IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v172y2023ics0960077923004046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asynchronous best-response dynamics of networked anti-coordination game with payoff incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Yuying
  • Xia, Chengyi

Abstract

How to understand and model the spatial collective decision-making behaviors in the evolutionary game context is an open problem, which attracts burgeoning interdisciplinary studies in the fields of graph theory and evolutionary game theory. This is a newly emerging research topic with wide applications under many real engineering, social and natural nonlinear systems. In this paper, we investigate the asynchronous best-response dynamics of anti-coordinating agents by developing two types of payoff incentive mechanisms, i.e., reward and punishment. We start from characterizing the equilibria of the best-response dynamics based on various types of graph structures. By offering relevant payoff incentives to targeted nodes, we further explore the global outcomes of strategy evolution. Current results suggest that both the reward and punishment can cause the strategy switches of targeted nodes, thus to induce a cascading effect of the evolutionary dynamics in the spatial gaming systems. Given the unlimited and limited budget cases for the payoff incentives, we calculate the optimal solutions for the added incentives, which facilitates the prediction on how the system dynamics be influenced by the proposed incentive mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Yuying & Xia, Chengyi, 2023. "Asynchronous best-response dynamics of networked anti-coordination game with payoff incentives," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:172:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923004046
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923004046
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duh, Maja & Gosak, Marko & Perc, Matjaž, 2021. "Public goods games on random hyperbolic graphs with mixing," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. James Andreoni & William Harbaugh & Lise Vesterlund, 2003. "The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 893-902, June.
    3. Hu, Liwen & He, Nanrong & Weng, Qifeng & Chen, Xiaojie & Perc, Matjaž, 2020. "Rewarding endowments lead to a win-win in the evolution of public cooperation and the accumulation of common resources," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Erez Lieberman & Christoph Hauert & Martin A. Nowak, 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics on graphs," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7023), pages 312-316, January.
    5. Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2002. "Altruistic punishment in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 137-140, January.
    6. Pouria Ramazi & Jop Hessel & Ming Cao, 2015. "How Feeling Betrayed Affects Cooperation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Song, Shenpeng & Feng, Yuhao & Xu, Wenzhe & Li, Hui-Jia & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on signed networks based on structural balance theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Hoffmann, Eric J. & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2019. "Global games with strategic complements and substitutes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 72-93.
    9. Yang, Kai & Huang, Changwei & Dai, Qionglin & Yang, Junzhong, 2018. "The effects of attribute persistence on cooperation in evolutionary games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 23-28.
    10. Bayani, Atiyeh & Jafari, Sajad & Azarnoush, Hamed & Nazarimehr, Fahimeh & Boccaletti, Stefano & Perc, Matjaž, 2023. "Explosive synchronization dependence on initial conditions: The minimal Kuramoto model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Jörg Gross & Carsten K. W. Dreu, 2019. "The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Meiling & Li, Xuezhu & Zhao, Dawei & Xia, Chengyi, 2023. "Evolutionary dynamics with the second-order reputation in the networked N-player trust game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
    2. Zhao, Xiaowei & Xia, Haoxiang, 2023. "Information accuracy of migration and imitation influences the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Wei & Peng Xu & Shuiting Du & Guanghui Yan & Huayan Pei, 2021. "Reputational preference-based payoff punishment promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemmas," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(10), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Feng, Sinan & Liu, Xuesong & Dong, Yida, 2022. "Limited punishment pool may promote cooperation in the public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    3. Elena Cettolin & Arno Riedl, 2011. "Partial Coercion, Conditional Cooperation, and Self-Commitment in Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 3556, CESifo.
    4. Andrej Angelovski & Arianna Galliera & Werner Güth, 2019. "Partial Versus General Compulsory Solidarity: an Experimental Analysis," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 249-279, December.
    5. Gaechter, S. & Mengel, F. & Tsakas, E. & Vostroknutov, A., 2013. "Growth and inequality in public good games," Research Memorandum 070, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    6. Luo-Luo Jiang & Matjaž Perc & Attila Szolnoki, 2013. "If Cooperation Is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    7. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2021. "Punishing defectors and rewarding cooperators: Do people discriminate between genders?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 19-32, September.
    8. Chugunova, Marina & Luhan, Wolfgang J. & Nicklisch, Andreas, 2020. "When to leave carrots for sticks: On the evolution of sanctioning institutions in open communities," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Fudenberg, Drew & Pathak, Parag A., 2010. "Unobserved punishment supports cooperation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1-2), pages 78-86, February.
    10. Casari, Marco & Luini, Luigi, 2009. "Cooperation under alternative punishment institutions: An experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 273-282, August.
    11. Dan Ariely & Nina Mazar, 2006. "Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications," Working Papers 06-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    12. Charness, Gary & Cobo-Reyes, Ramón & Jiménez, Natalia, 2008. "An investment game with third-party intervention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 18-28, October.
    13. Isaac Mbiti & Danila Serra, 2022. "Health workers’ behavior, patient reporting and reputational concerns: lab-in-the-field experimental evidence from Kenya," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 514-556, April.
    14. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Dai, Wenhui, 2024. "Evolution of cooperation under corrupt institutions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Wang, Xianjia & Ding, Rui & Zhao, Jinhua & Gu, Cuiling, 2022. "The rise and fall of cooperation in populations with multiple groups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    18. Jie Chen, 2022. "Carrots and sticks: new evidence in public goods games with heterogeneous groups," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(4), pages 1139-1169, October.
    19. Charlotte Klempt & Kerstin Pull, 2018. "The hidden costs of control revisited: Should a sanctioning policy be announced in advance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 158-170, March.
    20. Yu, Tongkui & Chen, Shu-Heng & Li, Honggang, 2011. "Social Norm, Costly Punishment and the Evolution to Cooperation," MPRA Paper 28814, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:172:y:2023:i:c:s0960077923004046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.