IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v31y1999i2p227-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of a mixture likelihood method and the EM algorithm for an estimation problem in animal carcinogenicity studies

Author

Listed:
  • Moon, Hojin
  • Ahn, Hongshik
  • Kodell, Ralph L.
  • Pearce, Bruce A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Moon, Hojin & Ahn, Hongshik & Kodell, Ralph L. & Pearce, Bruce A., 1999. "A comparison of a mixture likelihood method and the EM algorithm for an estimation problem in animal carcinogenicity studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 227-238, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:31:y:1999:i:2:p:227-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(99)00011-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen W. Lagakos & Thomas A. Louis, 1988. "Use of Tumour Lethality to Interpret Tumorigenicity Experiments Lacking Cause‐Of‐Death Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 37(2), pages 169-179, June.
    2. S. W. Lagakos & Louise M. Ryan, 1985. "On the Representativeness Assumption in Prevalence Tests of Carcinogenicity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 34(1), pages 54-62, March.
    3. Linda E. Archer & Louise M. Ryan, 1989. "On the Role of Cause‐Of‐Death Data in the Analysis of Rodent Tumorigenicity Experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 38(1), pages 81-93, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, I. S. F. & Hillman, D. & Louis, T. A., 1998. "Treatment comparisons with screenable endpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 401-419, June.
    2. William J. Reed, 2011. "A flexible parametric survival model which allows a bathtub-shaped hazard rate function," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 1665-1680, August.
    3. Li, Shuwei & Hu, Tao & Wang, Peijie & Sun, Jianguo, 2017. "Regression analysis of current status data in the presence of dependent censoring with applications to tumorigenicity experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 75-86.
    4. Sanjib Basu & Ram C. Tiwari, 2010. "Breast cancer survival, competing risks and mixture cure model: a Bayesian analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(2), pages 307-329, April.
    5. Mazucheli, Josmar & Louzada-Neto, Francisco & Achcar, Jorge A., 2001. "Bayesian inference for polyhazard models in the presence of covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Kozumi, Hideo, 2004. "Posterior analysis of latent competing risk models by parallel tempering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 441-458, June.
    7. Ahn, Hongshik & Moon, Hojin & Kim, Sunyoung & Kodell, Ralph L., 2002. "A Newton-based approach for attributing tumor lethality in animal carcinogenicity studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 263-283, January.
    8. Francisco Louzada-Neto, 1999. "Polyhazard Models for Lifetime Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1281-1285, December.
    9. Jessica Y. Mancuso & Hongshik Ahn & James J. Chen & James P. Mancuso, 2002. "Age-Adjusted Exact Trend Tests in the Event of Rare Occurrences," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 403-412, June.
    10. Ma, Ling & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2016. "Cox regression analysis of dependent interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 79-90.
    11. Christopher J. Portier & David G. Hoel, 1987. "Issues Concerning the Estimation of the TD50," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 437-447, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:31:y:1999:i:2:p:227-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.