IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v114y2020ics0190740919304736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child welfare approach in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Takaffoli, Marzieh
  • Arshi, Maliheh
  • Vameghi, Meroe
  • Mousavi, Mir Taher

Abstract

Nowadays, in addition to the family, society is also considered responsible for the upbringing and development of children. The degree to which governments hold parents responsible for ensuring their children’s well-being through child welfare services varies among countries. In Iran, children have become a growing concern among civil society and policy makers. There have been significant changes in recent decades. Therefore, Iran’s academic and political literature is required to provide an explicit definition for child welfare that facilitates comparison and identification of policies and practices. Thus, this study aimed to determine the approach to child welfare in Iran by reviewing Iran’s laws and macro policies, and analysing them based on Gilbert (1997) and Gilbert, Parton, and Skivenes (2011) classification in order to provide an explicit and comprehensive definition for child welfare. To achieve this goal, Iran's national laws and macro policies (a total of 55 documents) were analysed by directed qualitative content analysis. According to the findings, child support and protection services in Iran are similar to a previous child protection approach in terms of three main categories of “problem frame”, “state–parent relationship and the role of the state” and “the mode and aim of intervention”, although some features of other approaches are apparent. Although there is a great emphasis on the family institution in Iran, the executive laws are more focused on punishing parents than supporting and empowering them with regard to child protection. This coercive and risk management approach is particularly evident in the new legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Takaffoli, Marzieh & Arshi, Maliheh & Vameghi, Meroe & Mousavi, Mir Taher, 2020. "Child welfare approach in Iran," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:114:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919304736
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919304736
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilbert, Neil, 2012. "A comparative study of child welfare systems: Abstract orientations and concrete results," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 532-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bywaters, Paul & Brady, Geraldine & Sparks, Tim & Bos, Elizabeth & Bunting, Lisa & Daniel, Brigid & Featherstone, Brid & Morris, Kate & Scourfield, Jonathan, 2015. "Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-105.
    2. Garcia Quiroga, Manuela & Hamilton-Giachritsis, Catherine, 2014. "“In the name of the children”: Public policies for children in out-of-home care in Chile. Historical review, present situation and future challenges," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 422-430.
    3. Hidalgo, Victoria & Jiménez, Lucía & Grimaldi, Víctor & Ayala-Nunes, Lara & López-Verdugo, Isabel, 2018. "The effectiveness of a child day-care program in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 145-151.
    4. Venables, Jemma & Healy, Karen & Harrison, Gai, 2015. "From investigation to collaboration: Practitioner perspectives on the transition phase of parental agreements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 9-16.
    5. Hood, Rick & Goldacre, Allie, 2021. "Exploring the impact of Ofsted inspections on performance in children’s social care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Davies, Kate & Ross, Nicola & Cocks, Jessica & Foote, Wendy, 2023. "Family inclusion in child protection: Knowledge, power and resistance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Nigel Ashmore Parton, 2022. "Comparative Research and Critical Child Protection Studies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Lisbeth Loft, 2022. "The importance of child characteristics: children’s health and mothers’ subsequent childbearing," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 599-616, December.
    9. Portmann, Rahel & Mitrovic, Tanja & Gonthier, Hakim & Kosirnik, Céline & Knüsel, René & Jud, Andreas, 2022. "Do socio-structural factors influence the incidence and reporting of child neglect? An analysis of multi-sectoral national data from Switzerland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Thomas Akintayo, 2021. "Options for Africa’s Child Welfare Systems from Nigeria’s Unsustainable Multicultural Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Elizabeth Eggins & David B. Wilson & Joseph Betts & Sara Roetman & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Bronwyn Theroux & Sharon Dawe, 2024. "Psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    12. Bilson, Andy & Munro, Elizabeth Hunter, 2019. "Adoption and child protection trends for children aged under five in England: Increasing investigations and hidden separation of children from their parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 204-211.
    13. Borgen, Nicolai T. & Frønes, Ivar & Raaum, Oddbjørn, 2023. "Every tenth child: Heterogeneity in characteristics and life-course patterns among children in contact with child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Lara Ayala-Nunes & Lucía Jiménez & Saul Jesus & Cristina Nunes & Victoria Hidalgo, 2018. "A Ecological Model of Well-Being in Child Welfare Referred Children," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 811-836, November.
    15. Witte, Susanne, 2020. "Case file analyses in child protection research: Review of methodological challenges and development of a framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Adema, Willem, 2012. "Setting the scene: The mix of family policy objectives and packages across the OECD," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 487-498.
    17. Emily Keddell & Gabrielle Davie, 2018. "Inequalities and Child Protection System Contact in Aotearoa New Zealand: Developing a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Semanchin Jones, Annette & Kim, JaeRan & Hill, Katharine & Diebold, Josal, 2018. "Voluntary placements in child welfare: A comparative analysis of state statutes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 387-394.
    19. Schönfelder, Walter & Holmgaard, Sanne, 2019. "Representations of child welfare services in Norwegian, Danish and German newspapers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 89-97.
    20. Davidson, Ryan D. & Tomlinson, Claire S. & Beck, Connie J. & Bowen, Anne M., 2019. "The revolving door of families in the child welfare system: Risk and protective factors associated with families returning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 468-479.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:114:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919304736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.