IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v143y2021ics0960077920309139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synchronization in human decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yi-Fang
  • Andersen, Jørgen Vitting
  • Frolov, Maxime
  • de Peretti, Philippe

Abstract

Just as soldiers crossing a bridge in sync can produce a catastrophic structural failure, we use experiment, theory, and simulation to show how synchronization in human decision-making can lead to extreme outcomes. Individual decision-making and risk-taking are well known to be gender dependent. However, much less is known about the impact of gender on the generation of collective risk through aggregate decision-making, where the decision of one individual can affect the decision-making of other individuals, leading eventually to synchronization of behavior. To study the formation of collective risk as generated by synchronization in human decision-making, we have devised a series of experiments that can be analyzed and understood within a game-theoretical framework. Experiments involve groups of either men or women, and each individual decides to buy or sell a financial asset using information that contains previous price trends and economic news. Risk can be generated collectively through coordination in the aggregate decision-making, which leads to a price formation far from the fundamental value of the asset. Here we show that collective risk can be generated in groups of either gender, but also that the way it is generated happens through a different type of individual risk-taking for groups composed of men and groups composed of women.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yi-Fang & Andersen, Jørgen Vitting & Frolov, Maxime & de Peretti, Philippe, 2021. "Synchronization in human decision-making," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:143:y:2021:i:c:s0960077920309139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077920309139
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magda Roszczynska-Kurasinska & Andrzej Nowak & Daniel Kamieniarz & Sorin Solomon & Jørgen Vitting Andersen, 2012. "Short and Long Term Investor Synchronization Caused by Decoupling," Post-Print hal-00853991, HAL.
    2. Lex Borghans & Bart H. H. Golsteyn & James J. Heckman & Huub Meijers, 2009. "Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 649-658, 04-05.
    3. George A. Akerlof, 2009. "How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1175-1175.
    4. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    5. Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, 2002. "Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1644-1655, December.
    6. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Challet, D. & Zhang, Y.-C., 1997. "Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 407-418.
    8. Powell, Melanie & Ansic, David, 1997. "Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 605-628, November.
    9. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:30-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Dwyer, Peggy D. & Gilkeson, James H. & List, John A., 2002. "Gender differences in revealed risk taking: evidence from mutual fund investors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 151-158, July.
    11. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Andrzej Nowak, 2013. "An Introduction to Socio-Finance," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-41944-7, December.
    12. Challet, Damien & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 1998. "On the minority game: Analytical and numerical studies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 514-532.
    13. Lex Borghans & Bart H.H. Golsteyn & James J. Heckman & Huub Meijers, 2009. "Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity," Working Papers 200903, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    14. Magda Roszczynska-Kurasinska & Andrzej Nowak & Daniel Kamieniarz & Sorin Solomon & Jørgen Vitting Andersen, 2012. "Short and Long Term Investor Synchronization Caused by Decoupling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    16. Johnson, Neil F & Hart, Michael & Hui, P.M, 1999. "Crowd effects and volatility in markets with competing agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 1-8.
    17. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri, 2012. "Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 50-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Savona & Maxence Soumare & Jørgen Vitting Andersen, 2015. "Financial Symmetry and Moods in the Market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Yi-Fang Liu & Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Maxime Frolov & Philippe de Peretti, 2016. "Synchronization in human decision making," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16035, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Roberto Savona & Maxence Soumare & Jørgen Vitting Andersen, 2014. "Financial Symmetry and Moods in the Market," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00983008, HAL.
    4. Yi-Fang Liu & Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Maxime Frolov & Philippe de Peretti, 2016. "Synchronization in human decision making," Post-Print halshs-01317407, HAL.
    5. Yi-Fang Liu & Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Maxime Frolov & Philippe de Peretti, 2016. "Synchronization in human decision making," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01317407, HAL.
    6. Andersen, Jørgen Vitting & de Peretti, Philippe, 2021. "Heuristics in experiments with infinitely large strategy spaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 612-620.
    7. Yi-Fang Liu & Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Philippe de Peretti, 2016. "Onset of financial instability studied via agent-based models," Post-Print hal-01397400, HAL.
    8. Milner, Mattie & Rice, Stephen & Rice, Connor, 2019. "Support for environmentally-friendly airports influenced by political affiliation and social identity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Mani, Subha & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh, 2016. "Eliciting Risk Preferences: Firefighting in the Field," IZA Discussion Papers 9765, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Julie A. Nelson, 2015. "Are Women Really More Risk-Averse Than Men? A Re-Analysis Of The Literature Using Expanded Methods," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 566-585, July.
    11. Aggarwal, Divya & Damodaran, Uday, 2020. "Ambiguity attitudes and myopic loss aversion: Experimental evidence using carnival games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    12. David Blake & Edmund Cannon & Douglas Wright, 2021. "Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 27-57, August.
    13. Schmidt, Ulrich & Friedl, Andreas & Eichenseer, Michael & Lima de Miranda, Katharina, 2021. "Social comparison and gender differences in financial risk taking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 58-72.
    14. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Mani, Subha & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh, 2016. "Eliciting Risk Preferences: Firefighting in the Field," IZA Discussion Papers 9765, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Bertrand, Marianne, 2011. "New Perspectives on Gender," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 17, pages 1543-1590, Elsevier.
    16. Becchetti, Leonardo & Degli Antoni, Giacomo & Ottone, Stefania & Solferino, Nazaria, 2013. "Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 96-111.
    17. Czibor, Eszter & Claussen, Jörg & van Praag, Mirjam, 2019. "Women in a men’s world: Risk taking in an online card game community," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 62-89.
    18. Yating Chuang & John Chung-En Liu, 2020. "Who wears a mask? Gender differences in risk behaviors in the COVID-19 early days in Taiwan," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2619-2627.
    19. James Alm & Antoine Malézieux, 2021. "40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 699-750, September.
    20. repec:zbw:rwirep:0488 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Oleg Badunenko & Nataliya Barasinska & Dorothea Schäfer, 2009. "Risk Attitudes and Investment Decisions across European Countries: Are Women More Conservative Investors than Men?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 224, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:143:y:2021:i:c:s0960077920309139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.