IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v178y2024ics0960077923012006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus formation among mobile agents in networks of heterogeneous interaction venues

Author

Listed:
  • Mikaberidze, Guram
  • Nag Chowdhury, Sayantan
  • Hastings, Alan
  • D’Souza, Raissa M.

Abstract

Exploring the collective behavior of interacting entities is of great interest and importance. Rather than focusing on static and uniform connections, we examine the co-evolution of diverse mobile agents experiencing varying interactions across both space and time. Analogous to the social dynamics of intrinsically diverse individuals who navigate between and interact within various physical or digital locations, agents in our model traverse a complex network of heterogeneous environments and engage with everyone they encounter. The precise nature of agents’ internal dynamics and the various interactions that nodes induce are left unspecified and can be tailored to suit the requirements of individual applications. We derive effective dynamical equations for agent states which are instrumental in investigating thresholds of consensus, devising effective attack strategies to hinder coherence, and designing optimal network structures with inherent node variations in mind. We demonstrate that agent cohesion can be promoted by increasing agent density, introducing network heterogeneity, and intelligently designing the network structure, aligning node degrees with the corresponding interaction strengths they facilitate. Our findings are applied to two distinct scenarios: the synchronization of brain activities between interacting individuals, as observed in recent collective MRI scans, and the emergence of consensus in a cusp catastrophe model of opinion dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikaberidze, Guram & Nag Chowdhury, Sayantan & Hastings, Alan & D’Souza, Raissa M., 2024. "Consensus formation among mobile agents in networks of heterogeneous interaction venues," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0960077923012006
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923012006
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin P. O’Keeffe & Hyunsuk Hong & Steven H. Strogatz, 2017. "Oscillators that sync and swarm," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Christopher A. Bail & Lisa P. Argyle & Taylor W. Brown & John P. Bumpus & Haohan Chen & M. B. Fallin Hunzaker & Jaemin Lee & Marcus Mann & Friedolin Merhout & Alexander Volfovsky, 2018. "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(37), pages 9216-9221, September.
    3. A. Barrat & M. Weigt, 2000. "On the properties of small-world network models," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 547-560, February.
    4. Steven H. Strogatz & Daniel M. Abrams & Allan McRobie & Bruno Eckhardt & Edward Ott, 2005. "Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7064), pages 43-44, November.
    5. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weng, Tongfeng & Chen, Xiaolu & Ren, Zhuoming & Xu, Jin & Yang, Huijie, 2023. "Multiple moving agents on complex networks: From intermittent synchronization to complete synchronization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 614(C).
    2. Igor Belykh & Mateusz Bocian & Alan R. Champneys & Kevin Daley & Russell Jeter & John H. G. Macdonald & Allan McRobie, 2021. "Emergence of the London Millennium Bridge instability without synchronisation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Wang, Zhuoyang & Chen, Guo & Hill, David J. & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2016. "A power flow based model for the analysis of vulnerability in power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 105-115.
    4. Konstantinos Antoniadis & Kostas Zafiropoulos & Vasiliki Vrana, 2016. "A Method for Assessing the Performance of e-Government Twitter Accounts," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Ryan M. Hynes & Bernardo S. Buarque & Ronald B. Davies & Dieter F. Kogler, 2020. "Hops, Skip & a Jump - The Regional Uniqueness of Beer Styles," Working Papers 202013, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    6. Lenore Newman & Ann Dale, 2007. "Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 79-90, February.
    7. Yue Chen & Xiaojian Niu & Yan Zhang, 2019. "Exploring Contrarian Degree in the Trading Behavior of China's Stock Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, April.
    8. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    10. Alexander Shiroky & Andrey Kalashnikov, 2021. "Mathematical Problems of Managing the Risks of Complex Systems under Targeted Attacks with Known Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Anand, Kartik & Gai, Prasanna & Marsili, Matteo, 2012. "Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1088-1100.
    12. Yao, Jialing & Sun, Bingbin & Xi, lifeng, 2019. "Fractality of evolving self-similar networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 211-216.
    13. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    14. Britta Hoyer & Kris De Jaegher, 2023. "Network disruption and the common-enemy effect," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 117-155, March.
    15. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    16. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2019. "Core and critical cities of global region airport networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 724-733.
    17. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    18. Diana Tampu & Carmen Costea, 2013. "Why society is a complex problem? A review of Philip Ball's book: Meeting Twentyfirst Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 2(1), pages 80-89, March.
    19. Elosegui, Pedro & Forte, Federico D. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2022. "Network structure and fragmentation of the Argentinean interbank markets," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    20. Liu, Run-Ran & Chu, Changchang & Meng, Fanyuan, 2023. "Higher-order interdependent percolation on hypergraphs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0960077923012006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.