IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i2p1029-1040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of spatially adaptive smoothing splines via parameterization of smoothing parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Jang, Dongik
  • Oh, Hee-Seok

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of estimating curve and surface functions when the structures of an unknown function vary spatially. Classical approaches such as using smoothing splines, which are controlled by a single smoothing parameter, are inefficient in estimating the underlying function that consists of different spatial structures. In this paper, we propose a blockwise method of fitting smoothing splines wherein the smoothing parameter [lambda] varies spatially, in order to accommodate possible spatial nonhomogeneity of the regression function. A key feature of the proposed blockwise method is the parameterization of a smoothing parameter function [lambda](x) that produces a continuous spatially adaptive fit over the entire range of design points. The proposed parameterization requires two important ingredients: (1) a blocking scheme that divides the data into several blocks according to the degree of spatial variation of the data; and (2) a method for choosing smoothing parameters of blocks. We propose a block selection approach that is based on the adaptive thinning algorithm and a choice of smoothing parameters that minimize a newly defined blockwise risk. The results obtained from numerical experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Jang, Dongik & Oh, Hee-Seok, 2011. "Enhancement of spatially adaptive smoothing splines via parameterization of smoothing parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1029-1040, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:2:p:1029-1040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00323-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Pintore & Paul Speckman & Chris C. Holmes, 2006. "Spatially adaptive smoothing splines," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(1), pages 113-125, March.
    2. M. P. Wand, 2000. "A Comparison of Regression Spline Smoothing Procedures," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 443-462, December.
    3. Lee, Thomas C. M., 2003. "Smoothing parameter selection for smoothing splines: a simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 139-148, February.
    4. Lee, Thomas C. M., 2004. "Improved smoothing spline regression by combining estimates of different smoothness," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 133-140, April.
    5. Clifford M. Hurvich & Jeffrey S. Simonoff & Chih‐Ling Tsai, 1998. "Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 271-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Xosé Rodríguez‐Álvarez & María Durbán & Paul H.C. Eilers & Dae‐Jin Lee & Francisco Gonzalez, 2023. "Multidimensional adaptive P‐splines with application to neurons' activity studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1972-1985, September.
    2. Dongik Jang & Hee-Seok Oh & Philippe Naveau, 2017. "Identifying local smoothness for spatially inhomogeneous functions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1115-1138, September.
    3. Yang, Lianqiang & Hong, Yongmiao, 2017. "Adaptive penalized splines for data smoothing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 70-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaeji Lim & Hee-Seok Oh & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2019. "Multiscale Clustering for Functional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 368-391, July.
    2. Malloy, Elizabeth J. & Spiegelman, Donna & Eisen, Ellen A., 2009. "Comparing measures of model selection for penalized splines in Cox models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2605-2616, May.
    3. Lee, Thomas C. M., 2004. "Improved smoothing spline regression by combining estimates of different smoothness," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 133-140, April.
    4. Leitenstorfer, Florian & Tutz, Gerhard, 2007. "Knot selection by boosting techniques," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4605-4621, May.
    5. Dongik Jang & Hee-Seok Oh & Philippe Naveau, 2017. "Identifying local smoothness for spatially inhomogeneous functions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1115-1138, September.
    6. Dursun AYDIN & Ersin YILMAZ, 2017. "Bandwidth Selection Problem for Nonparametric Regression Model with Right-Censored Data," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(2), pages 81-104, June.
    7. Eduardo L. Montoya, 2020. "On the Number of Independent Pieces of Information in a Functional Linear Model with a Scalar Response," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Yu Yue & Paul Speckman & Dongchu Sun, 2012. "Priors for Bayesian adaptive spline smoothing," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(3), pages 577-613, June.
    9. Nielsen, J.D. & Dean, C.B., 2008. "Adaptive functional mixed NHPP models for the analysis of recurrent event panel data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3670-3685, March.
    10. Kim, Young-Ju, 2011. "A comparative study of nonparametric estimation in Weibull regression: A penalized likelihood approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1884-1896, April.
    11. Lee, Thomas C. M., 2003. "Smoothing parameter selection for smoothing splines: a simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 139-148, February.
    12. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    13. Don Harding, 2010. "Applying shape and phase restrictions in generalized dynamic categorical models of the business cycle," NCER Working Paper Series 58, National Centre for Econometric Research.
    14. Michael S. Delgado & Daniel J. Henderson & Christopher F. Parmeter, 2014. "Does Education Matter for Economic Growth?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(3), pages 334-359, June.
    15. Juan Manuel Julio & Norberto Rodríguez & Héctor Manuel Zárate, 2005. "Estimating the COP Exchange Rate Volatility Smile and the Market Effect of Central Bank Interventions: A CHARN Approach," Borradores de Economia 2605, Banco de la Republica.
    16. Karimu, Amin & Brännlund, Runar, 2013. "Functional form and aggregate energy demand elasticities: A nonparametric panel approach for 17 OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 19-27.
    17. Liao, Jun & Zou, Guohua, 2020. "Corrected Mallows criterion for model averaging," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Lu, Jun & Lin, Lu, 2018. "Feature screening for multi-response varying coefficient models with ultrahigh dimensional predictors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 242-254.
    19. Chu, Chi-Yang & Henderson, Daniel J. & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2017. "On discrete Epanechnikov kernel functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 79-105.
    20. Salvatore Ingrassia & Simona Minotti & Giorgio Vittadini, 2012. "Local Statistical Modeling via a Cluster-Weighted Approach with Elliptical Distributions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 29(3), pages 363-401, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:2:p:1029-1040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.