IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i2p575-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An alternative specification of generalized linear mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • Sartori, N.
  • Severini, T.A.
  • Marras, E.

Abstract

Consider stratified data in which Yi1,...,Yini denote real-valued response variables corresponding to the observations from stratum i, i=1,...,m and suppose that Yij follows an exponential family distribution with canonical parameter of the form [theta]ij=xij[beta]+[gamma]i. In analyzing data of this type, the stratum-specific parameters are often modeled as random effects; a commonly-used approach is to assume that [gamma]1,...,[gamma]m are independent, identically distributed random variables. The purpose of this paper is to consider an alternative approach to defining the random effects, in which the stratum means of the response variable are assumed to be independent and identically distributed, with a distribution not depending on [beta]. It will be shown that inferences about [beta] based on this formulation of the generalized linear mixed model have many desirable properties. For instance, inferences regarding [beta] are less sensitive to the choice of random effects distribution, are less subject to bias from omitted stratum-level covariates and are less affected by separate between- and within-cluster covariate effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sartori, N. & Severini, T.A. & Marras, E., 2010. "An alternative specification of generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 575-584, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:2:p:575-584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00360-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Neuhaus & Charles E. McCulloch, 2006. "Separating between‐ and within‐cluster covariate effects by using conditional and partitioning methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(5), pages 859-872, November.
    2. N. Sartori, 2003. "Modified profile likelihoods in models with stratum nuisance parameters," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(3), pages 533-549, September.
    3. Thomas A. Severini, 2007. "Integrated likelihood functions for non-Bayesian inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(3), pages 529-542.
    4. Komárek, Arnost & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 2008. "Generalized linear mixed model with a penalized Gaussian mixture as a random effects distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3441-3458, March.
    5. Patrick J. Heagerty, 1999. "Marginally Specified Logistic-Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 688-698, September.
    6. Evans, Michael & Swartz, Timothy, 2000. "Approximating Integrals via Monte Carlo and Deterministic Methods," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198502784, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pakel, Cavit, 2019. "Bias reduction in nonlinear and dynamic panels in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 459-492.
    2. Schumann, Martin & Severini, Thomas A. & Tripathi, Gautam, 2023. "The role of score and information bias in panel data likelihoods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1215-1238.
    3. Ruggero Bellio & Annamaria Guolo, 2016. "Integrated Likelihood Inference in Small Sample Meta-analysis for Continuous Outcomes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 191-201, March.
    4. Giuliana Cortese & Nicola Sartori, 2016. "Integrated likelihoods in parametric survival models for highly clustered censored data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 382-404, July.
    5. Tanya P. Garcia & Yanyuan Ma, 2016. "Optimal Estimator for Logistic Model with Distribution-free Random Intercept," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 156-171, March.
    6. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2022. "The Role of Conditional Likelihoods in Latent Variable Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 799-834, September.
    7. Luigi Pace & Alessandra Salvan & Laura Ventura, 2011. "Adjustments of profile likelihood through predictive densities," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(5), pages 923-937, October.
    8. De Bin, Riccardo, 2016. "On the equivalence between conditional and random-effects likelihoods in exponential families," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 34-38.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m052g20qh is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard & Robert F. Engle, 2021. "Fitting Vast Dimensional Time-Varying Covariance Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 652-668, July.
    11. John M. Neuhaus & Alastair J. Scott & Christopher J. Wild & Yannan Jiang & Charles E. McCulloch & Ross Boylan, 2014. "Likelihood-based analysis of longitudinal data from outcome-related sampling designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 44-52, March.
    12. Quinn N. Lathrop & Ying Cheng, 2017. "Item Cloning Variation and the Impact on the Parameters of Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 245-263, March.
    13. Alfò, Marco & Carbonari, Lorenzo & Trovato, Giovanni, 2023. "On the effects of taxation on growth: an empirical assessment," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(5), pages 1289-1318, July.
    14. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2009. "Nuisance parameters, composite likelihoods and a panel of GARCH models," OFRC Working Papers Series 2009fe03, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    15. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    16. repec:jss:jstsof:33:i11 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Dhaene, Geert & Jochmans, Koen, 2016. "Likelihood Inference In An Autoregression With Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1178-1215, October.
    18. Schumann, Martin & Severini, Thomas A. & Tripathi, Gautam, 2021. "Integrated likelihood based inference for nonlinear panel data models with unobserved effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 73-95.
    19. J. E. Mills & C. A. Field & D. J. Dupuis, 2002. "Marginally Specified Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Robust Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 727-734, December.
    20. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    21. Kenneth J. Wilkins & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, 2006. "A Hybrid Model for Nonignorable Dropout in Longitudinal Binary Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 168-176, March.
    22. Johannes S. Kunz & Kevin E. Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2021. "Predicting individual effects in fixed effects panel probit models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 1109-1145, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:2:p:575-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.