IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i9p2830-2836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Split variable selection for tree modeling on rank data

Author

Listed:
  • Kung, Yi-Hung
  • Lin, Chang-Ting
  • Shih, Yu-Shan

Abstract

A variable selection method for constructing decision trees with rank data is proposed. It utilizes conditional independence tests based on loglinear models for contingency tables. Compared with other selection methods, our method is computationally more efficient. Moreover, our method is relatively unbiased and powerful in selecting the correct split variables. Simulation results and a real data study are given to demonstrate the strength of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Kung, Yi-Hung & Lin, Chang-Ting & Shih, Yu-Shan, 2012. "Split variable selection for tree modeling on rank data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 2830-2836.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:9:p:2830-2836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947312001168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2012.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Paul H. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2010. "Distance-based tree models for ranking data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1672-1682, June.
    2. Shieh, Grace S., 1998. "A weighted Kendall's tau statistic," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 17-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Shih & Kuang-Hsun Liu, 2019. "Regression trees for detecting preference patterns from rank data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 683-702, September.
    2. Hapfelmeier, A. & Ulm, K., 2014. "Variable selection by Random Forests using data with missing values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 129-139.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Paul H. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2012. "Mixtures of weighted distance-based models for ranking data with applications in political studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2486-2500.
    2. Tahani Coolen-Maturi, 2016. "New weighted rank correlation coefficients sensitive to agreement on top and bottom rankings," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(12), pages 2261-2279, September.
    3. Fuchs Sebastian & McCord Yann, 2019. "On the lower bound of Spearman’s footrule," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 126-132, January.
    4. Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julian & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2020. "Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-348.
    5. Akbari, Sina & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2023. "Beyond kemeny rank aggregation: A parameterizable-penalty framework for robust ranking aggregation with ties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Antonella Plaia & Simona Buscemi & Johannes Fürnkranz & Eneldo Loza Mencía, 2022. "Comparing Boosting and Bagging for Decision Trees of Rankings," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(1), pages 78-99, March.
    7. Jianbo Li & Minggao Gu & Tao Hu, 2012. "General partially linear varying-coefficient transformation models for ranking data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1475-1488, January.
    8. Pinto Da Costa, Joaquim & Roque, Luís A.C. & Soares, Carlos, 2015. "The weighted rank correlation coefficient rW2 in the case of ties," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 20-26.
    9. Cascón, J.M. & González-Arteaga, T. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2022. "A new preference classification approach: The λ-dissensus cluster algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Antonio D’Ambrosio & Carmela Iorio & Michele Staiano & Roberta Siciliano, 2019. "Median constrained bucket order rank aggregation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 787-802, June.
    11. Jie Lin & Donald A. Adjeroh & Bing-Hua Jiang & Yue Jiang, 2018. "fastWKendall: an efficient algorithm for weighted Kendall correlation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1823-1845, December.
    12. Ghimire, Ramesh & Green, Gary T. & Paudel, Krishna P. & Poudyal, Neelam C. & Cordell, H. Ken, 2017. "Visitors' Preferences for Freshwater Amenity Characteristics: Implications from the U.S. Household Survey," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Antonella Plaia & Mariangela Sciandra, 2019. "Weighted distance-based trees for ranking data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 427-444, June.
    14. Yu-Shan Shih & Kuang-Hsun Liu, 2019. "Regression trees for detecting preference patterns from rank data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 683-702, September.
    15. Antonio D’Ambrosio & Willem J. Heiser, 2016. "A Recursive Partitioning Method for the Prediction of Preference Rankings Based Upon Kemeny Distances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 774-794, September.
    16. Wei-Yin Loh, 2014. "Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 329-348, December.
    17. Dongyun Nie & Michael Scriney & Xiaoning Liang & Mark Roantree, 2024. "From data acquisition to validation: a complete workflow for predicting individual customer lifetime value," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 321-341, June.
    18. Farzad Farnoud & Eitan Yaakobi & Jehoshua Bruck, 2016. "Approximate sorting of data streams with limited storage," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1133-1164, November.
    19. Agostino Tarsitano & Rosetta Lombardo, 2011. "An Exhaustive Coefficient Of Rank Correlation," Working Papers 201111, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    20. Krishna Paudel & Mahesh Pandit & Michael Dunn, 2013. "Using spectral analysis and multinomial logit regression to explain households’ choice patterns," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 739-760, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:9:p:2830-2836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.