Growth, Structure, Size and Resource Consumption During an Economic Growth Cycle," Papers 2106.02512, arXiv.org.
    12. Santiago Campos-Barreiro & Jesús López-Fidalgo, 2015. "D-optimal experimental designs for a growth model applied to a Holstein-Friesian dairy farm," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 491-505, September.
    13. Carl-Johan Dalgaard & Casper Worm Hansen & Holger Strulik, 2017. "Accounting for Fetal Origins: Health Capital vs. Health Deficits," Discussion Papers 17-11, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    14. Carl‐Johan Dalgaard & Holger Strulik, 2016. "Physiology and Development: Why the West is Taller Than the Rest," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(598), pages 2292-2323, December.
    15. Sébastien Benzekry & Clare Lamont & Afshin Beheshti & Amanda Tracz & John M L Ebos & Lynn Hlatky & Philip Hahnfeldt, 2014. "Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Tao, Yong & Lin, Li & Wang, Hanjie & Hou, Chen, 2023. "Superlinear growth and the fossil fuel energy sustainability dilemma: Evidence from six continents," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 39-51.
    17. Lang, Wei & Long, Ying & Chen, Tingting & Li, Xun, 2019. "Reinvestigating China’s urbanization through the lens of allometric scaling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 1429-1439.
    18. Hendriks, A. Jan, 2007. "The power of size: A meta-analysis reveals consistency of allometric regressions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 196-208.
    19. Annette Baudisch, 2009. "How ageing is shaped by trade-offs," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-043, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    20. Akihiro Manabe & Takashi Yamakawa & Shuhei Ohnishi & Tatsuro Akamine & Yoji Narimatsu & Hiroshige Tanaka & Tetsuichiro Funamoto & Yuji Ueda & Takeo Yamamoto, 2018. "A novel growth function incorporating the effects of reproductive energy allocation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:276:y:2014:i:c:p:23-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.