IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v144y2021ics0960077921000187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black swans, extreme risks, and the e-pile model of self-organized criticality

Author

Listed:
  • Milovanov, Alexander V.
  • Rasmussen, Jens Juul
  • Groslambert, Bertrand

Abstract

A new model of self-organized criticality (SOC) is described which differs from ordinary sand-pile SOC models in that it uses electrically charged particles of different kinds to propagate activities and to generate the critical state. The model, arguably called the e-pile model (as an alternative to sand-pile, with “e-” standing for “electric charge”), is motivated by the problem of dielectric relaxation in self-asembling random lattices with disorder under the action of electrostatic forces, but in principle it may be applied to different SOC processes with the random injection scheme and charitable lattice-redistribution rule. We show that the critical state is that of self-evolving random percolation clusters at the edge of percolation and is also different from known “self-organized” versions of the percolation problem based on the directed percolation. A set of critical exponents is obtained based on the random walks, using the Kramers-Kronig relation and the formalism of frequency-dependent complex conductivity. The relaxation of a supercritical system to SOC is shown to obey the Mittag-Leffler pattern and fractional relaxation equation, with a broad distribution of durations of relaxation events. A peculiar feature of the e-pile system is that it is characterized by an intrinsic bias disregarding a vast majority of incipient relaxation events (by killing them “in their egg”), while it also favors other events that may, then, grow into extremely large sizes. We use this observation to explain the phenomenon of the “black swan,” by which one means a family of rare, large events, whose sudden occurrence is very difficult to predict, despite the important impact this type of event may have over the entire system. The event-size distribution of the black swans is found to be a power law, with the drop-off exponent being sensitive to the complexity features of the underlying percolation clusters. On the basis of this observation, we show that the black swans are less probable in more complex environments, and we use this argument to explain why driven, dissipative systems would develop complex structures as a result of dynamical evolution. The e-pile model reveals the upper critical dimension dc=6 for which a crossover to mean-field SOC is found. In six and higher dimensions, the probability density to observe a black swan of a given size behaves as the inverse cube of the size. Below dc the decay is always slower than the inverse-cube and is flatter at lower dimensions. The implications of the mean-field law in country risk assessment, business, and finance are discussed. Finally, we show that the occurrence of the power-law tails is limited to the rate of the driving, and that for too high a rate a different branch of extreme events may result, with the defining features enabling to associate this branch with the phenomenon of dragon kings.

Suggested Citation

  • Milovanov, Alexander V. & Rasmussen, Jens Juul & Groslambert, Bertrand, 2021. "Black swans, extreme risks, and the e-pile model of self-organized criticality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:144:y:2021:i:c:s0960077921000187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077921000187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Didier SORNETTE, 2009. "Dragon-Kings, Black Swans and the Prediction of Crises," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 09-36, Swiss Finance Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manivelan, S.V. & Sabarathinam, S. & Thamilmaran, K. & Manimehan, I., 2024. "Dynamical instabilities cause extreme events in a theoretical Brusselator model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darrell Jiajie Tay & Chung-I Chou & Sai-Ping Li & Shang You Tee & Siew Ann Cheong, 2016. "Bubbles Are Departures from Equilibrium Housing Markets: Evidence from Singapore and Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Jiong Liu & M. Dashti Moghaddam & R. A. Serota, 2023. "Are there Dragon Kings in the Stock Market?," Papers 2307.03693, arXiv.org.
    3. M. Wili'nski & A. Sienkiewicz & T. Gubiec & R. Kutner & Z. R. Struzik, 2013. "Structural and topological phase transitions on the German Stock Exchange," Papers 1301.2530, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2013.
    4. Jiong Liu & R. A. Serota, 2023. "Rethinking Generalized Beta family of distributions," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Wosnitza, Jan Henrik & Leker, Jens, 2014. "Can log-periodic power law structures arise from random fluctuations?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 228-250.
    6. Wouter Vermeer & Otto Koppius & Peter Vervest, 2018. "The Radiation-Transmission-Reception (RTR) model of propagation: Implications for the effectiveness of network interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Neil Johnson & Guannan Zhao & Eric Hunsader & Jing Meng & Amith Ravindar & Spencer Carran & Brian Tivnan, 2012. "Financial black swans driven by ultrafast machine ecology," Papers 1202.1448, arXiv.org.
    8. V. Filimonov & G. Demos & D. Sornette, 2017. "Modified profile likelihood inference and interval forecast of the burst of financial bubbles," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1167-1186, August.
    9. J. Lorenz & S. Battiston & F. Schweitzer, 2009. "Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 441-460, October.
    10. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    11. A. Sienkiewicz & T. Gubiec & R. Kutner & Z. R. Struzik, 2013. "Dynamic structural and topological phase transitions on the Warsaw Stock Exchange: A phenomenological approach," Papers 1301.6506, arXiv.org.
    12. F. A. Nava & V. H. Márquez-Ramírez & F. R. Zúñiga & C. Lomnitz, 2017. "Gutenberg–Richter b-value determination and large-magnitudes sampling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Petr Geraskin & Dean Fantazzini, 2013. "Everything you always wanted to know about log-periodic power laws for bubble modeling but were afraid to ask," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 366-391, May.
    14. Santos, Moises S. & Szezech, José D. & Batista, Antonio M. & Iarosz, Kelly C. & Caldas, Iberê L. & Viana, Ricardo L., 2019. "Dragon-kings death in nonlinear wave interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    15. Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Xie, Wen-Jie & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2014. "Testing the weak-form efficiency of the WTI crude oil futures market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 235-244.
    16. Gianluca Pescaroli & David Alexander, 2018. "Understanding Compound, Interconnected, Interacting, and Cascading Risks: A Holistic Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2245-2257, November.
    17. Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Charles Djordjevic, 2020. "Complexity, Power Laws and a Humean Argument in Risk Management: The Fundamental Inadequacy of Probability Theory as a Foundation for Modeling Complex Risk in Banking," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 155-182, December.
    18. Domino, Krzysztof, 2020. "Multivariate cumulants in outlier detection for financial data analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    19. Marco Bianchetti & Davide Galli & Camilla Ricci & Angelo Salvatori & Marco Scaringi, 2016. "Brexit or Bremain ? Evidence from bubble analysis," Papers 1606.06829, arXiv.org.
    20. Rebecca Westphal & Didier Sornette, 2019. "Market Impact and Performance of Arbitrageurs of Financial Bubbles in An Agent-Based Model," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 19-29, Swiss Finance Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:144:y:2021:i:c:s0960077921000187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.