IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v205y2023ics0921800922003871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Catch Portfolios in Characterizing Species' Economic Linkages and Fishers' Responses to Climate Change Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Vasquez Caballero, Smit
  • Salgueiro-Otero, Diego
  • Ojea, Elena

Abstract

The collective harvest behavior of fishers, as revealed by their catch portfolios, gives rise to an economic linkage among targeted species. Mapping the economic connectivity among species helps identify species that may play a role in fishers’ adaptive capacity to climate change impacts. In this study, we used survey data and network analysis to map the connectivity among species harvested by small-scale Galician fishers holding the same set of fishing permits. We characterized species by describing their roles in the system of connected species via four network centrality measures: degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector. We used connectivity metrics in a discrete choice framework to evaluate the relation between species roles and fishers' species choices under a hypothetical climate change impact. In particular, we asked the following question: Which species are likely to be added to a catch portfolio in response to a climate-driven negative impact on fishing returns? Galician fishers responded to hypothetical scenarios by adding species not central to the network and species that are likely to be located within clusters in the network and by diversifying their portfolios of permits. Our work suggests that species connectivity due to fishers' behavior deserves serious consideration for practitioners who seek to improve institutional arrangements that promote the resilience of small-scale fisheries.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasquez Caballero, Smit & Salgueiro-Otero, Diego & Ojea, Elena, 2023. "The Role of Catch Portfolios in Characterizing Species' Economic Linkages and Fishers' Responses to Climate Change Impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:205:y:2023:i:c:s0921800922003871
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800922003871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larcker, David F. & So, Eric C. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2013. "Boardroom centrality and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 225-250.
    2. Quentin Grafton, R., 2010. "Adaptation to climate change in marine capture fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 606-615, May.
    3. Lauren A. Rogers & Robert Griffin & Talia Young & Emma Fuller & Kevin St. Martin & Malin L. Pinsky, 2019. "Shifting habitats expose fishing communities to risk under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 512-516, July.
    4. Sam Cunningham & Lori S. Bennear & Martin D. Smith, 2016. "Spillovers in Regional Fisheries Management: Do Catch Shares Cause Leakage?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(2), pages 344-362.
    5. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    6. Timothy J. Cline & Daniel E. Schindler & Ray Hilborn, 2017. "Fisheries portfolio diversification and turnover buffer Alaskan fishing communities from abrupt resource and market changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, April.
    7. Martin F. Quaas & Till Requate, 2013. "Sushi or Fish Fingers? Seafood Diversity, Collapsing Fish Stocks, and Multispecies Fishery Management," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 115(2), pages 381-422, April.
    8. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, September.
    9. Sethi, Suresh Andrew & Reimer, Matthew & Knapp, Gunnar, 2014. "Alaskan fishing community revenues and the stabilizing role of fishing portfolios," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 134-141.
    10. Colette Mortreux & Jon Barnett, 2017. "Adaptive capacity: exploring the research frontier," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), July.
    11. Michele L. Barnes & Peng Wang & Joshua E. Cinner & Nicholas A. J. Graham & Angela M. Guerrero & Lorien Jasny & Jacqueline Lau & Sarah R. Sutcliffe & Jessica Zamborain-Mason, 2020. "Social determinants of adaptive and transformative responses to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(9), pages 823-828, September.
    12. Martin D. Smith, 2002. "Two Econometric Approaches for Predicting the Spatial Behavior of Renewable Resource Harvesters," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(4), pages 522-538.
    13. Roy Endre Dahl & Atle Oglend, 2014. "Fish Price Volatility," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(4), pages 305-322.
    14. M. Barange & G. Merino & J. L. Blanchard & J. Scholtens & J. Harle & E. H. Allison & J. I. Allen & J. Holt & S. Jennings, 2014. "Impacts of climate change on marine ecosystem production in societies dependent on fisheries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 211-216, March.
    15. Smith, Martin D., 2005. "State dependence and heterogeneity in fishing location choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 319-340, September.
    16. Barbara Hutniczak, 2014. "Increasing Pressure on Unregulated Species Due to Changes in Individual Vessel Quotas: An Empirical Application to Trawler Fishing in the Baltic Sea," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(3), pages 201-217.
    17. Edwards, Steven F. & Link, Jason S. & Rountree, Barbara P., 2004. "Portfolio management of wild fish stocks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 317-329, July.
    18. El-Khatib, Rwan & Fogel, Kathy & Jandik, Tomas, 2015. "CEO network centrality and merger performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 349-382.
    19. Daniel S. Holland & Jon G. Sutinen, 2000. "Location Choice in New England Trawl Fisheries: Old Habits Die Hard," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(1), pages 133-149.
    20. Joshua K. Abbott & Alan C. Haynie & Matthew N. Reimer, 2015. "Hidden Flexibility: Institutions, Incentives, and the Margins of Selectivity in Fishing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(1), pages 169-195.
    21. Zhang, Junjie & Fleming, Jason & Goericke, Ralf, 2012. "Fishermen's perspectives on climate variability," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 466-472.
    22. Joshua S Stoll & Emma Fuller & Beatrice I Crona, 2017. "Uneven adaptive capacity among fishers in a sea of change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    23. Bockstael, Nancy E. & Opaluch, James J., 1983. "Discrete modelling of supply response under uncertainty: The case of the fishery," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 125-137, June.
    24. Stephen Kasperski, 2015. "Optimal Multi-species Harvesting in Ecologically and Economically Interdependent Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(4), pages 517-557, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hutniczak, Barbara & Münch, Angela, 2018. "Fishermen's location choice under spatio-temporal update of expectations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 124-136.
    2. Julio Peña Torres & Mabyr Valderrama, 2008. "Fishing Location decisions in the Chilean-Transzonal Jack Mackerel Fishery," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv217, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    3. Smith, Martin D. & Sanchirico, James N. & Wilen, James E., 2009. "The economics of spatial-dynamic processes: Applications to renewable resources," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 104-121, January.
    4. Haynie, Alan C. & Hicks, Robert L. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2009. "Common property, information, and cooperation: Commercial fishing in the Bering Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 406-413, December.
    5. Anna M. Birkenbach & Andreea L. Cojocaru & Frank Asche & Atle G. Guttormsen & Martin D. Smith, 2020. "Seasonal Harvest Patterns in Multispecies Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(3), pages 631-655, March.
    6. Hynes, Stephen & Gerritsen, Hans & Breen, Benjamin & Johnson, Mark, 2015. "Fishing site choice modelling using Vessel Monitoring System data," Working Papers 262592, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    7. Stafford, Tess M., 2018. "Accounting for outside options in discrete choice models: An application to commercial fishing effort," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 159-179.
    8. Abbott, Joshua K. & Wilen, James E., 2011. "Dissecting the tragedy: A spatial model of behavior in the commons," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 386-401.
    9. Sultan, Riad, 2020. "Fishing location choice and risk preferences among small fishers – Implications for fisheries management policies," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(2), June.
    10. Junjie Zhang & Martin Smith, 2011. "Heterogeneous Response to Marine Reserve Formation: A Sorting Model approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 311-325, July.
    11. Martin Smith & James Wilen, 2005. "Heterogeneous and Correlated Risk Preferences in Commercial Fishermen: The Perfect Storm Dilemma," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 53-71, July.
    12. Smith, Martin D., 2005. "State dependence and heterogeneity in fishing location choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 319-340, September.
    13. Martin D. Smith & Larry B. Crowder, 2011. "Valuing Ecosystem Services with Fishery Rents: A Lumped-Parameter Approach to Hypoxia in the Neuse River Estuary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-39, November.
    14. Reimer, Matthew N. & Abbott, Joshua K. & Haynie, Alan C., 2022. "Structural behavioral models for rights-based fisheries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. C. Haynie, Alan & F. Layton, David, 2010. "An expected profit model for monetizing fishing location choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 165-176, March.
    16. Thanassekos, Stéphane & Scheld, Andrew M., 2020. "Simulating the effects of environmental and market variability on fishing industry structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Hicks, Robert L. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2008. "Eco-labeling and dolphin avoidance: A dynamic model of tuna fishing in the Eastern Tropical Pacific," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 103-116, September.
    18. Keita Abe & Christopher M. Anderson & Matthew N. Reimer, 2022. "Catch More to Catch Less: Estimating Timing Choice as Dynamic Bycatch Avoidance Behavior," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 953-984, August.
    19. Hicks, Robert L. & Holland, Daniel S. & Kuriyama, Peter T. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2020. "Choice sets for spatial discrete choice models in data rich environments," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Hicks, Robert L. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2006. "A Spatial Model of Dolphin Avoidance in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21290, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:205:y:2023:i:c:s0921800922003871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.