IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v173y2022ics0167947322000883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe sample screening rules for multicategory angle-based support vector machines

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Yiwei
  • Zhao, Junlong

Abstract

Support vector machines are popular techniques for classification problems, where the optimal separating hyperplane only depends on a subset of training data. To reduce computational costs, safe sample screening rules are proposed in the literature, which enable us to remove redundant samples prior to the training phase. However, existing works on safe sample screening rules mainly focus on binary classification. The multicategory angle-based support vector machine (MASVM) is a computationally efficient method for multicategory classification problems, which constructs a decision function without the sum-to-zero constraint. To further reduce computational costs in linear MASVM, two safe sample screening methods are proposed: the gap safe rule (MAGSR) and the dual screening with variational inequalities (MADVI). A two-stage screening framework combining MAGSR and MADVI together is then developed. Extensive simulations and real applications show the great advantage of the proposed methods in computation, compared with existing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Yiwei & Zhao, Junlong, 2022. "Safe sample screening rules for multicategory angle-based support vector machines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:173:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322000883
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947322000883
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2022.107508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingqi Zhao & Donglin Zeng & A. John Rush & Michael R. Kosorok, 2012. "Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1106-1118, September.
    2. Chong Zhang & Yufeng Liu, 2014. "Multicategory angle-based large-margin classification," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(3), pages 625-640.
    3. Wang, Lifeng & Shen, Xiaotong, 2007. "On L1-Norm Multiclass Support Vector Machines: Methodology and Theory," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 583-594, June.
    4. Lee, Yoonkyung & Lin, Yi & Wahba, Grace, 2004. "Multicategory Support Vector Machines: Theory and Application to the Classification of Microarray Data and Satellite Radiance Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 67-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang Yao & Yichao Wu & Jialin Zou, 2016. "Probability-enhanced effective dimension reduction for classifying sparse functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Zhilan Lou & Jun Shao & Menggang Yu, 2018. "Optimal treatment assignment to maximize expected outcome with multiple treatments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 506-516, June.
    3. Yang, Yi & Guo, Yuxuan & Chang, Xiangyu, 2021. "Angle-based cost-sensitive multicategory classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Crystal T. Nguyen & Daniel J. Luckett & Anna R. Kahkoska & Grace E. Shearrer & Donna Spruijt‐Metz & Jaimie N. Davis & Michael R. Kosorok, 2020. "Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 778-788, September.
    5. Fu, Sheng & Zhang, Sanguo & Liu, Yufeng, 2018. "Adaptively weighted large-margin angle-based classifiers," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 282-299.
    6. Park, Beomjin & Park, Changyi, 2021. "Kernel variable selection for multicategory support vector machines," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Park, Beomjin & Park, Changyi, 2023. "Multiclass Laplacian support vector machine with functional analysis of variance decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Fang Yao & Yichao Wu & Jialin Zou, 2016. "Probability-enhanced effective dimension reduction for classifying sparse functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Jin Wang & Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2022. "Semiparametric single-index models for optimal treatment regimens with censored outcomes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 744-763, October.
    10. Chong Zhang & Yufeng Liu, 2016. "Comments on: Probability enhanced effective dimension reduction for classifying sparse functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 44-46, March.
    11. Ying Huang & Youyi Fong, 2014. "Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection via a robust kernel method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 891-901, December.
    12. Yan Liu, 2022. "Policy Learning under Endogeneity Using Instrumental Variables," Papers 2206.09883, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    13. Roland A. Matsouaka & Junlong Li & Tianxi Cai, 2014. "Evaluating marker-guided treatment selection strategies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 489-499, September.
    14. Xin Qiu & Donglin Zeng & Yuanjia Wang, 2018. "Estimation and evaluation of linear individualized treatment rules to guarantee performance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 517-528, June.
    15. Yiwang Zhou & Peter X.K. Song & Haoda Fu, 2021. "Net benefit index: Assessing the influence of a biomarker for individualized treatment rules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1254-1264, December.
    16. Ruoqing Zhu & Ying-Qi Zhao & Guanhua Chen & Shuangge Ma & Hongyu Zhao, 2017. "Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 391-400, June.
    17. Benítez-Peña, Sandra & Blanquero, Rafael & Carrizosa, Emilio & Ramírez-Cobo, Pepa, 2024. "Cost-sensitive probabilistic predictions for support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 268-279.
    18. Eric B. Laber & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Marie Davidian & Shannon T. Holloway, 2014. "Discussion of “Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendation”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 707-710, September.
    19. Yumou Qiu & Jing Tao & Xiao‐Hua Zhou, 2021. "Inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data with high‐dimensional covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1016-1043, November.
    20. Peng Wu & Donglin Zeng & Haoda Fu & Yuanjia Wang, 2020. "On using electronic health records to improve optimal treatment rules in randomized trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1075-1086, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:173:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322000883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.