IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i3p419-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer functional responses under intra- and inter-specific interference competition

Author

Listed:
  • de Villemereuil, Pierre B.
  • López-Sepulcre, Andrés

Abstract

Mechanistic models of population, community and ecosystem dynamics require the mathematical description of trophic interactions in the form of functional response equations. There is a wealth of such equations developed to incorporate the effects of multitude forms of foraging behaviour including intra-specific interference competition. However, there has been no attempt to include inter-specific behaviours beyond the obvious consumer–resource relationship, and thus, mechanistic models of communities and ecosystems remain limited in their incorporation of individual behaviour. In this paper we extend existing functional response models to account for both intra- and inter-specific interference behaviours. Together with response surface experiments, these can be used to investigate the role of both types of interference for a given species’ resource acquisition efficiency. We illustrate this with data from foraging trials of guppies Poecilia reticulata in the presence and absence of a competitor species, Hart's killifish Rivulus hartii. Our results show that in the studied example, intra-specific interference is important and stronger than inter-specific competition.

Suggested Citation

  • de Villemereuil, Pierre B. & López-Sepulcre, Andrés, 2011. "Consumer functional responses under intra- and inter-specific interference competition," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 419-426.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:419-426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010005521
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Křivan, Vlastimil & Cressman, Ross & Schneider, Candace, 2008. "The ideal free distribution: A review and synthesis of the game-theoretic perspective," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 403-425.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruzzone, Octavio A. & Logarzo, Guillermo A. & Aguirre, María B. & Virla, Eduardo G., 2018. "Intra-host interspecific larval parasitoid competition solved using modelling and bayesian statistics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 114-123.
    2. Ruiz Sebastián, Carlos & McClanahan, Timothy R., 2013. "Description and validation of production processes in the coral reef ecosystem model CAFFEE (Coral–Algae–Fish-Fisheries Ecosystem Energetics) with a fisheries closure and climatic disturbance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 326-348.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frølich, Emil F. & Thygesen, Uffe H., 2022. "Solving multispecies population games in continuous space and time," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 36-45.
    2. Yong-Chao Su & Cheng-Yu Wu & Cheng-Hong Yang & Bo-Sheng Li & Sin-Hua Moi & Yu-Da Lin, 2021. "Machine Learning Data Imputation and Prediction of Foraging Group Size in a Kleptoparasitic Spider," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Rowell, Jonathan T., 2009. "The limitation of species range: A consequence of searching along resource gradients," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 216-227.
    4. Bell, Adrian V. & Rader, Russell B. & Peck, Steven L. & Sih, Andrew, 2009. "The positive effects of negative interactions: Can avoidance of competitors or predators increase resource sampling by prey?," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 52-58.
    5. Mark Broom & Jan Rychtář, 2018. "Ideal Cost-Free Distributions in Structured Populations for General Payoff Functions," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92, March.
    6. Jack W. Bradbury & Sandra L. Vehrencamp & Kenneth E. Clifton, 2015. "The ideal free antelope: foraging dispersions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1303-1313.
    7. van Leeuwen, E. & Jansen, V.A.A., 2010. "Evolutionary consequences of a search image," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 49-55.
    8. Revilla, Tomás A. & Křivan, Vlastimil, 2022. "Prey–predator dynamics with adaptive protection mutualism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    9. Varga, Tamás & Garay, József & Rychtář, Jan & Broom, Mark, 2020. "A temporal model of territorial defence with antagonistic interactions," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 15-35.
    10. Mullon, Christian & Nagurney, Anna, 2012. "A game theoretical approach to the vertical coexistence of small and big fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 41-48.
    11. Menezes, Jorge F.S. & Kotler, Burt P., 2019. "The generalized ideal free distribution model: Merging current ideal free distribution models into a central framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 47-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:419-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.