IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i24p3546-3554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A phenomenological model without dispersal kernel to model species migration

Author

Listed:
  • Saltré, F.
  • Chuine, I.
  • Brewer, S.
  • Gaucherel, C.

Abstract

Phenomenological approaches to model species migration are usually based on kernel-based methods. These methods require a good knowledge of the dispersal agent behaviour for a given species. They also calculate the location of individuals independently to each other (except the mother plant) and then suppress some of them according to additional interactions such as competition, facilitation and recruitment. In this paper, we propose to use a new phenomenological method, the Gibbs method, to model tree species migration at large scale. The Gibbs method handles the location of adult individuals in terms of pairwise interactions described by a potential function. This function summarizes the set of known and unknown factors determining the spatial distribution of the individuals (or cohorts). The principle of the Gibbs method is to minimize the sum of all pairwise interactions, also called the cost function, in order to optimize the spatial point pattern according to the chosen potential function.

Suggested Citation

  • Saltré, F. & Chuine, I. & Brewer, S. & Gaucherel, C., 2009. "A phenomenological model without dispersal kernel to model species migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3546-3554.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:24:p:3546-3554
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009004098
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. J. Baddeley & J. Møller & R. Waagepetersen, 2000. "Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 54(3), pages 329-350, November.
    2. James S. Clark & Jason S. McLachlan, 2003. "Stability of forest biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6940), pages 635-638, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kateřina Koňasová & Jiří Dvořák, 2021. "Stochastic Reconstruction for Inhomogeneous Point Patterns," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 527-547, June.
    2. Redenbach, Claudia & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "Parameter estimation for growth interaction processes using spatio-temporal information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 672-683.
    3. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    4. Giuseppe Arbia & Patrizia Cella & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani, 2015. "A micro spatial analysis of firm demography: the case of food stores in the area of Trento (Italy)," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 923-937, May.
    5. Ondřej Šedivý & Antti Penttinen, 2014. "Intensity estimation for inhomogeneous Gibbs point process with covariates-dependent chemical activity," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(3), pages 225-249, August.
    6. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    7. Tilman M. Davies & Martin L. Hazelton, 2013. "Assessing minimum contrast parameter estimation for spatial and spatiotemporal log‐Gaussian Cox processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 355-389, November.
    8. Yongtao Guan & Hansheng Wang, 2010. "Sufficient dimension reduction for spatial point processes directed by Gaussian random fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 367-387, June.
    9. Tomáš Mrkvička & Ilya Molchanov, 2005. "Optimisation of linear unbiased intensity estimators for point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 57(1), pages 71-81, March.
    10. Jean-François Coeurjolly & Jesper Møller & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2017. "A Tutorial on Palm Distributions for Spatial Point Processes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 404-420, December.
    11. C. Comas & F. J. Rodriguez-Cortes & J. Mateu, 2015. "Second-order analysis of anisotropic spatiotemporal point process data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(1), pages 49-66, February.
    12. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2009. "Generalizing Ripley's K function to inhomogeneous populations," Working Papers halshs-00372631, HAL.
    13. Mohammad Ghorbani & Ottmar Cronie & Jorge Mateu & Jun Yu, 2021. "Functional marked point processes: a natural structure to unify spatio-temporal frameworks and to analyse dependent functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 529-568, September.
    14. P. J. Diggle & V. Gómez-Rubio & P. E. Brown & A. G. Chetwynd & S. Gooding, 2007. "Second-Order Analysis of Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes Using Case–Control Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 550-557, June.
    15. Giada Adelfio & Frederic Schoenberg, 2009. "Point process diagnostics based on weighted second-order statistics and their asymptotic properties," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(4), pages 929-948, December.
    16. Arbia, Giuseppe & Espa, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Diego & Mazzitelli, Andrea, 2010. "Detecting the existence of space-time clustering of firms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 311-323, September.
    17. Jalilian, Abdollah, 2016. "On the higher order product density functions of a Neyman–Scott cluster point process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 144-150.
    18. Yongtao Guan, 2008. "Variance estimation for statistics computed from inhomogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 175-190, February.
    19. Jesper Møller & Håkon Toftaker, 2014. "Geometric Anisotropic Spatial Point Pattern Analysis and Cox Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(2), pages 414-435, June.
    20. Jiří Dvořák & Michaela Prokešová, 2016. "Parameter Estimation for Inhomogeneous Space-Time Shot-Noise Cox Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(4), pages 939-961, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:24:p:3546-3554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.