IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i6p2055-2060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving models with inequalities using standard econometric software

Author

Listed:
  • ten Cate, Arie

Abstract

Simultaneouseconometric models may contain pairs of complementary inequalities. It is discussed how to reformulate such models and solve them with econometric software which can handle only equalities. Two approaches are applied: the normal map representation and the Fischer-Burmeister NCP function. The latter seems to work best. The software programs TSP, SAS/ETS and EViews are tested. The test model describes two markets for electricity, each with fluctuating demand and an endogenous production capacity; the capacity of the trade link between the regions is also endogenous.

Suggested Citation

  • ten Cate, Arie, 2009. "Solving models with inequalities using standard econometric software," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 2055-2060, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:6:p:2055-2060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00069-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drud, Arne, 1983. "A survey of model representations and simulation algorithms in some existing modeling systems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 5-35, February.
    2. Stephen M. Robinson, 1992. "Normal Maps Induced by Linear Transformations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 691-714, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert J. Baraldi & Drew P. Kouri, 2025. "Efficient proximal subproblem solvers for a nonsmooth trust-region method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 193-226, January.
    2. Baohua Huang & Wen Li, 2023. "A smoothing Newton method based on the modulus equation for a class of weakly nonlinear complementarity problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 345-381, September.
    3. J. Han & D. Sun, 1997. "Newton and Quasi-Newton Methods for Normal Maps with Polyhedral Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 659-676, September.
    4. Alexander Shapiro, 2005. "Sensitivity Analysis of Parameterized Variational Inequalities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 109-126, February.
    5. Chen, Dean T. & Dharmaratne, Gerard, 1990. "Farm Price Determination in Structural Models: Implications of Quantity-Dependent and Price-Dependent Specifications," Research Reports 257906, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    6. Zhengyong Zhou & Yunchan Peng, 2019. "The locally Chen–Harker–Kanzow–Smale smoothing functions for mixed complementarity problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 169-193, May.
    7. Charles G. Renfro, 2009. "The Practice of Econometric Theory," Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, Springer, number 978-3-540-75571-5, February.
    8. Jong-Shi Pang & Defeng Sun & Jie Sun, 2003. "Semismooth Homeomorphisms and Strong Stability of Semidefinite and Lorentz Complementarity Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 39-63, February.
    9. Shu Lu & Amarjit Budhiraja, 2013. "Confidence Regions for Stochastic Variational Inequalities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 545-568, August.
    10. Shu Lu, 2008. "Sensitivity of Static Traffic User Equilibria with Perturbations in Arc Cost Function and Travel Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 105-123, February.
    11. Ferris, Michael C. & Munson, Todd S., 2000. "Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 165-188, February.
    12. Shu Lu, 2010. "Variational Conditions Under the Constant Rank Constraint Qualification," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 120-139, February.
    13. Todd S. Munson & Francisco Facchinei & Michael C. Ferris & Andreas Fischer & Christian Kanzow, 2001. "The Semismooth Algorithm for Large Scale Complementarity Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 294-311, November.
    14. S. H. Pan & Y. X. Jiang, 2008. "Smoothing Newton Method for Minimizing the Sum of p-Norms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 255-275, May.
    15. L. Qi & D. Sun, 2002. "Smoothing Functions and Smoothing Newton Method for Complementarity and Variational Inequality Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 121-147, April.
    16. Zhengyong Zhou & Bo Yu, 2014. "A smoothing homotopy method for variational inequality problems on polyhedral convex sets," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 151-168, January.
    17. Stephen M. Robinson, 2016. "Reduction of affine variational inequalities," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 493-509, November.
    18. W. Morrow, 2015. "Finite purchasing power and computations of Bertrand–Nash equilibrium prices," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 477-515, November.
    19. Michael Patriksson & R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2002. "A Mathematical Model and Descent Algorithm for Bilevel Traffic Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 271-291, August.
    20. Roman Sznajder & M. Seetharama Gowda, 1998. "Nondegeneracy Concepts for Zeros of Piecewise Smooth Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 221-238, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:6:p:2055-2060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.