IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v122y2021ics0190740921000074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A post-reunification service model: Implementation and population served

Author

Listed:
  • Rushovich, Berenice
  • Sepulveda, Kristin
  • Efetevbia, Victoria
  • Malm, Karin

Abstract

Nationally, nearly half (49%) of all children removed from their parents’ home due to maltreatment subsequently return to live with their parents. However, families struggle to stay together after reunification, with between 20% and 40% of children re-entering foster care within 5 years (Font et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2012). Catawba County in North Carolina, recognizing that families often face multiple challenges and can benefit from an advocate and coach to help them build internal capacity and resilience, developed the Success Coach post-reunification program. Success Coaches work with families after a child is reunified with their family to help stabilize, build resiliency, and other protective factors within the family. In 2015 Catawba County expanded this service to five additional counties and initiated a randomized, controlled study, using a mixed-methods design, including both outcome and implementation components. Research questions focused on: 1) if children in families that received Success Coach services are less likely to be reported for subsequent maltreatment; 2) if children in families that received Success Coach services are less likely to re-enter care/return to agency custody; 3) if children in families that received Success Coach services are more likely to experience positive well-being; 4) factors that play a role in families’ decisions to participate in Success Coach services; and 5) other contextual factors, such as other services available in the community, that might affect outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rushovich, Berenice & Sepulveda, Kristin & Efetevbia, Victoria & Malm, Karin, 2021. "A post-reunification service model: Implementation and population served," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:122:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921000074
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.105928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740921000074
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.105928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Choi, Sam & Testa, Mark F., 2006. "Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1074-1087, September.
    2. Jonson-Reid, Melissa, 2003. "Foster Care and Future Risk of Maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 271-294, April.
    3. Davidson, Ryan D. & Tomlinson, Claire S. & Beck, Connie J. & Bowen, Anne M., 2019. "The revolving door of families in the child welfare system: Risk and protective factors associated with families returning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 468-479.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collins, Cyleste C. & Bai, Rong & Fischer, Robert & Crampton, David & Lalich, Nina & Liu, Chun & Chan, Tsui, 2020. "Housing instability and child welfare: Examining the delivery of innovative services in the context of a randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Barth, Richard P. & Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Green, Rebecca L., 2008. "Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 353-364, April.
    3. Elizabeth Eggins & David B. Wilson & Joseph Betts & Sara Roetman & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Bronwyn Theroux & Sharon Dawe, 2024. "Psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    4. Lecompte, Vanessa & Pascuzzo, Katherine & Hélie, Sonia, 2023. "A look inside family reunification for children with attachment difficulties: An exploratory study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Fuller, Tamara L., 2005. "Child safety at reunification: A case-control study of maltreatment recurrence following return home from substitute care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1293-1306, December.
    7. Buisson, Camille & Poitras, Karine & Joyal, Christian C., 2024. "Risk of child sexual abuse: A mixed-methods analysis of judicial decisions in the Youth Court of Québec," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Kahn, Jessica M. & Schwalbe, Craig, 2010. "The timing to and risk factors associated with child welfare system recidivism at two decision-making points," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1035-1044, July.
    9. Dare, Julie & Wilkinson, Celia & Karthigesu, Shantha P. & Coall, David A. & Marquis, Ruth, 2023. "Keeping the family: A socio-ecological perspective on the challenges of child removal and reunification for mothers who have experienced substance-related harms," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Estefan, Lianne Fuino & Coulter, Martha L. & VandeWeerd, Carla L. & Armstrong, Mary & Gorski, Peter, 2012. "Receiving mandated therapeutic services: Experiences of parents involved in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2353-2360.
    11. Grant, Therese & Huggins, Janet & Graham, J. Christopher & Ernst, Cara & Whitney, Nancy & Wilson, Dee, 2011. "Maternal substance abuse and disrupted parenting: Distinguishing mothers who keep their children from those who do not," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2176-2185.
    12. Lance Palmer & Vibha Bhargava, 2018. "Forms of Wealth Associated with Attaining Peer Group Net Worth Following Bankruptcy," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(1), pages 97-117, March.
    13. Yampolskaya, Svetlana & Sharrock, Patty & Armstrong, Mary I. & Strozier, Anne & Swanke, Jayme, 2014. "Profile of children placed in out-of-home care: Association with permanency outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 195-200.
    14. Antle, Becky F. & Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana N. & Sullivan, Dana J., 2009. "The prevention of child maltreatment recidivism through the Solution-Based Casework model of child welfare practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1346-1351, December.
    15. Huang, Hui & Ryan, Joseph P., 2011. "Trying to come home: Substance exposed infants, mothers, and family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 322-329, February.
    16. Wells, Kathleen & Marcenko, Maureen O., 2011. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Mothers of children in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 419-423, March.
    17. Wulczyn, Fred & Parolini, Arno & Schmits, Florie & Magruder, Joseph & Webster, Daniel, 2020. "Returning to foster care: Age and other risk factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Fantuzzo, John & Perlman, Staci, 2007. "The unique impact of out-of-home placement and the mediating effects of child maltreatment and homelessness on early school success," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 941-960, July.
    19. Kimberlin, Sara E. & Anthony, Elizabeth K. & Austin, Michael J., 2009. "Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 471-481, April.
    20. Font, Sarah A. & Warren, Emily J., 2013. "Inadequate housing and the child protection system response," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1809-1815.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:122:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921000074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.