IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v157y2024ics0190740923005728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child protection proceedings for infants: Analysis of court files to identify court outcomes and requirements for families in child protection safety plans

Author

Listed:
  • O'Donnell, M.
  • Burrow, S.
  • Grose, M.
  • Usher, R.
  • Marriott, R.
  • Taplin, S.

Abstract

Given the increasing involvement of families in child protection processes pre-birth and during infancy, it is imperative that we have greater evidence of child protection processes during this period. A court file review was used to determine the characteristics and issues for families who are going through care proceedings for their infants, the outcomes of court proceedings and the safety plans required for families. Of the 39 court files analysed 36 % of the families were reported to child protection prenatally and 64 % were reported postnatally. One in five infants were removed into care directly from the maternity ward with the average age of removal being 4.9 months. The main child protection concerns related to domestic violence (51 %), drug and alcohol use (49 %) and mental health issues (41 %). The majority of these cases resulted in final orders with a large proportion having until 18 protection orders (41 %), and 23 % having orders revoked or withdrawn allowing the infant to be reunified to the family. The complexity of issues of the cases in these care proceedings highlights the need for greater sophistication in strategies to support these families who cross multiple service systems to enable reunification of families and prevention of removals.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Donnell, M. & Burrow, S. & Grose, M. & Usher, R. & Marriott, R. & Taplin, S., 2024. "Child protection proceedings for infants: Analysis of court files to identify court outcomes and requirements for families in child protection safety plans," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:157:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005728
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005728
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eden S. H. Yu & Kenneth S. Chan, 2019. "Evaluation of the trade policy review for Hong Kong China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(12), pages 3478-3487, December.
    2. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2020. "Major Improvements to Gross National Product," Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Analysis, November.
    3. Hutsuliak H.D. & Hutsuliak Yu.H., 2019. "Principles Of Evaluation Of Ecological Situations," Balanced Nature Using, Institute of agroecology and environmental management, vol. 8(2), pages 73-81, May.
    4. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2020. "The Evolution of U.S. National Income Accounting," Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Analysis, September.
    5. Feifei Sun & Dong Sheng & Miaomiao Ma & Ling Liu, 2019. "Evaluation on Implementation of Water Law in China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2599-2613, May.
    6. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2020. "The Development of Gross National Product," Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Analysis, October.
    7. Carolina A Munoz & Angus J D Campbell & Paul H Hemsworth & Rebecca E Doyle, 2019. "Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keeley, Jessica & Mancini, Vincent O. & Castell, Emily & Breen, Lauren J., 2023. "Factors influencing public perceptions of child neglect: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Davidson, Angus Alexander & Young, Michael Denis & Leake, John Espie & O’Connor, Patrick, 2022. "Aid and forgetting the enemy: A systematic review of the unintended consequences of international development in fragile and conflict-affected situations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. K Hervé Dakpo & Laure Latruffe & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux, 2024. "Measuring productivity when technology is heterogeneous using a latent class stochastic frontier model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2175-2205, November.
    4. Cherrier, Hélène & Türe, Meltem, 2022. "Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1207-1217.
    5. Huan Liu & Guangyuan Niu & Qingxiang Zhang & Yuxi Yang & Hong Yao, 2022. "Town-Level Aquatic Environmental Sensitivity Assessment Based on an Improved Ecological Footprint Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 763-777, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:157:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.