IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v194y2022ics0921800922000209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Durability standards and clothing libraries for strengthening sustainable clothing markets

Author

Listed:
  • Multala, Brendan
  • Wagner, Jeffrey
  • Wang, Yiwei

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the sustainability properties of imposing a durability standard in clothing markets. In turn, our analysis provides economic theory support for clothing libraries as a form of collaborative consumption and as an incentive-compatible way for firms to comply with durability standards. Our insights to economic sustainability complement previous research that focuses upon strengthening environmental and social sustainability aspects of the textile market. We show that imposing a clothing durability standard in the textile industry, along with the credible threat that governments could instead impose Pigouvian taxes on clothing types, creates an incentive for clothing manufacturers to more strongly support clothing libraries. Manufacturer profit may fall less via clothing library participation than under the Pigouvian tax policy, and hence is relatively politically attractive to manufacturers. Environmental quality is lower under clothing libraries than under Pigouvian taxes; however, environmental quality is higher with clothing libraries than under ‘business as usual’ levels of market activity. Hence, we show that a durability standard may be considered a politically achievable improvement in overall (environmental, social and economic) sustainability and that such a standard is a compelling tool for promoting collaborative consumption via clothing libraries.

Suggested Citation

  • Multala, Brendan & Wagner, Jeffrey & Wang, Yiwei, 2022. "Durability standards and clothing libraries for strengthening sustainable clothing markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:194:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800922000209
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vita, Gibran & Lundström, Johan R. & Hertwich, Edgar G. & Quist, Jaco & Ivanova, Diana & Stadler, Konstantin & Wood, Richard, 2019. "The Environmental Impact of Green Consumption and Sufficiency Lifestyles Scenarios in Europe: Connecting Local Sustainability Visions to Global Consequences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Li, Shanshan & Kallas, Zein, 2021. "Meta-Analysis of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Food Products," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314970, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Stephen P. Holland & Jonathan E. Hughes & Christopher R. Knittel, 2009. "Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 106-146, February.
    4. Brouhle, Keith & Griffiths, Charles & Wolverton, Ann, 2009. "Evaluating the role of EPA policy levers: An examination of a voluntary program and regulatory threat in the metal-finishing industry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 166-181, March.
    5. Helen Arce Salazar & Leon Oerlemans, 2016. "Do We Follow the Leader or the Masses? Antecedents of the Willingness to Pay Extra for Eco-Products," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 286-314, July.
    6. Wesley Nimon & John Beghin, 1999. "Are Eco-Labels Valuable? Evidence From the Apparel Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 801-811.
    7. Kumar, Anil & Prakash, Gyan & Kumar, Gaurav, 2021. "Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Stephen P. Holland & Jonathan E. Hughes & Christopher R. Knittel, 2009. "Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 106-146, February.
    9. Fremstad, Anders & Underwood, Anthony & Zahran, Sammy, 2018. "The Environmental Impact of Sharing: Household and Urban Economies in CO2 Emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 137-147.
    10. Sanyal, Shamindra Nath & Mazumder, Rabin & Singh, Ramendra & Sharma, Yukti, 2021. "Uncertainty and affluent teenagers’ luxury buying-decision: The role of avoidance-related indecisiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Segerson, Kathleen & Wu, JunJie, 2006. "Nonpoint pollution control: Inducing first-best outcomes through the use of threats," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 165-184, March.
    12. Lambert, Louise & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Nyssens, Marthe & Severi, Elisabetta & Brolis, Olivier, 2019. "Unpacking the organisational diversity within the collaborative economy: The contribution of an analytical framework from social enterprise theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Palmer, Karen & Walls, Margaret, 1997. "Optimal policies for solid waste disposal Taxes, subsidies, and standards," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 193-205, August.
    14. Krystofik, Mark & Wagner, Jeffrey & Gaustad, Gabrielle, 2015. "Leveraging intellectual property rights to encourage green product design and remanufacturing for sustainable waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 44-54.
    15. Lawrence H. Goulder, 2020. "Timing Is Everything: How Economists Can Better Address the Urgency of Stronger Climate Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 143-156.
    16. Mrad, Mona & Majdalani, Joelle & Cui, Charles Chi & El Khansa, Zeinab, 2020. "Brand addiction in the contexts of luxury and fast-fashion brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hafeezullah Memon & Xiaoke Jin & Wei Tian & Chengyan Zhu, 2022. "Sustainable Textile Marketing—Editorial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-3, September.
    2. Bo Wu & Xiufen Xie & Weicheng Ke & Huiying Bao & Zhilan Duan & Zhenyu Jin & Xiaoqun Dai & Yan Hong, 2022. "Merchandising for Sustainable Fashion: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Zhujun Wang & Xuyuan Tao & Xianyi Zeng & Yingmei Xing & Zhenzhen Xu & Pascal Bruniaux, 2023. "A Machine Learning-Enhanced 3D Reverse Design Approach to Personalized Garments in Pursuit of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rhodes, Ekaterina & Scott, William A. & Jaccard, Mark, 2021. "Designing flexible regulations to mitigate climate change: A cross-country comparative policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Böhringer, Christoph & Garcia-Muros, Xaquin & Gonzalez-Eguino, Mikel & Rey, Luis, 2017. "US climate policy: A critical assessment of intensity standards," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S1), pages 125-135.
    3. Drabik, Dusan & de Gorter, Harry & Just, David R., 2010. "The Implications of Alternative Biofuel Policies on Carbon Leakage," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 102689, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Becker, Jonathon M., 2021. "General equilibrium impacts on the U.S. economy of a disruption to Chinese cobalt supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Christoph Böhringer & Carolyn Fischer & Nicholas Rivers, 2023. "Intensity-Based Rebating of Emission Pricing Revenues," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1059-1089.
    6. Noel, Michael D. & Roach, Travis, 2017. "Marginal reductions in vehicle emissions under a dual-blend ethanol mandate: Evidence from a natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 45-54.
    7. Stephen Bahadar & Muhammad Nadeem & Rashid Zaman, 2023. "Toxic chemical releases and idiosyncratic return volatility: A prospect theory perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2109-2143, June.
    8. Jean-Pierre Amigues & Ujjayant Chakravorty & Gilles Lafforgue & Michel Moreaux, 2022. "Comparing Volume and Blend Renewable Energy Mandates under a Carbon Budget," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 147, pages 51-78.
    9. Christopher Sprague & Jeffrey Wagner, 2018. "Economic Motivations for Software Bug Bounties," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 550-557.
    10. Lu, Yunguo & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "National mitigation policy and the competitiveness of Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Mathias Reynaert, 2021. "Abatement Strategies and the Cost of Environmental Regulation: Emission Standards on the European Car Market," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(1), pages 454-488.
    12. Qiu, Cheng & Colson, Gregory & Wetzstein, Michael, 2014. "An ethanol blend wall shift is prone to increase petroleum gasoline demand," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 160-165.
    13. Antonio M. Bento & Mark R. Jacobsen & Christopher R. Knittel & Arthur A. van Benthem, 2020. "Estimating the Costs and Benefits of Fuel-Economy Standards," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 129-157.
    14. Benjamin Dachis, 2009. "Low-Carbon Fuel Standards: Driving in the Wrong Direction," e-briefs 80, C.D. Howe Institute.
    15. Don Fullerton & Chi L. Ta, 2022. "What Determines Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Standards? General Equilibrium Analytical Model and Empirical Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9565, CESifo.
    16. Barla, Philippe & Proost, Stef, 2012. "Energy efficiency policy in a non-cooperative world," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2209-2215.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/53r60a8s3kup1vc9je5h30d2n is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Landis, Florian & Rausch, Sebastian, 2019. "Policy Instrument Choice with Co-Benefits: The Case of Decarbonizing Transport," Conference papers 333103, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Bell, Kendon & Zilberman, David, 2016. "The potential for renewable fuels under greenhouse gas pricing: The case of sugarcane in Brazil," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt03h2850w, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    20. Böhringer, Christoph & Garcia-Muros, Xaquin & Cazcarro, Ignacio & Arto, Iñaki, 2017. "The efficiency cost of protective measures in climate policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 446-454.
    21. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2019. "Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 594-612.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:194:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.