IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v158y2024ics0190740924000525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling alternative schools: A systematic review of cognitive and social-emotional development in different educational approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Guerrero, Silvia
  • Valenciano-Valcárcel, Javier
  • Rodríguez, Alicia

Abstract

Alternative schools such as Montessori, Reggio Emilia or Waldorf emerged on the educational scene over a century ago but have proliferated internationally in the last 15–20 years. In addition to being considered as educational alternatives to conventional approaches, these schools are often associated with enhanced benefits in cognitive, social, emotional, and personal development of attending children. This assumption stems from the fact that these approaches are aligned with the basic principles of child development, especially because in these schools, daily practices are organized according to children's developmental strengths and considering individual learning rhythms. However, empirical research on this assumption is scarce and little is known about the type of schools studied and the aspects of development analyzed. Thus, this systematic review aims to address two objectives: to identify which types of alternative schools have captured the interest of researchers and to explore the most studied areas of cognitive and socioemotional development during childhood, along with the main findings. The review includes studies conducted in the last decade that compare the effects of attending alternative schools versus conventional preschools, elementary schools, or high schools. Twenty-four articles were included, most of them focused on Montessori and, to a lesser extent, Waldorf schools. Other types of alternative schools (democratic, Freinet) had limited representation. Executive function, creativity and academic achievement have received more attention in research compared to well-being, social competence, or independence. Overall, the results show a better performance in children from alternative schools or no differences with their counterparts in conventional schools. However, this study provides a critical perspective on these findings, highlighting limitations that should be considered when interpreting them and guiding future research endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • Guerrero, Silvia & Valenciano-Valcárcel, Javier & Rodríguez, Alicia, 2024. "Unveiling alternative schools: A systematic review of cognitive and social-emotional development in different educational approaches," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924000525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924000525
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruijs, Nienke, 2017. "The effects of Montessori education: Evidence from admission lotteries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 19-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justus J. Randolph & Anaya Bryson & Lakshmi Menon & David K. Henderson & Austin Kureethara Manuel & Stephen Michaels & debra leigh walls rosenstein & Warren McPherson & Rebecca O'Grady & Angeline S. L, 2023. "Montessori education's impact on academic and nonacademic outcomes: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924000525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.