IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v221y2010i16p1852-1864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameterising competing zooplankton for survival in plankton functional type models

Author

Listed:
  • Cropp, Roger
  • Norbury, John

Abstract

Marine plankton ecosystems are an important component of biogeochemical cycling in the oceans. Operational plankton functional type (PFT) models, that group plankton according to their biogeochemical properties, are currently being developed to resolve biogenic gas exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, and to model the lowest trophic levels in fisheries models. A fundamental problem with these models is that PFTs often go extinct in computer simulations, effectively removing the biogeochemical processes from the models. Cropp and Norbury [Cropp, R., Norbury, J., 2009a. Parameterizing plankton functional type models: insights from a dynamical systems perspective. J. Plankton Res. 31, 939–963] demonstrated that parameter combinations that allowed all PFTs to stay extant for all time in stable, homogeneous environments were rare in a PFT model with two competing phytoplankton and one zooplankton (NP1P2Z). In this paper, we examine the dynamical properties of a generic predator–predator–prey PFT model, and apply the analysis techniques developed by Cropp and Norbury to a simple example PFT model with one phytoplankton and two zooplankton (NPZ1Z2) in order to explore its properties and parameter space. We find that the properties of predator–predator–prey PFT systems are fundamentally different from those of predator–prey–prey PFT systems. The likelihood of parameter combinations for which all PFTs stay extant for all time in predator–predator–prey PFT systems depends critically on the process formulations used, and the properties of co-existing zooplankton (as defined by their parameter values) are quite different to those of co-existing phytoplankton.

Suggested Citation

  • Cropp, Roger & Norbury, John, 2010. "Parameterising competing zooplankton for survival in plankton functional type models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1852-1864.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:16:p:1852-1864
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.05.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010002437
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.05.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitra, Aditee, 2009. "Are closure terms appropriate or necessary descriptors of zooplankton loss in nutrient–phytoplankton–zooplankton type models?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 611-620.
    2. Jef Huisman & Franz J. Weissing, 1999. "Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6760), pages 407-410, November.
    3. Cropp, Roger & Norbury, John, 2009. "Simple predator–prey interactions control dynamics in a plankton food web model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(13), pages 1552-1565.
    4. Kevin McCann & Alan Hastings & Gary R. Huxel, 1998. "Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6704), pages 794-798, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sailley, S.F. & Vogt, M. & Doney, S.C. & Aita, M.N. & Bopp, L. & Buitenhuis, E.T. & Hashioka, T. & Lima, I. & Le Quéré, C. & Yamanaka, Y., 2013. "Comparing food web structures and dynamics across a suite of global marine ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 261, pages 43-57.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rashleigh, Brenda & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2007. "Conditions for coexistence of freshwater mussel species via partitioning of fish host resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 171-178.
    2. Pavão, D.C. & Elias, R.B. & Silva, L., 2019. "Comparison of discrete and continuum community models: Insights from numerical ecology and Bayesian methods applied to Azorean plant communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 93-106.
    3. Sergey Bartsev & Andrey Degermendzhi, 2023. "The Evolutionary Mechanism of Formation of Biosphere Closure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Dai, Chuanjun & Zhao, Min & Chen, Lansun, 2012. "Complex dynamic behavior of three-species ecological model with impulse perturbations and seasonal disturbances," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-97.
    5. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3182-3193.
    8. Anna Y. Alekseeva & Anneloes E. Groenenboom & Eddy J. Smid & Sijmen E. Schoustra, 2021. "Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbial Communities from Spontaneous Fermented Foods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Yacine, Youssef & Loeuille, Nicolas, 2022. "Stable coexistence in plant-pollinator-herbivore communities requires balanced mutualistic vs antagonistic interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    10. Hairong Lin & Chunhua Wang & Fei Yu & Jingru Sun & Sichun Du & Zekun Deng & Quanli Deng, 2023. "A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. López-Ruiz, Ricardo & Fournier-Prunaret, Danièle, 2009. "Periodic and chaotic events in a discrete model of logistic type for the competitive interaction of two species," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 334-347.
    12. Torres-Alruiz, Maria Daniela & Rodríguez, Diego J., 2013. "A topo-dynamical perspective to evaluate indirect interactions in trophic webs: New indexes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 363-369.
    13. Sudakov, Ivan & Vakulenko, Sergey A. & Bruun, John T., 2022. "Stochastic physics of species extinctions in a large population," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    14. Yan, Chuan & Zhang, Zhibin, 2018. "Dome-shaped transition between positive and negative interactions maintains higher persistence and biomass in more complex ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 14-21.
    15. Wang, Shuran Cindy & Liu, Xueqin & Liu, Yong & Wang, Hongzhu, 2020. "Benthic-pelagic coupling in lake energetic food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    16. Rose, Kenneth A. & Sable, Shaye & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Yurek, Simeon & Trexler, Joel C. & Graf, William & Reed, Denise J., 2015. "Proposed best modeling practices for assessing the effects of ecosystem restoration on fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 12-29.
    17. Silverman, B. David, 2007. "Modeling the effect of growth rate and survivability trade-offs on species coexistence and spatial topology at a traveling invasive wave-front," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 454-464.
    18. Zhang, Chongliang & Chen, Yong & Ren, Yiping, 2016. "The efficacy of fisheries closure in rebuilding depleted stocks: Lessons from size-spectrum modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 59-66.
    19. Priyadarshi, Anupam & Chandra, Ram & Kishi, Michio J. & Smith, S.Lan & Yamazaki, Hidekatsu, 2022. "Understanding plankton ecosystem dynamics under realistic micro-scale variability requires modeling at least three trophic levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    20. Šajna, Nina & Kušar, Primož, 2014. "Modeling species fitness in competitive environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 31-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:16:p:1852-1864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.