IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v93y2013icp278-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of consumer preferences for rarity on the harvest of wild populations within a species

Author

Listed:
  • Lyons, Jessica A.
  • Natusch, Daniel J.D.

Abstract

Economic theory predicts that exploitation of a species alone is unlikely to result in extinction because of escalating costs involved in finding increasingly rare individuals of a declining species. However, a recently proposed hypothesis, the Anthropogenic Allee Effect (AAE), proposes that if people place disproportionate value on rare species, this may result in a cycle whereby increased exploitation reduces the population size, thus increasing its value and ultimately leading to its extinction in the wild. We tested this hypothesis using data collected on wild harvests, preferences of pet keepers and sale prices of different populations of green pythons (Morelia viridis) and hypothesized that the AAE could occur among population within species, not just between them. The rarity of populations of green pythons was strongly positively correlated with price and negatively correlated with harvest levels. The two populations that were deemed most desirable by pet collectors exhibited abnormal coloration and were found to be suffering from the effects of over-exploitation for the pet trade. Adequate regulation and enforcement are needed to reduce the effects of demand on illegal harvesting and conservationists and government bodies should be aware of the effects of disclosing the rarity of a species and its populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyons, Jessica A. & Natusch, Daniel J.D., 2013. "Effects of consumer preferences for rarity on the harvest of wild populations within a species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 278-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:278-283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800913002000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Nijman & Chris R Shepherd, 2011. "The Role of Thailand in the International Trade in CITES-Listed Live Reptiles and Amphibians," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Elena Angulo & Franck Courchamp, 2009. "Rare Species Are Valued Big Time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-5, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Hinsley & D. W. S. Challender & S. Masters & D. W. Macdonald & E. J. Milner-Gulland & J. Fraser & J. Wright, 2024. "Early warning of trends in commercial wildlife trade through novel machine-learning analysis of patent filing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vall-llosera, Miquel & Cassey, Phillip, 2017. "Physical attractiveness, constraints to the trade and handling requirements drive the variation in species availability in the Australian cagebird trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 407-413.
    2. Arbieu, Ugo & Grünewald, Claudia & Martín-López, Berta & Schleuning, Matthias & Böhning-Gaese, Katrin, 2018. "Large mammal diversity matters for wildlife tourism in Southern African Protected Areas: Insights for management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 481-490.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:278-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.