IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v114y2020ics0190740920301328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The sins of the child: Public opinion about parental responsibility for juvenile crime

Author

Listed:
  • Aizpurua, Eva
  • Applegate, Brandon K.
  • Bolin, Riane M.
  • Vuk, Mateja
  • Ouellette, Heather M.

Abstract

Previous research indicates that people ascribe less responsibility to juvenile offenders than adult offenders for the crimes they have committed. Although assignment of responsibility to parents varies depending upon the youth’s age, we know little about the role of other factors. The current study used randomized factorial vignettes to examine whether the seriousness of the offense, peer involvement, and the offender's race, age, sex, and prior record influence support for parental responsibility. We found that participants in our study placed substantial responsibility on parents for dealing with juvenile offenders; however, support for punishing the parents was low, while the importance attached to enrolling parents in training was high. Views on parental responsibility were influenced by the age of the juvenile and the seriousness of the offense. The implications of these findings and how they fit in with previous work are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aizpurua, Eva & Applegate, Brandon K. & Bolin, Riane M. & Vuk, Mateja & Ouellette, Heather M., 2020. "The sins of the child: Public opinion about parental responsibility for juvenile crime," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:114:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920301328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920301328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stylianou, Stelios, 2003. "Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 37-56.
    2. Applegate, Brandon K. & Cullen, Francis T. & Fisher, Bonnie S., 2002. "Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 89-100.
    3. Brank, Eve M. & Weisz, Victoria, 2004. "Paying for the crimes of their children: Public support of parental responsibility," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 465-475.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trull-Oliva, Carme & Soler-Masó, Pere, 2021. "The opinion of young people who have committed violent child-to-parent crimes on factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flory, Christopher M. & May, David C. & Minor, Kevin I. & Wood, Peter B., 2006. "A comparison of punishment exchange rates between offenders under supervision and their supervising officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 39-50.
    2. Eugene C.X. Ikejemba & Peter C. Schuur, 2018. "Analyzing the Impact of Theft and Vandalism in Relation to the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Development Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Douhou, Salima & Magnus, Jan R. & van Soest, Arthur, 2011. "The perception of small crime," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 749-763.
    4. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 639-659, December.
    5. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    6. Cody Jorgensen, 2018. "Badges and Bongs: Police Officers’ Attitudes Toward Drugs," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    7. Douhou, S., 2012. "Essays on (small) crime : Perception, social norms, happiness, and prevention," Other publications TiSEM e1430ee4-a1db-471d-bb39-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Buckler, Kevin & Cullen, Francis T. & Unnever, James D., 2007. "Citizen assessment of local criminal courts: Does fairness matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-536.
    9. de Vries, Ieke & Farrell, Amy & Bouché, Vanessa & Wittmer-Wolfe, Dana E., 2020. "Crime frames and gender differences in the activation of crime concern and crime responses," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Carmen Sainz Villalba, 2023. "Paternalism Preferences: Differences Across Genders," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2023-03, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    11. Chanhoo Song & Seung Hun Han, 2017. "Stock Market Reaction to Corporate Crime: Evidence from South Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 323-351, June.
    12. Cochran, John K. & Sanders, Beth A., 2009. "The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 525-533, November.
    13. Mancini, Christina & Mears, Daniel P., 2010. "To execute or not to execute? Examining public support for capital punishment of sex offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 959-968, September.
    14. Cook, Carrie L. & Lane, Jodi, 2009. "The place of public fear in sentencing and correctional policy," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 586-595, November.
    15. Ingwer Borg & Dieter Hermann & Wolfgang Bilsky, 2023. "The perceived seriousness of crimes: inter-individual commonalities and differences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 765-784, February.
    16. Payne, Brian K. & Tewksbury, Richard & Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt, 2010. "Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 580-588, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:114:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920301328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.