IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v258y2013icp74-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactions at large spatial scale: The case of Centris bees and floral oil producing plants in South America

Author

Listed:
  • Giannini, T.C.
  • Pinto, C.E.
  • Acosta, A.L.
  • Taniguchi, M.
  • Saraiva, A.M.
  • Alves-dos-Santos, I.

Abstract

Abiotic features and biogeography have been suggested as influencing factors for large-scale species distribution, but little is known about the role of interactions. Aiming to understand how the environmental variables and floral morphology shape the large-scale spatial pattern of species distribution and how this is reflected in the interactions, we analyzed the oil-collecting Centris bee species and the floral oil producing plants in South America. We surveyed the academic literature to build a matrix of interactions and Internet data providers for a dataset of occurrence points of Centris bee species and oil plants with which the bees have been observed. We grouped the interacting bee–plant species according to the two types of floral oil producing gland (epithelial and trichomatic elaiophores) and performed a Cluster Analysis using the averages of climatic and topographic variables to determine the climate similarity among the occurrence areas of each group of bee–plant interacting species. We estimate the significant differences among the climatic conditions in the occurrence areas of the clusters. We identified a distributional pattern of plant–bee interactions that is associated with abiotic factors, especially precipitation, in the occurrence areas. Areas with higher precipitation presented the highest number of species; also, the bee species were associated to plants with epithelial elaiophore and the interactions were more generalized (many partners). In the areas with lower precipitation, we found few species; the interactive plant species include the botanical families that have flowers with trichomatic elaiophores and the interactions were more specialized (few partners). In addition, in these latter areas Centris and their interacting plant are phylogenetically related. The distributional pattern of interactions between Centris bees and floral oil producing plants in South America is related to current ecological processes, mainly precipitation, but also to past evolutionary history.

Suggested Citation

  • Giannini, T.C. & Pinto, C.E. & Acosta, A.L. & Taniguchi, M. & Saraiva, A.M. & Alves-dos-Santos, I., 2013. "Interactions at large spatial scale: The case of Centris bees and floral oil producing plants in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 74-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:258:y:2013:i:c:p:74-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013001506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kallimanis, A.S. & Petanidou, T. & Tzanopoulos, J. & Pantis, J.D. & Sgardelis, S.P., 2009. "Do plant–pollinator interaction networks result from stochastic processes?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 684-693.
    2. Banas, Neil S., 2011. "Adding complex trophic interactions to a size-spectral plankton model: Emergent diversity patterns and limits on predictability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2663-2675.
    3. Meineri, Eric & Skarpaas, Olav & Vandvik, Vigdis, 2012. "Modeling alpine plant distributions at the landscape scale: Do biotic interactions matter?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Seppelt, Ralf & Müller, Felix & Schröder, Boris & Volk, Martin, 2009. "Challenges of simulating complex environmental systems at the landscape scale: A controversial dialogue between two cups of espresso," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3481-3489.
    5. González-Salazar, Constantino & Stephens, Christopher R. & Marquet, Pablo A., 2013. "Comparing the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic factors as mediators of species’ distributions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 57-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silva, Daniel P. & Gonzalez, Victor H. & Melo, Gabriel A.R. & Lucia, Mariano & Alvarez, Leopoldo J. & De Marco, Paulo, 2014. "Seeking the flowers for the bees: Integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 200-209.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín, Gerardo & Yáñez-Arenas, Carlos & Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier, 2022. "Discrepancies between point process models and environmental envelopes identify the niche centroid – geography configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    2. Silva, Daniel P. & Gonzalez, Victor H. & Melo, Gabriel A.R. & Lucia, Mariano & Alvarez, Leopoldo J. & De Marco, Paulo, 2014. "Seeking the flowers for the bees: Integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 200-209.
    3. Shanning Lou & Jiao Ning & Cheng Zhang & Chunmei Wang & Wanhe Zhu & Shenghua Chang & Fujiang Hou, 2021. "Multi-Scale Evaluation of Dominant Factors (MSDF) on Forage: An Ecosystemic Method to Understand the Function of Forage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Langhammer, Maria & Thober, Jule & Lange, Martin & Frank, Karin & Grimm, Volker, 2019. "Agricultural landscape generators for simulation models: A review of existing solutions and an outline of future directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 135-151.
    5. Müller, Birgit & Schulze, Jule & Kreuer, David & Linstädter, Anja & Frank, Karin, 2015. "How to avoid unsustainable side effects of managing climate risk in drylands — The supplementary feeding controversy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 153-165.
    6. Cleo Maria Gaganis & Andreas Y. Troumbis & Themistoklis Kontos, 2024. "Leveraging Reed Bed Burnings as Indicators of Wetland Conversion in Modern Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Stock, Michiel & Piot, Niels & Vanbesien, Sarah & Vaissière, Bernard & Coiffait-Gombault, Clémentine & Smagghe, Guy & De Baets, Bernard, 2020. "Information content in pollination network reveals missing interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    8. Moscoso, Jordyn E. & Bianchi, Daniele & Stewart, Andrew L., 2022. "Controls and characteristics of biomass quantization in size-structured planktonic ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    9. John, Felix & Toth, Russell & Frank, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Müller, Birgit, 2019. "Ecological Vulnerability Through Insurance? Potential Unintended Consequences of Livestock Drought Insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 357-368.
    10. Holloway, Paul & Miller, Jennifer A., 2017. "A quantitative synthesis of the movement concepts used within species distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 91-103.
    11. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schmid, Erwin & Muhar, Andreas, 2011. "Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 122-134, February.
    12. Su, Bei & Pahlow, Markus & Prowe, A. E. Friederike, 2018. "The role of microzooplankton trophic interactions in modelling a suite of mesocosm ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 169-179.
    13. Siehoff, Silvana & Lennartz, Gottfried & Heilburg, Ira C. & Roß-Nickoll, Martina & Ratte, Hans Toni & Preuss, Thomas G., 2011. "Process-based modeling of grassland dynamics built on ecological indicator values for land use," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(23), pages 3854-3868.
    14. Record, N.R. & Pershing, A.J. & Maps, F., 2013. "Emergent copepod communities in an adaptive trait-structured model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 260(C), pages 11-24.
    15. An, Li, 2012. "Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 25-36.
    16. García-Valdés, Raúl & Gotelli, Nicholas J. & Zavala, Miguel A. & Purves, Drew W. & Araújo, Miguel B., 2015. "Effects of climate, species interactions, and dispersal on decadal colonization and extinction rates of Iberian tree species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 118-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:258:y:2013:i:c:p:74-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.