IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v65y2022i4p427-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merit versus maleness: How strategic positioning can mitigate external gender bias

Author

Listed:
  • Mui, Rachel
  • Parker, Owen
  • Titus, Varkey

Abstract

Despite the proactive efforts of many firms to combat gender bias within their organizations, societal prejudices still disadvantage women leaders and the firms who employ them. This external gender bias shapes outside stakeholder evaluations of women leaders’ efforts in various ways, and firms need strategies to cope with this external gender bias. We examine the conditions that might alleviate this burden of external bias and what women leaders and top executives can do to leverage these conditions—from a strategic positioning perspective—that will effectively allow female leaders to differentiate their work. To do this, we synthesize and build upon evidence that the external gender bias against women leaders diminishes when they lead in areas that are unconventional rather than mainstream. We then propose a two-step process based on (1) identifying the likely threat of external gender bias, which is stronger in some industry contexts than others, and (2) leveraging unconventionality to circumvent male prototypical comparisons, thereby reducing the hazards of external gender bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Mui, Rachel & Parker, Owen & Titus, Varkey, 2022. "Merit versus maleness: How strategic positioning can mitigate external gender bias," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 427-436.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:4:p:427-436
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681321000963
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peggy M. Lee & Erika Hayes James, 2007. "She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 227-241, March.
    2. Fitzsimmons, Stacey R., 2012. "Women on boards of directors: Why skirts in seats aren’t enough," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 557-566.
    3. Owen Parker & Rachel Mui & Varkey Titus, 2020. "Unwelcome voices: The gender bias‐mitigating potential of unconventionality," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 738-757, April.
    4. Cristian L. Dezsö & David Gaddis Ross, 2012. "Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1072-1089, September.
    5. Tate, Geoffrey & Yang, Liu, 2015. "Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 77-97.
    6. Getchell, Kristen M. & Beitelspacher, Lauren Skinner, 2020. "Better marketing for female marketers: Gendered language in the Forbes CMO list," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 607-617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sullivan, Diane M. & Bendell, Bari L., 2023. "Help! Lonely at work: Managerial interventions to combat employee loneliness," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 655-666.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Lu & Gonzalez, Angelica & Sila, Vathunyoo, 2021. "Does cooperation among women enhance or impede firm performance?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    2. Nguyen, Tuan & Nguyen, An & Nguyen, Mau & Truong, Thuyen, 2021. "Is national governance quality a key moderator of the boardroom gender diversity–firm performance relationship? International evidence from a multi-hierarchical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 370-390.
    3. Luca Flabbi & Mario Macis & Andrea Moro & Fabiano Schivardi, 2019. "Do Female Executives Make a Difference? The Impact of Female Leadership on Gender Gaps and Firm Performance," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(622), pages 2390-2423.
    4. Lee, Jangwook & Chung, Jiyoon, 2022. "Women in top management teams and their impact on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Elisa Ughetto & Mariacristina Rossi & David Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2020. "Female entrepreneurship in the digital era," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 305-312, August.
    6. Tanaka, Takanori, 2019. "Gender diversity on Japanese corporate boards," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-31.
    7. Francesco Devicienti & Elena Grinza & Alessandro Manello & Davide Vannoni, 2016. "Which Are the Benefits of Having more Female Leaders? Evidence from the Use of Part-Time Work in Italy," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 489, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    8. Lena Göbel & Steffen Burkert, 2023. "Benevolent Leadership: Unveiling the Impact of Supervisor Gender on HR Practices and Employee Commitment," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Minsu Ko & Cynthia Yin, 2024. "Socially Responsible Investment and Gender Equality in the United States Census," Working Papers 24-44, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    10. Jie Huang & Marjo-Riitta Diehl & Sandra Paterlini, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Elites on Women on Supervisory Boards: Female Directors’ Inclusion in Germany," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 347-364, August.
    11. Letian Zhang, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Gender Diversity and Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 439-457, March.
    12. Isabelle Solal & Kaisa Snellman, 2019. "Women Don’t Mean Business? Gender Penalty in Board Composition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1270-1288, November.
    13. Sanjukta Brahma & Chioma Nwafor & Agyenim Boateng, 2021. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5704-5719, October.
    14. Rovelli, Paola, 2020. ""I am stuck in meetings": Understanding the relation of CEO time management with TMT size and gender diversity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 777-790.
    15. Owen Parker & Rachel Mui & Varkey Titus, 2020. "Unwelcome voices: The gender bias‐mitigating potential of unconventionality," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 738-757, April.
    16. Adeel Mustafa & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Awais & Shahab Aziz, 2020. "Board-Gender Diversity, Family Ownership, and Dividend Announcement: Evidence from Asian Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Kristina Reineke & Holger Steinmetz & Rodrigo Isidor & Rüdiger Kabst, 2020. "Women on Top Management Teams and Firm Performance in German Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Recruiting Source," Working Papers Dissertations 60, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    18. Syed Shafqat Mukarram & Abubakr Saeed & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, 2018. "Women on Indian boards and market performance: a role-congruity theory perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 4-36, February.
    19. Víctor Alonso Baldrich Mora, 2019. "Mujeres en juntas directivas en Colombia y su efecto sobre el desempeno financiero de las empresas," Documentos CEDE 17140, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    20. Mehta, Nikhil & Mehta, Anju & Hassan, Yusuf & Buttner, Holly & RoyChowdhury, Sanchita, 2021. "Choices in CDO appointment and firm performance: Moving towards a Stakeholder-based approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 233-251.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:4:p:427-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.