IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v96y2019icp308-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of parenting stress on social interactive parenting with a focus on Korean employed mothers' parenting support from ecological contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Yea-Ji
  • Lee, Kangyi

Abstract

This study examined the mediating effects of working mothers' perceived parenting support from multilayered ecological contexts between parenting stress and social interactive parenting in Korea. As the employment rate of Korean mothers has increased over time, there is a growing concern for identifying available and affordable parenting support to allow mothers the opportunity to balance both work and family. This article reviewed the essential supportive factors that working mothers in Korea need to raise an infant within a comprehensive framework. Participants in this study included employed mothers from 445 families who had at least one infant and who were identified from the nationwide Panel Study of Korean children (PSKC). Families were chosen from dual-working families so that both mothers and fathers could be included, as they clearly expressed their current employment status as full-time workers. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the relations among variables. The results verified that parenting stress was negatively associated with perceived family functioning, social support and community support of mothers, and the association between parenting stress and the social interactive parenting of mothers was mediated only by social support. Moreover, the indirect effect of parenting stress on social interactive parenting through social support was significant. These findings suggest the importance of supportive factors in helping mothers balance both work and family after childbirth while also considering the perceived parenting support of working mothers in a scope of multidimensional ecological contexts. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Yea-Ji & Lee, Kangyi, 2019. "The effect of parenting stress on social interactive parenting with a focus on Korean employed mothers' parenting support from ecological contexts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 308-315.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:96:y:2019:i:c:p:308-315
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740918304766
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolfo Bulatao, 1981. "Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(1), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyun-jung Ju & Seung-ha Lee, 2019. "Mothers’ Perceptions of the Phenomenon of Bullying among Young Children in South Korea," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Sun-Young Ji & Hye-Sun Jung, 2021. "Work–Family Balance among Dual-Earner Couples in South Korea: A Latent Profile Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Kaka Shim & Hyunsook Shin, 2022. "Describing the Ecology of Parenting Based on Preschool Mothers’ Social Relationships in Korea: An Ecological Theory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Seung-ha Lee & Hyun-jung Ju, 2019. "Mothers’ Difficulties and Expectations for Intervention of Bullying among Young Children in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Eun Jung Kim & Min Jung Cho & Mi Jeong Kim, 2021. "Mothers’ Parenting Stress and Neighborhood Characteristics in Early Childhood (Ages 0–4)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Rosina & Laura Cavalli & Maria Rita Testa, 2011. "Couples’ childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 157-178.
    2. Natalie Nitsche & Anna Matysiak & Jan Bavel & Daniele Vignoli, 2018. "Partners’ Educational Pairings and Fertility Across Europe," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(4), pages 1195-1232, August.
    3. Karsten Hank & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2002. "Gender preferences for children revisited: new evidence from Germany," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-017, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    4. Zuzanna Brzozowska & Eva Beaujouan & Kryštof Zeman, 2022. "Is Two Still Best? Change in Parity-Specific Fertility Across Education in Low-Fertility Countries," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(5), pages 2085-2114, October.
    5. Jolene Tan, 2023. "Perceptions towards pronatalist policies in Singapore," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Monika Mynarska & Zuzanna Brzozowska, 2022. "Things to Gain, Things to Lose: Perceived Costs and Benefits of Children and Intention to Remain Childless in Poland," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 160-171.
    7. Richard Williams & Elizabeth Thomson, 1985. "Can spouses be trusted? A look at husband/wife proxy reports," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(1), pages 115-123, February.
    8. Hirvonen, Lalaina, 2009. "The Effect of Children on Earnings Using Exogenous Variation in Family Size: Swedish Evidence," Working Paper Series 2/2009, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
    9. Sági, Judit & Lentner, Csaba, 2020. "A magyar népességpolitikai intézkedések tényezői és várható hatásai [Factors and expected outcomes of pro-birth policy interventions]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 289-308.
    10. Pierluigi Conzo & Giulia Fuochi & Letizia Mencarini, 2017. "Fertility and Life Satisfaction in Rural Ethiopia," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(4), pages 1331-1351, August.
    11. Heather M. Rackin & Christina M. Gibson‐Davis, 2022. "Familial Deaths and First Birth," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 1027-1059, December.
    12. Rachel Margolis & Mikko Myrskyla, 2016. "Children’s Sex and the Happiness of Parents," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(3), pages 403-420, August.
    13. Giammarco Alderotti & Daniele Vignoli & Michela Baccini & Anna Matysiak, 2019. "Employment Uncertainty and Fertility: A Network Meta-Analysis of European Research Findings," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2019_06, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    14. Isabella Buber-Ennser & Alexia Prskawetz, 2000. "Fertility in second unions in Austria," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 3(2).
    15. Kristen Harknett & Francesco Billari & Carla Medalia, 2014. "Do Family Support Environments Influence Fertility? Evidence from 20 European Countries," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 1-33, February.
    16. Karsten Hank & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2000. "Gender Preferences for Children in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 2(1).
    17. Sara Yeatman & Christie Sennott & Steven Culpepper, 2013. "Young Women’s Dynamic Family Size Preferences in the Context of Transitioning Fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(5), pages 1715-1737, October.
    18. Tomáš Sobotka & Éva Beaujouan, 2014. "Two Is Best? The Persistence of a Two-Child Family Ideal in Europe," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 391-419, September.
    19. Maryam Moeeni & Arash Rashidian & Akbar Aghajanian, 2018. "Women’s relative status and childbearing intentions: Empirical evidence from Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    20. Christoph Bühler & Dimiter Philipov, 2005. "Social Capital Related to Fertility: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 3(1), pages 53-81.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:96:y:2019:i:c:p:308-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.