IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v156y2024ics0190740923005261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing the likelihood of kinship Placements: Testing the effectiveness of an intensive family search and engagement intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Goering, Emily Smith
  • Kaye, Sarah
  • Reyes, Lucia
  • Beleal, Stephanie
  • Almadani, Alyse
  • Proctor-Frazier, Caitlin
  • Rosman, Elisa

Abstract

Kinship care, both formal and informal, is a practice that has received more attention in the past two decades due to the benefits found for children paced with kin, rather than in foster care with strangers. Placements with kin are often facilitated by utilizing intensive family search and engagement programs to identify and engage relatives. Methods:Using a retrospective longitudinal quasi-experimental design the present study evaluates the effectiveness of BLINDED intervention, an intervention that utilizes family search and engagement practices to place children who enter foster care in kinship placements as quickly as possible. A matched comparison group was constructed using Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to assess differences between the intervention and comparison groups onplacement with kin, proportion of time spent with kin, exit from care type, placement stability, placement in restrictive setting, time to case exit, and reentry. Findings: Multivariate models accounting for child and case characteristics and nesting within counties found differences between the intervention and comparison group on placement with kin, proportion of time with kin and exit from care type. Specifically,children served by BLINDED have 2.4 times greater odds of being placed with kin (OR 2.42,p <.001),9 % increase in time spent with kin (p <.001),an increased likelihood of custody/guardianship (RRR 1.67, p <.01), and decreased likelihood of adoption (RRR 0.52, p <.001).Results confirm prior findings of BLINDEDs’ effectiveness at improving kinship related outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Goering, Emily Smith & Kaye, Sarah & Reyes, Lucia & Beleal, Stephanie & Almadani, Alyse & Proctor-Frazier, Caitlin & Rosman, Elisa, 2024. "Increasing the likelihood of kinship Placements: Testing the effectiveness of an intensive family search and engagement intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Landsman, Miriam J. & Boel-Studt, Shamra & Malone, Kelli, 2014. "Results from a family finding experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-69.
    2. Lin, Ching-Hsuan, 2014. "Evaluating Services for Kinship Care Families: A Systematic Review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 32-41.
    3. Needell, Barbara & Brookhart, M. Alan & Lee, Seon, 2003. "Black children and foster care placement in California," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5-6), pages 393-408.
    4. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2018. "Children's mental health and its predictors in kinship and non-kinship foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 243-262.
    5. Osborne, Jennifer & Hindt, Lauren A. & Lutz, Nathan & Hodgkinson, Nicole & Leon, Scott C., 2021. "Placement stability among children in kinship and non-kinship foster placements across multiple placements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Koh, Eun & Testa, Mark F., 2011. "Children discharged from kin and non-kin foster homes: Do the risks of foster care re-entry differ?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1497-1505, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn & Ahn, Haksoon & Huang, Hui & Shaw, Terry, 2020. "A new kinship typology and factors associated with receiving financial assistance in kinship care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Rabassa, Judit & Fuentes-Peláez, Nuria, 2023. "Effectiveness of group intervention in improving kinship care families’ outcomes: A systematic review of group interventions aimed at kinship caregivers and youth in kinship care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Tilbury, Clare & Thoburn, June, 2009. "Using racial disproportionality and disparity indicators to measure child welfare outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1101-1106, October.
    4. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2018. "Children's mental health and its predictors in kinship and non-kinship foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 243-262.
    5. Cénat, Jude Mary & McIntee, Sara-Emilie & Mukunzi, Joana N. & Noorishad, Pari-Gole, 2021. "Overrepresentation of Black children in the child welfare system: A systematic review to understand and better act," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Marshall, Jane Marie & Haight, Wendy L., 2014. "Understanding racial disproportionality affecting African American Youth who cross over from the child welfare to the juvenile justice system: Communication, power, race and social class," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 82-90.
    7. Semanchin Jones, Annette & Kim, JaeRan & Hill, Katharine & Diebold, Josal, 2018. "Voluntary placements in child welfare: A comparative analysis of state statutes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 387-394.
    8. Koh, Eun & Daughtery, Laura & Ware, Allysa, 2022. "Informal kinship caregivers’ parenting experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:114-128 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wulczyn, Fred, 2020. "Race/ethnicity and running away from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Schoemaker, Nikita K. & Juffer, Femmie & Rippe, Ralph C.A. & Vermeer, Harriet J. & Stoltenborgh, Marije & Jagersma, Gabrine J. & Maras, Athanasios & Alink, Lenneke R.A., 2020. "Positive parenting in foster care: Testing the effectiveness of a video-feedback intervention program on foster parents’ behavior and attitudes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Victor, Bryan G. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Moore, Andrew & Mowbray, Orion & Evangelist, Michael & Perron, Brian E., 2016. "Foster home licensing and risk of reentry to out-of-home care following family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 112-119.
    13. Ryan, Joseph P. & Herz, Denise & Hernandez, Pedro M. & Marshall, Jane Marie, 2007. "Maltreatment and delinquency: Investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice processing," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1035-1050, August.
    14. Mersky, Joshua P. & Janczewski, Colleen, 2013. "Adult well-being of foster care alumni: Comparisons to other child welfare recipients and a non-child welfare sample in a high-risk, urban setting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 367-376.
    15. Rolock, Nancy & White, Kevin & Blakey, Joan M. & Ocasio, Kerrie & Korsch-Williams, Amy & Flanigan, Chelsea & Bai, Rong & Faulkner, Monica & Marra, Laura & Fong, Rowena, 2023. "Living apart after adoption or guardianship: Perspectives of adoptive parents and guardians," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Esposito, Tonino & Chabot, Martin & Rothwell, David W. & Trocmé, Nico & Delaye, Ashleigh, 2017. "Out-of-home placement and regional variations in poverty and health and social services spending: A multilevel analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 34-43.
    17. Carter, Vernon B., 2009. "Prediction of placement into out-of-home care for American Indian/Alaskan Natives compared to non-Indians," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 840-846, August.
    18. Lery, Bridgette & Shaw, Terry V. & Magruder, Joseph, 2005. "Using administrative child welfare data to identify sibling groups," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 783-791, July.
    19. Marsh, Christine A. & Browne, Jenny & Taylor, Jan & Davis, Deborah, 2017. "Characteristics and outcomes of newborns entered who entered into care (EIC) within 7days of birth in NSW, Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 261-267.
    20. Hoffmeister, Michael, 2024. "Inequitable access to relative caregiving: Implications of foster care regulations in Finland, New Zealand, and the United States," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    21. Gable, Sara & Holliday, Amelia & Zars, Jonathon & Simelus, Sonita & Nickell, Angela & Anderson, Bradd, 2024. "Intergenerational conflict, contact with biological parents, and child functioning in kinship caregiver families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.