IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bnu/journl/v8y2019i2p73-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principles Of Evaluation Of Ecological Situations

Author

Listed:
  • Hutsuliak H.D.
  • Hutsuliak Yu.H.

    (Transcarpathian State Agricultural Research Station of the Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region)

Abstract

determined, which, in turn, requires a deep study of the environmental features of the environment, complex and interrelated phenomena that occur in the biosphere under the influence of human economic activity, various socio-political, socio-economic, industrial and demographic processes. The principles that need to be guided when performing specific tasks of a spatial analysis of environmental situations and their assessment are justified: the principle of the dependence of the formation and development of environmental situations on natural and socio-economic factors; the principle of compliance (mismatch) of the anthropogenic load of the sustainability potential and the natural resource potential of the landscape; the principle of environmental significance of natural and socio-economic factors; priority principle; the principle of duration, discontinuity in the development of environmental situations; the principle of danger and risk of an environmental situation; modular principle; combination principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Hutsuliak H.D. & Hutsuliak Yu.H., 2019. "Principles Of Evaluation Of Ecological Situations," Balanced Nature Using, Institute of agroecology and environmental management, vol. 8(2), pages 73-81, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:73-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://natureus.org.ua/repec/archive/2_2019/9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cherrier, Hélène & Türe, Meltem, 2022. "Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1207-1217.
    2. O'Donnell, M. & Burrow, S. & Grose, M. & Usher, R. & Marriott, R. & Taplin, S., 2024. "Child protection proceedings for infants: Analysis of court files to identify court outcomes and requirements for families in child protection safety plans," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:73-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olexii Shkuratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaeemua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.