IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i7p2673-2692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric analysis of randomized response data with missing covariates in logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • Hsieh, S.H.
  • Lee, S.M.
  • Shen, P.S.

Abstract

In this article, two semiparametric approaches are developed for analyzing randomized response data with missing covariates in logistic regression model. One of the two proposed estimators is an extension of the validation likelihood estimator of Breslow and Cain [Breslow, N.E., and Cain, K.C. 1988. Logistic regression for two-stage case-control data. Biometrika. 75, 11-20]. The other is a joint conditional likelihood estimator based on both validation and non-validation data sets. We present a large sample theory for the proposed estimators. Simulation results show that the joint conditional likelihood estimator is more efficient than the validation likelihood estimator, weighted estimator, complete-case estimator and partial likelihood estimator. We also illustrate the methods using data from a cable TV study.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsieh, S.H. & Lee, S.M. & Shen, P.S., 2009. "Semiparametric analysis of randomized response data with missing covariates in logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2673-2692, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:2673-2692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00007-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. You-Gan Wang, 1999. "Estimating Equations with Nonignorably Missing Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 984-989, September.
    2. Jun-Wu Yu & Guo-Liang Tian & Man-Lai Tang, 2008. "Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: design and analysis," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 251-263, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei-Chieh Chang & Kim-Hung Pho & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li, 2021. "Estimation of parameters of logistic regression for two-stage randomized response technique," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2111-2133, September.
    2. Shen‐Ming Lee & Truong‐Nhat Le & Phuoc‐Loc Tran & Chin‐Shang Li, 2022. "Investigating the association of a sensitive attribute with a random variable using the Christofides generalised randomised response design and Bayesian methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1471-1502, November.
    3. Buu-Chau Truong & Nguyen Van Thuan & Nguyen Huu Hau & Michael McAleer, 2019. "Applications of the Newton-Raphson Method in Decision Sciences and Education," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(4), pages 52-80, December.
    4. Kim-Hung Pho & Michael McAleer, 2021. "Specification and Estimation of a Logistic Function, with Applications in the Sciences and Social Sciences," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(2), pages 74-104, June.
    5. Truong-Nhat Le & Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Randomized Response Techniques: A Systematic Review from the Pioneering Work of Warner (1965) to the Present," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Shu-Hui Hsieh & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li, 2022. "A Two-stage Multilevel Randomized Response Technique With Proportional Odds Models and Missing Covariates," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(1), pages 439-467, February.
    7. Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Truong-Nhat Le & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Prediction of a Sensitive Feature under Indirect Questioning via Warner’s Randomized Response Technique and Latent Class Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Shen-Ming Lee & T. Martin Lukusa & Chin-Shang Li, 2020. "Estimation of a zero-inflated Poisson regression model with missing covariates via nonparametric multiple imputation methods," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 725-754, June.
    9. Shu-Hui Hsieh & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li & Su-Hao Tu, 2016. "An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 601-621, November.
    10. T. Martin Lukusa & Shen-Ming Lee & Chin-Shang Li, 2016. "Semiparametric estimation of a zero-inflated Poisson regression model with missing covariates," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 457-483, May.
    11. Kim-Hung Pho & Tuan-Kiet Tran & Thi Diem-Chinh Ho & Wing-Keung Wong, 2019. "Optimal Solution Techniques in Decision Sciences A Review," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(1), pages 114-161, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Barros, 2012. "Sustainable Tourism in Inhambane-Mozambique," CEsA Working Papers 105, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    2. Andreas Lagerås & Mathias Lindholm, 2020. "How to ask sensitive multiple‐choice questions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(2), pages 397-424, June.
    3. Burgstaller, Lilith & Feld, Lars P. & Pfeil, Katharina, 2022. "Working in the shadow: Survey techniques for measuring and explaining undeclared work," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 661-671.
    4. Kazuo Yamaguchi, 2016. "Cross-sectional and Panel Data Analyses of an Incompletely Observed Variable Derived From the Nonrandomized Method for Surveying Sensitive Questions," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(1), pages 41-68, February.
    5. Pavel Dietz & Anne Quermann & Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel & Heiko Striegel & Hannes Schröter & Rolf Ulrich & Perikles Simon, 2018. "Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Horng-Jinh Chang & Mei-Pei Kuo, 2012. "Estimation of population proportion in randomized response sampling using weighted confidence interval construction," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(5), pages 655-672, July.
    7. Mario Bossler & Christopher Osiander & Julia Schmidtke & Mark Trappmann, 2023. "Free riding on short‐time work allowances? Results from an experimental survey design," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(4), pages 882-901, November.
    8. Pier Francesco Perri & Eleni Manoli & Tasos C. Christofides, 2023. "Assessing the effectiveness of indirect questioning techniques by detecting liars," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 1483-1506, October.
    9. Marc Höglinger & Ben Jann, 2018. "More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Carlos Barros & Vera Barros & Peter Dieke, 2012. "Tourism and Human Development in Mozambique: an analysis for Inhambane province," CEsA Working Papers 100, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    11. Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Truong-Nhat Le & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Prediction of a Sensitive Feature under Indirect Questioning via Warner’s Randomized Response Technique and Latent Class Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Julia Meisters & Adrian Hoffmann & Jochen Musch, 2020. "Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Walzenbach, Sandra & Hinz, Thomas, 2022. "Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions - Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Primacy Effects and Learning Effects," EconStor Preprints 249353, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Geoff Kaine & Vic Wright, 2024. "Social Desirability Bias and the Prevalence of Self-Reported Conservation Behaviour Among Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Ulrich Thy Jensen, 2020. "Is self-reported social distancing susceptible to social desirability bias? Using the crosswise model to elicit sensitive behaviors," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).
    16. Guo-Liang Tian, 2014. "A new non-randomized response model: The parallel model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(4), pages 293-323, November.
    17. Ivar Krumpal & Thomas Voss, 2020. "Sensitive Questions and Trust: Explaining Respondents’ Behavior in Randomized Response Surveys," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    18. Arnab Raghunath & Shangodoyin Dahud Kehinde & Arcos Antonio, 2019. "Nonrandomized Response Model For Complex Survey Designs," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(1), pages 67-86, March.
    19. Kirchner Antje, 2015. "Validating Sensitive Questions: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(1), pages 31-59, March.
    20. Qiu, Shi-Fang & Zou, G.Y. & Tang, Man-Lai, 2014. "Sample size determination for estimating prevalence and a difference between two prevalences of sensitive attributes using the non-randomized triangular design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-169.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:2673-2692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.