IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v147y2018icp298-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrative Methodological Framework for Setting Environmental Criteria: Evaluation of Public Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Ramin, Maryam
  • Cheng, Vincent Y.S.
  • Kim, Dong-Kyun
  • Ni, Felicity J.
  • Javed, Aisha
  • Kelly, Noreen E.
  • Yang, Cindy
  • Midlane-Jones, Sarah
  • Mugalingam, Shan
  • Arhonditsis, George B.

Abstract

The main objective of the present study is to introduce public preferences into the development of water-quality criteria that effectively balance environmental concerns and socioeconomic values. A novel feature of our research is the analysis of subjective public judgments with Bayesian inference techniques, which are ultimately connected with environmental conditions through mathematical modeling. Our case study is the Bay of Quinte, Ontario, Canada; an embayment at the northeastern end of Lake Ontario with a long history of eutrophication, characterized by frequent and spatially extensive algal blooms and predominance of toxic cyanobacteria. In this study, we present a major survey to determine public opinions on water quality in the area. Our survey was conducted among a random sample of 1527 local residents and tourists during the summers of 2013 and 2014. The key findings of the survey were: (i) fishing (29%) and beauty of the area (20%) were the main reasons for public use of the Bay of Quinte; (ii) among different water-quality problems, the public chose the algal scums (26%) and the integrity of fish populations (22%) as the main issues; (iii) only 30% of the returning visitors noticed that the clarity of water is better now relative to the prevailing conditions five years ago; (iv) there is a dramatic change in public sentiment between the beginning and end of the summer season; and (v) a substantial portion of local residents were willing to contribute financially towards the restoration of the bay. Our modeling analysis suggests that the likelihood of public satisfaction increases significantly when the total phosphorus concentrations fall below the critical levels of 20–25 μg L−1, which however is a difficult target to achieve even under significantly reduced nutrient-loading conditions. Other biological variables such as chlorophyll a concentrations, harmful algal blooms, and toxin levels in locations frequently used by the public appear to more closely influence their satisfaction level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramin, Maryam & Cheng, Vincent Y.S. & Kim, Dong-Kyun & Ni, Felicity J. & Javed, Aisha & Kelly, Noreen E. & Yang, Cindy & Midlane-Jones, Sarah & Mugalingam, Shan & Arhonditsis, George B., 2018. "An Integrative Methodological Framework for Setting Environmental Criteria: Evaluation of Public Preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 298-311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:298-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917307255
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Dong-Kyun & Zhang, Weitao & Rao, Yerubandi R. & Watson, Sue & Mugalingam, Shan & Labencki, Tanya & Dittrich, Maria & Morley, Andrew & Arhonditsis, George B., 2013. "Improving the representation of internal nutrient recycling with phosphorus mass balance models: A case study in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 53-68.
    2. Zhang, Weitao & Kim, Dong-Kyun & Rao, Yerubandi R. & Watson, Sue & Mugalingam, Shan & Labencki, Tanya & Dittrich, Maria & Morley, Andrew & Arhonditsis, George B., 2013. "Can simple phosphorus mass balance models guide management decisions? A case study in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 66-79.
    3. Zhang, Wendong & Wilson, Robyn S. & Burnett, Elizabeth & Irwin, Elena G. & Martin, Jay F., 2016. "What motivates farmers to apply phosphorus at the “right” time? Survey evidence from the Western Lake Erie Basin," ISU General Staff Papers 201608040700001588, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Gail Krantzberg, 2012. "Renegotiation of the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Confusion to Promise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Boennec, Rémy & Nicolaï, Isabelle & Da Costa, Pascal, 2019. "Assessing 50 innovative mobility offers in low-density areas: A French application using a two-step decision-aid method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Weitao & Watson, Sue B. & Rao, Yerubandi R. & Kling, Hedy J., 2013. "A linked hydrodynamic, water quality and algal biomass model for a large, multi-basin lake: A working management tool," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 37-50.
    2. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    3. Huang, Jiacong & Chen, Qiuwen & Peng, Jian & Gao, Junfeng, 2020. "Quantifying the cost-effectiveness of nutrient-removal strategies for a lowland rural watershed: Insights from process-based modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    4. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Lijing Gao & J. Arbuckle, 2022. "Examining farmers’ adoption of nutrient management best management practices: a social cognitive framework," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 535-553, June.
    6. Scriven, Danielle R. & DiBacco, Claudio & Locke, Andrea & Therriault, Thomas W., 2015. "Ballast water management in Canada: A historical perspective and implications for the future," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 121-133.
    7. Beetstra, Margaret A. & Wilson, Robyn S. & Doidge, Mary, 2022. "Conservation behavior over time: Examining a Midwestern farmer sample," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Gao, Li & Zhang, Wendong & Mei, Yingdan & Sam, Abdoul G. & Song, Yu & Jin, Shuqin, 2018. "Do farmers adopt fewer conservation practices on rented land? Evidence from straw retention in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 609-621.
    9. Wang, Yanping & Peng, Zhaoliang & Liu, Gang & Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Xiangqian & Hu, Weiping, 2023. "A mathematical model for phosphorus interactions and transport at the sediment-water interface in a large shallow lake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    10. Xu, Zhihao & Yin, Xinan & Yang, Zhifeng & Cai, Yanpeng & Sun, Tao, 2016. "New model to assessing nutrient assimilative capacity in plant-dominated lakes: Considering ecological effects of hydrological changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 94-102.
    11. Kim, Dong-Kyun & Zhang, Weitao & Rao, Yerubandi R. & Watson, Sue & Mugalingam, Shan & Labencki, Tanya & Dittrich, Maria & Morley, Andrew & Arhonditsis, George B., 2013. "Improving the representation of internal nutrient recycling with phosphorus mass balance models: A case study in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 53-68.
    12. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    13. Sawadgo, Wendiam & Zhang, Wendong & Plastina, Alejandro, 2019. "What drives landowners’ conservation decisions? Evidence from Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 201905230700001082, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Zhang, Weitao & Kim, Dong-Kyun & Rao, Yerubandi R. & Watson, Sue & Mugalingam, Shan & Labencki, Tanya & Dittrich, Maria & Morley, Andrew & Arhonditsis, George B., 2013. "Can simple phosphorus mass balance models guide management decisions? A case study in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario, Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 66-79.
    15. Bagheri, Asghar & Teymouri, Ali, 2022. "Farmers’ intended and actual adoption of soil and water conservation practices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Li, Yuzhao & Liu, Yong & Zhao, Lei & Hastings, Alan & Guo, Huaicheng, 2015. "Exploring change of internal nutrients cycling in a shallow lake: A dynamic nutrient driven phytoplankton model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 137-148.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:298-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.