IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v129y2021ics0190740921002498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening decisions for non-abuse concerns reported to child protection agencies- a structural equation model for referral content and decision outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Vis, Svein Arild
  • Lauritzen, Camilla
  • Fluke, John

Abstract

Child protection referrals that contain information about incidents of physical child abuse, sexual abuse, and domestic violence have a high chance of being screened in for investigation. The aim of the current study is to investigate which case factors that affect the decision to screen-in cases with other types of concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Vis, Svein Arild & Lauritzen, Camilla & Fluke, John, 2021. "Screening decisions for non-abuse concerns reported to child protection agencies- a structural equation model for referral content and decision outcome," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:129:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921002498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740921002498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Staer, Trine & Bjørknes, Ragnhild, 2015. "Ethnic disproportionality in the child welfare system: A Norwegian national cohort study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 26-32.
    2. Williams, Gabriela & Tonmyr, Lil & Jack, Susan M. & Fallon, Barbara & MacMillan, Harriet L., 2011. "Determinants of maltreatment substantiation in a sample of infants involved with the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1345-1353, August.
    3. Wells, Susan J. & Fluke, John D. & Brown, C. Hendricks, 1995. "The decision to investigate: Child protection practice in 12 local agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 523-546.
    4. Stoddart, J.K. & Fallon, B. & Trocmé, N. & Fluke, J., 2018. "Substantiated Child Maltreatment: Which factors do workers focus on when making this critical decision?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robichaud, Marie-Joëlle & Pullen Sansfaçon, Annie & Poirier, Marie-Andrée, 2020. "Decision making at substantiation in cases involving racialized families: Child protection workers’ perceptions of influential factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Maria Manuela Calheiros & Sandra Ornelas & Eunice Magalhães & Margarida Vaz Garrido, 2022. "Profiles of Young Children Involved with Child Protection Services in Portugal," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 933-958, June.
    3. McLaughlin, Michael & Jonson-Reid, Melissa, 2017. "The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 407-412.
    4. Giovannoni, Jeanne & Meezan, William, 1995. "Rethinking supply and demand in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 465-470.
    5. Geoff Debelle & Nikolaos Efstathiou & Rafiyah Khan & Annette Williamson & Manjit Summan & Julie Taylor, 2022. "The Typology and Topography of Child Abuse and Neglect: The Experience of a Tertiary Children’s Centre," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Smith, Carrie & Fluke, John D. & Fallon, Barbara & Mishna, Faye & Decker Pierce, Barbara, 2017. "Role specialization and service integration in child welfare: Does organizational structure influence the decision to refer to supportive services?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 139-148.
    7. Fylkesnes, Marte Knag & Taylor, Julie & Iversen, Anette Christine, 2018. "Precarious participation: Exploring ethnic minority youth's narratives about out-of-home placement in Norway," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 341-347.
    8. Jent, Jason F. & Eaton, Cyd K. & Knickerbocker, Lauren & Lambert, Walter F. & Merrick, Melissa T. & Dandes, Susan K., 2011. "Multidisciplinary child protection decision making about physical abuse: Determining substantiation thresholds and biases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1673-1682, September.
    9. Allan, Heather & Harlaar, Nicole & Hollinshead, Dana & Drury, Ida & Merkel-Holguin, Lisa, 2017. "The impact of worker and agency characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 229-237.
    10. Simmel, Cassandra & Shpiegel, Svetlana, 2013. "Describing the context and nature of emotional maltreatment reports in children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 626-633.
    11. Wolock, Isabel & Sherman, Patricia & Feldman, Leonard H. & Metzger, Barbara, 2001. "Child abuse and neglect referral patterns: A longitudinal study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 21-47, January.
    12. Fluke, John D. & Corwin, Tyler W. & Hollinshead, Dana M. & Maher, Erin J., 2016. "Family preservation or child safety? Associations between child welfare workers' experience, position, and perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 210-218.
    13. Stoddart, J.K. & Fallon, B. & Trocmé, N. & Fluke, J., 2018. "Substantiated Child Maltreatment: Which factors do workers focus on when making this critical decision?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Elizabeth Eggins & Sharon Dawe & David B. Wilson & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Joseph Betts, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Psychosocial, pharmacological and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    15. Karski, Ruth Lawrence, 1999. "Key decisions in child protective services: Report investigation and court referral," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 643-656, August.
    16. Bae, Hwa-ok & Solomon, Phyllis L. & Gelles, Richard J., 2009. "Multiple child maltreatment recurrence relative to single recurrence and no recurrence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 617-624, June.
    17. Mortensen, Jennifer A. & Barnett, Melissa A., 2016. "The role of child care in supporting the emotion regulatory needs of maltreated infants and toddlers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 73-81.
    18. King, Bryn & Black, Tara & Fallon, Barbara & Lung, Yu, 2021. "The role of risk in child welfare decision-making: A prospective cohort examination of families transferred to ongoing child protection services after an investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Esposito, Tonino & Chabot, Martin & Caldwell, Johanna & Webb, Calum & Delaye, Ashleigh & Fluke, John D. & Trocmé, Nico & Bywaters, Paul, 2022. "The differential association of socioeconomic vulnerabilities and neglect-related child protection involvement across geographies: Multilevel structural equation modeling," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Kearney, Aubrey D. & Wilson, Elisabeth S. & Hollinshead, Dana M. & Poletika, Michael & Kestian, Heather H. & Stigdon, Terry J. & Miller, Eric A. & Fluke, John D., 2023. "Child welfare triage: Use of screening threshold analysis to evaluate intake decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:129:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921002498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.