IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v61y2016icp230-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for discontinued service among Guardians ad Litem

Author

Listed:
  • Bright, Melissa A.
  • Shovali, Tamar E.
  • Cooper, Alysha

Abstract

High attrition among Guardians ad Litem can compromise the quality of care for youth in the dependency system. In order to improve the retention of Guardians ad Litem and the quality of work completed, the characteristics of volunteers who have discontinued service as well as the reasons these volunteers provide for discontinuing service were examined. These analyses were conducted using a Grounded Theory approach as well as descriptive and bivariate statistics. The most frequently reported reason for discontinued service was the volunteers' inactivity for six months or longer. In addition, younger volunteers aiming to gain experience in the field had the shortest length of service, while older volunteers and volunteers who no longer wished to continue had the longest length of service. Our recommendations include 1) standardized and consistent tracking systems of volunteers, 2) create a track for student volunteers who cannot commit to the preferred length of service, 3) recruit older adults who may have more time and life experience to commit to the program, and 4) enhance volunteer commitment by increasing socialization, celebrating accomplishments, and cultivating volunteers' work expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bright, Melissa A. & Shovali, Tamar E. & Cooper, Alysha, 2016. "Reasons for discontinued service among Guardians ad Litem," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 230-236.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:61:y:2016:i:c:p:230-236
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740915301407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily A. Greenfield & Nadine F. Marks, 2004. "Formal Volunteering as a Protective Factor for Older Adults' Psychological Well-Being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(5), pages 258-264.
    2. Barbara A. Butrica & Richard W. Johnson & Sheila R. Zedlewski, 2009. "Volunteer Dynamics of Older Americans," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(5), pages 644-655.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cooley, Morgan E. & Thompson, Heather M. & Colvin, Marianna L., 2019. "A qualitative examination of recruitment and motivation to become a Guardian ad Litem in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-124.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lamar Pierce & Jason Snyder, 2015. "Unethical Demand and Employee Turnover," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 853-869, November.
    2. Trine Filges & Anu Siren & Torben Fridberg & Bjørn C. V. Nielsen, 2020. "Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    3. Liu, Yiwei & Duan, Yanan & Xu, Ling, 2020. "Volunteer service and positive attitudes toward aging among Chinese older adults: The mediating role of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Anna Amilon & Malene Rode Larsen, 2021. "Volunteer work among older adults in Denmark, 1997–2017: What can explain the continuous upward trend?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 17-28, March.
    5. Holger Lengfeld & Jessica Ordemann, 2016. "The long shadow of occupation: Volunteering in retirement," Rationality and Society, , vol. 28(1), pages 3-23, February.
    6. Jun Nakahara, 2013. "Effects of Social Activities outside the Home on Life Satisfaction among Elderly People Living Alone," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 112-112, March.
    7. Heng Qu, 2022. "Differential Associations Between Volunteering and Subjective Well-Being by Labor Force Status: An Investigation of Experiential and Evaluative Well-Being Using Time Use Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1737-1770, April.
    8. Liu Lili & Cui Yingjin, 2020. "An Empirical Investigation of Chinese College Students in Volunteer Teaching Activities: Dilemmas, Challenges, and Solutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    9. Andrés Salas-Vallina, 2020. "Towards a Sustainable Leader-Follower Relationship: Constructive Dissensus, Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness at Work (HAW)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Carol Ryff & Burton Singer, 2008. "Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 13-39, January.
    11. Michelle I. Jongenelis & Liyuwork Mitiku Dana & Jeni Warburton & Ben Jackson & Robert U. Newton & Zenobia Talati & Simone Pettigrew, 2020. "Factors associated with formal volunteering among retirees," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 229-239, June.
    12. Wang, Wei-Pang & Wu, Li-Hsueh & Zhang, Wei & Tsay, Ruey-Ming, 2019. "Culturally-specific productive engagement and self-rated health among Taiwanese older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 79-86.
    13. Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2015. "Voluntary Activities and Daily Happiness in the US," IZA Discussion Papers 8764, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Andrea Principi & Henrike Galenkamp & Roberta Papa & Marco Socci & Bianca Suanet & Andrea Schmidt & Katharine Schulmann & Stella Golinowska & Agnieszka Sowa & Amilcar Moreira & Dorly J. H. Deeg, 2016. "Do predictors of volunteering in older age differ by health status?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 91-102, June.
    15. Dolan, Paul & Peasgood, Tessa & White, Mathew, 2008. "Do we really know what makes us happy A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 94-122, February.
    16. John Rodwell & Dianne Johnson & Lara Thynne, 2024. "Discretion and Obligation Across Volunteering and Caring: Shining Light on Non-Voluntary Carers in the Retiring Encore Segment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 589-610, September.
    17. Grant, Adam M. & Sonnentag, Sabine, 2010. "Doing good buffers against feeling bad: Prosocial impact compensates for negative task and self-evaluations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 13-22, January.
    18. Kim, Eric S. & Konrath, Sara H., 2016. "Volunteering is prospectively associated with health care use among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 122-129.
    19. Miha Dominko & Miroslav Verbič, 2019. "Subjective well-being among the elderly: A bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1187-1207, May.
    20. David Quintana & Alejandro Cervantes & Yago Sáez & Pedro Isasi, 2018. "Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being at Advanced Age: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:61:y:2016:i:c:p:230-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.