IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v186y2024ics096007792400701x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social contagion on higher-order networks: The effect of relationship strengths

Author

Listed:
  • Fang, Fanshu
  • Ma, Jing
  • Ma, Yin-Jie
  • Boccaletti, Stefano

Abstract

We study the role and impact of interpersonal relationships on the dissemination of information, emotions, and behaviors through social higher-order networks. Namely, we introduce a novel model that explicitly accounts for strong and weak relationships on social contagion, and that integrates binary and ternary interactions among individuals. The model captures the dynamics of complex group interactions, and the differential impact that these relationship strengths have on the spread of contagion within various network structures. Our study reveals that in non-preferential structures, strong relationships significantly accelerate contagion, enhancing infection rates especially when weak relationship infection rates are low. Conversely, in preferential and mixed structures, the influence of strong relationships is more subdued, with network architecture playing a more dominant role in contagion dynamics. Our results thus offer various hints for managing social contagion. For instance, enhancing positive interactions within specific network structures, such as increasing connectivity in preferential networks or stabilizing influential nodes in non-preferential networks, can significantly promote a rapid spread of positive information and healthy behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang, Fanshu & Ma, Jing & Ma, Yin-Jie & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2024. "Social contagion on higher-order networks: The effect of relationship strengths," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s096007792400701x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792400701X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Iacopo Iacopini & Giovanni Petri & Alain Barrat & Vito Latora, 2019. "Simplicial models of social contagion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Unai Alvarez-Rodriguez & Federico Battiston & Guilherme Ferraz Arruda & Yamir Moreno & Matjaž Perc & Vito Latora, 2021. "Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 586-595, May.
    4. Nie, Yanyi & Zhong, Xiaoni & Lin, Tao & Wang, Wei, 2022. "Homophily in competing behavior spreading among the heterogeneous population with higher-order interactions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    5. Li, Zhaoqing & Deng, Zhenghong & Han, Zhen & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Barzel, Baruch & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2021. "Contagion in simplicial complexes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    7. Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nie, Yanyi & Zhong, Xiaoni & Lin, Tao & Wang, Wei, 2022. "Homophily in competing behavior spreading among the heterogeneous population with higher-order interactions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    2. Ma, Ning & Yu, Guang & Jin, Xin, 2024. "Dynamics of competing public sentiment contagion in social networks incorporating higher-order interactions during the dissemination of public opinion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    4. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    5. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    6. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Federico Malizia & Santiago Lamata-Otín & Mattia Frasca & Vito Latora & Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes, 2025. "Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    11. Barrera, Oscar & Guriev, Sergei & Henry, Emeric & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2020. "Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Sumeet Kumar & Binxuan Huang & Ramon Alfonso Villa Cox & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "An anatomical comparison of fake-news and trusted-news sharing pattern on Twitter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 109-133, June.
    13. Zazli Lily Wisker & Robert Neil McKie, 2021. "The effect of fake news on anger and negative word-of-mouth: moderating roles of religiosity and conservatism," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(2), pages 144-153, June.
    14. Roger D. Magarey & Christina M. Trexler, 2020. "Information: a missing component in understanding and mitigating social epidemics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    16. Larsen, Vegard H. & Thorsrud, Leif Anders & Zhulanova, Julia, 2021. "News-driven inflation expectations and information rigidities," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 507-520.
    17. Deena A. Isom & Hunter M. Boehme & Toniqua C. Mikell & Stephen Chicoine & Marion Renner, 2021. "Status Threat, Social Concerns, and Conservative Media: A Look at White America and the Alt-Right," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Lohse, Johannes & McDonald, Rebecca, 2021. "Absolute groupishness and the demand for information," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242454, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    20. Germano, Fabrizio & Sobbrio, Francesco, 2020. "Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s096007792400701x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.