IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v148y2020ics0167947320300475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic identification of curve shapes with applications to ultrasonic vocalization

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Zhikun
  • Tang, Yanlin
  • Wang, Huixia Judy
  • Wu, Guangying K.
  • Lin, Jeff

Abstract

Like human beings, many animals produce sounds for communication and social interactions. The vocalizations of mice have the characteristics of songs, consisting of syllables of different types determined by the frequency modulations and structure variations. To characterize the impact of social environments and genotypes on vocalizations, it is important to identify the patterns of syllables based on the shapes of frequency contours. Using existing hypothesis testing methods to determine the shape classes would require testing various null and alternative hypotheses for each curve, and is impractical for vocalization studies where the interest is on a large number of frequency contours. A new penalization-based method is proposed, which provides function estimation and automatic shape identification simultaneously. The method estimates the functional curve through quadratic B-spline approximation, and captures the shape feature by penalizing the positive and negative parts of the first two derivatives of the spline function in a group manner. It is shown that under some regularity conditions, the proposed method can identify the correct shape with probability approaching one, and the resulting nonparametric estimator can achieve the optimal convergence rate. Simulation shows that the proposed method gives more stable curve estimation and more accurate curve classification than the unconstrained B-spline estimator, and it is competitive to the shape-constrained estimator assuming prior knowledge of the curve shape. The proposed method is applied to the motivating vocalization study to examine the effect of Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 gene on the vocalizations of mice during courtship.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Zhikun & Tang, Yanlin & Wang, Huixia Judy & Wu, Guangying K. & Lin, Jeff, 2020. "Automatic identification of curve shapes with applications to ultrasonic vocalization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:148:y:2020:i:c:s0167947320300475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.106956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947320300475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.106956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, J. & Ghosh, S.K., 2012. "Shape restricted nonparametric regression with Bernstein polynomials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 2729-2741.
    2. I. Gijbels & M. A. Ibrahim & A. Verhasselt, 2017. "Shape testing in quantile varying coefficient models with heteroscedastic error," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 391-406, April.
    3. Yatchew, Adonis & Hardle, Wolfgang, 2006. "Nonparametric state price density estimation using constrained least squares and the bootstrap," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 579-599, August.
    4. Shen, Xiaotong & Huang, Hsin-Cheng, 2006. "Optimal Model Assessment, Selection, and Combination," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 554-568, June.
    5. Robert Tibshirani & Keith Knight, 1999. "The Covariance Inflation Criterion for Adaptive Model Selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(3), pages 529-546.
    6. Gallant, A. Ronald & Golub, Gene H., 1984. "Imposing curvature restrictions on flexible functional forms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 295-321, December.
    7. Xingdong Feng & Nell Sedransk & Jessie Q. Xia, 2014. "Calibration using constrained smoothing with applications to mass spectrometry data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 398-408, June.
    8. Jason Abrevaya & Wei Jiang, 2005. "A Nonparametric Approach to Measuring and Testing Curvature," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 23, pages 1-19, January.
    9. Terrell, Dek, 1996. "Incorporating Monotonicity and Concavity Conditions in Flexible Functional Forms," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 179-194, March-Apr.
    10. Carroll, Raymond J. & Delaigle, Aurore & Hall, Peter, 2011. "Testing and Estimating Shape-Constrained Nonparametric Density and Regression in the Presence of Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 191-202.
    11. M. Ahkim & I. Gijbels & A. Verhasselt, 2017. "Shape testing in varying coefficient models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(2), pages 429-450, June.
    12. Graciela Boente & Daniela Rodriguez & Pablo Vena, 2020. "Robust estimators in a generalized partly linear regression model under monotony constraints," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 50-89, March.
    13. Jianhua Z. Huang & Lijian Yang, 2004. "Identification of non‐linear additive autoregressive models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 463-477, May.
    14. Shujie Ma & Peter X.-K. Song, 2015. "Varying Index Coefficient Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 341-356, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana Komarova & Javier Hidalgo, 2019. "Testing nonparametric shape restrictions," Papers 1909.01675, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    2. Ghosal, Rahul & Ghosh, Sujit & Urbanek, Jacek & Schrack, Jennifer A. & Zipunnikov, Vadim, 2023. "Shape-constrained estimation in functional regression with Bernstein polynomials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    4. Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Vouldis, Angelos T. & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2010. "Globally flexible functional forms: The neural distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 456-469, October.
    5. Millimet, Daniel L. & Tchernis, Rusty, 2008. "Estimating high-dimensional demand systems in the presence of many binding non-negativity constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 384-395, December.
    6. William Barnett & Meenakshi Pasupathy, 2003. "Regularity of the Generalized Quadratic Production Model: A Counterexample," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 135-154.
    7. Sauer, J., 2007. "Monotonicity and Curvature – A Bootstrapping Approach," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 42, March.
    8. Tsionas, Mike G. & Izzeldin, Marwan, 2018. "Smooth approximations to monotone concave functions in production analysis: An alternative to nonparametric concave least squares," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 797-807.
    9. Wang, J. & Ghosh, S.K., 2012. "Shape restricted nonparametric regression with Bernstein polynomials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 2729-2741.
    10. Hendrik Wolff & Thomas Heckelei & Ron Mittelhammer, 2010. "Imposing Curvature and Monotonicity on Flexible Functional Forms: An Efficient Regional Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 309-339, December.
    11. O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Coelli, Timothy J., 2005. "A Bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 493-523, June.
    12. Christopher Parmeter & Kai Sun & Daniel Henderson & Subal Kumbhakar, 2014. "Estimation and inference under economic restrictions," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 111-129, February.
    13. Pang Du & Christopher F. Parmeter & Jeffrey S. Racine, 2012. "Nonparametric Kernel Regression with Multiple Predictors and Multiple Shape Constraints," Department of Economics Working Papers 2012-08, McMaster University.
    14. Sauer, J.F., 2005. "“Efficiency Flooding”: Black-Box Frontiers and Policy Implications," International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 2(1), pages 17-52.
    15. Griffiths, William E. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Cruz, Agustina Tan, 2000. "Imposing regularity conditions on a system of cost and factor share equations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-21.
    16. Apostolos Serletis & Guohua Feng, 2015. "Imposing Theoretical Regularity on Flexible Functional Forms," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1-2), pages 198-227, February.
    17. Zhang, Bo & Shen, Xiaotong & Mumford, Sunni L., 2012. "Generalized degrees of freedom and adaptive model selection in linear mixed-effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 574-586.
    18. Link, Heike, 2006. "An econometric analysis of motorway renewal costs in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 19-34, January.
    19. Humberto Brea-Solis & Sergio Perelman & David Saal, 2017. "Regulatory incentives to water losses reduction: the case of England and Wales," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 259-276, June.
    20. Mark M. Pitt & Daniel L. Millimet, 1999. "Estimation of Coherent Demand Systems with Many Binding Non-Negativity Constraints," Working Papers 99-4, Brown University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:148:y:2020:i:c:s0167947320300475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.