IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v215y2008i4p301-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction ability and sensitivity of artificial intelligence-based habitat preference models for predicting spatial distribution of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)

Author

Listed:
  • Fukuda, Shinji
  • Hiramatsu, Kazuaki

Abstract

The present study compared prediction ability, transferability and sensitivity of the three artificial intelligence (AI) based models of fuzzy neural network (FNN), fuzzy habitat preference model (FHPM), and patterns of preference level (PPL), and one conventional model of habitat suitability index (HSI) in predicting spatial distribution of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) dwelling in agricultural canals in Japan. Through the analyses, characteristics and applicability of these models were clarified. Based on field surveys, two independent sets of data were prepared; one was for calibration and the other was for validation. The models were first developed and tested by using the calibration data and then the transferability was verified by the validation data. All the models except for HSI were developed under 50 different initial conditions. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis was carried out to all the models in order to compare the model structure and to show how different data sets may affect the result of habitat prediction among the models, in which different levels of perturbations were given to input data. As a result, all the AI-based models appeared to have better prediction ability than the conventional model of HSI but lacked transferability. Among all, FNN was found to have the best predictive power despite of the high sensitivity which reflects the differences in its model structure under different initial conditions. FHPM appeared to have the best description in habitat preference as appeared as good convergence in preference curves among the AI-based models. PPL showed better prediction than FHPM in calibration but worse in validation and larger variances in model structure, resulting in deviation in sensitivity. HSI represented qualitatively the same habitat preference as the other models of FHPM and PPL, of which uniform habitat preference curves in a certain habitat category appeared as low sensitivity. The present result supports the use of AI techniques and their hybridization in predicting spatial distribution of the fish. Consequently, it is also suggested to take into consideration the mathematical characteristics of the habitat preference models, since they play the most important role in habitat evaluation and prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Fukuda, Shinji & Hiramatsu, Kazuaki, 2008. "Prediction ability and sensitivity of artificial intelligence-based habitat preference models for predicting spatial distribution of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(4), pages 301-313.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:4:p:301-313
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008001786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kemp, Stanley J. & Zaradic, Patricia & Hansen, Frank, 2007. "An approach for determining relative input parameter importance and significance in artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 326-334.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fukuda, Shinji, 2009. "Consideration of fuzziness: Is it necessary in modelling fish habitat preference of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 2877-2884.
    2. Yi, Yujun & Cheng, Xi & Yang, Zhifeng & Wieprecht, Silke & Zhang, Shanghong & Wu, Yingjie, 2017. "Evaluating the ecological influence of hydraulic projects: A review of aquatic habitat suitability models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 748-762.
    3. Fukuda, Shinji & De Baets, Bernard & Mouton, Ans M. & Waegeman, Willem & Nakajima, Jun & Mukai, Takahiko & Hiramatsu, Kazuaki & Onikura, Norio, 2011. "Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1401-1413.
    4. Mocq, J. & St-Hilaire, A. & Cunjak, R.A., 2013. "Assessment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) habitat quality and its uncertainty using a multiple-expert fuzzy model applied to the Romaine River (Canada)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 14-25.
    5. Gobeyn, Sacha & Mouton, Ans M. & Cord, Anna F. & Kaim, Andrea & Volk, Martin & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2019. "Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 179-195.
    6. Febrina, Rina & Sekine, Masahiko & Noguchi, Hiroyuki & Yamamoto, Koichi & Kanno, Ariyo & Higuchi, Takaya & Imai, Tsuyoshi, 2015. "Modeling the preference of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis) for underwater sounds to determine the migration path in a river," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 299(C), pages 102-113.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marijana Zekić-Sušac & Marinela Knežević & Rudolf Scitovski, 2021. "Modeling the cost of energy in public sector buildings by linear regression and deep learning," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 307-322, March.
    2. Shengshi Wang & Lianyong Zuo & Miao Li & Qiao Wang & Xizhen Xue & Qicong Liu & Shuai Jiang & Jian Wang & Xitong Duan, 2021. "The Data-Driven Modeling of Pressure Loss in Multi-Batch Refined Oil Pipelines with Drag Reducer Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Muñoz-Mas, R. & Martínez-Capel, F. & Alcaraz-Hernández, J.D. & Mouton, A.M., 2015. "Can multilayer perceptron ensembles model the ecological niche of freshwater fish species?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 72-81.
    4. Nasrin, Sharmin & Bunker, Jonathan, 2024. "Gender equality through sustainable transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-79.
    5. Fischer, Andreas, 2015. "How to determine the unique contributions of input-variables to the nonlinear regression function of a multilayer perceptron," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 60-63.
    6. Namazi, Mohammad & Shokrolahi, Ahmad & Sadeghzadeh Maharluie, Mohammad, 2016. "Detecting and ranking cash flow risk factors via artificial neural networks technique," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1801-1806.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:4:p:301-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.