IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i2p133-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating forest succession models

Author

Listed:
  • Didion, M.
  • Kupferschmid, A.D.
  • Lexer, M.J.
  • Rammer, W.
  • Seidl, R.
  • Bugmann, H.

Abstract

Forest gap models have been applied widely to examine forest development under natural conditions and to investigate the effect of climate change on forest succession. Due to the complexity and parameter requirements of such models a rigorous evaluation is required to build confidence in the simulation results. However, appropriate data for model assessment are scarce at the large spatial and temporal scales of successional dynamics. In this study, we explore a data source for the evaluation of forest gap models that has been used only little in the past, i.e., large-scale National Forest Inventory data. The key objectives of this study were (a) to examine the potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating the performance of forest gap models and (b) to test two particular models as case studies to derive recommendations for their future improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Didion, M. & Kupferschmid, A.D. & Lexer, M.J. & Rammer, W. & Seidl, R. & Bugmann, H., 2009. "Potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating forest succession models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 133-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:2:p:133-147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008004626
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larocque, Guy R. & Archambault, Louis & Delisle, Claude, 2011. "Development of the gap model ZELIG-CFS to predict the dynamics of North American mixed forest types with complex structures," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2570-2583.
    2. M. Didion & A. Kupferschmid & A. Wolf & H. Bugmann, 2011. "Ungulate herbivory modifies the effects of climate change on mountain forests," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 647-669, December.
    3. Irauschek, Florian & Barka, Ivan & Bugmann, Harald & Courbaud, Benoit & Elkin, Che & Hlásny, Tomáš & Klopcic, Matija & Mina, Marco & Rammer, Werner & Lexer, Manfred J, 2021. "Evaluating five forest models using multi-decadal inventory data from mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    4. Matejicek, Lubos & Vavrova, Eva & Cudlin, Pavel, 2011. "Spatio-temporal modelling of ground vegetation development in mountain spruce forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2584-2592.
    5. Langner, Alexandra & Irauschek, Florian & Perez, Susana & Pardos, Marta & Zlatanov, Tzvetan & Öhman, Karin & Nordström, Eva-Maria & Lexer, Manfred J., 2017. "Value-based ecosystem service trade-offs in multi-objective management in European mountain forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 245-257.
    6. Jianwei W. Zhang & William W. Oliver & Russell T. Graham & W. Keith Moser, 2020. "The Level-of-Growing-Stock (LOGS) study on thinning ponderosa pine forests in the US West: A long-term collaborative experiment in density management," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(10), pages 393-406.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:2:p:133-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.