IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v55y2023i1s0890838921000913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring effectiveness of entity actions to eliminate modern slavery risk – Early Australian evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Christ, Katherine L.
  • Burritt, Roger L.

Abstract

The need for entities to eliminate the unethical and illegal practice of modern slavery in their operations and supply chains has led different jurisdictions to require large entities to report on how they assess the effectiveness of actions taken. In Australia, to build awareness of practices for internal and external stakeholders, the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) mandates annual reporting in modern slavery statements and provides guidance as to how effectiveness of actions might be reported on. Based on theories/frameworks/models from literature addressing organisational effectiveness, an inductive analysis is conducted on the first 255 modern slavery statements published on the Australian Modern Slavery Register. Results indicate great diversity in approaches to reporting on effectiveness of actions, ranging from a total lack of reporting, through basic compliance, to going beyond compliance. The observations are used to develop a comprehensive framework for assessment of organisational effectiveness and an assessment of the extent to which current effectiveness theories/frameworks/models can guide future developments. The paper suggests adoption of the proposed framework can lead entities to improved transparency and validation of the effectiveness of their actions, as an important first step towards elimination of modern slavery in their supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Christ, Katherine L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2023. "Exploring effectiveness of entity actions to eliminate modern slavery risk – Early Australian evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:55:y:2023:i:1:s0890838921000913
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.101065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838921000913
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phillip H. Kim & Karl Wennberg & Grégoire Croidieu, 2016. "Untapped Riches of Meso-Level Applications in Multilevel Entrepreneurship Mechanisms," Post-Print hal-02276717, HAL.
    2. Katherine Leanne Christ & Kathyayini Kathy Rao & Roger Leonard Burritt, 2019. "Accounting for modern slavery: an analysis of Australian listed company disclosures," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 836-865, April.
    3. Otley, D. T. & Berry, A. J., 1980. "Control, organisation and accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 231-244, April.
    4. Petros Vourvachis & Thérèse Woodward, 2015. "Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 166-195, September.
    5. Kwee Keong Choong & Sardar M. Islam, 2020. "A new approach to performance measurement using standards: a case of translating strategy to operations," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 137-170, December.
    6. Zoe J. Radnor & David Barnes, 2007. "Historical analysis of performance measurement and management in operations management," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(5/6), pages 384-396, June.
    7. Michael Rogerson & Andrew Crane & Vivek Soundararajan & Johanne Grosvold & Charles H. Cho, 2020. "Organisational responses to mandatory modern slavery disclosure legislation: a failure of experimentalist governance?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1505-1534, July.
    8. Katherine Leanne Christ & Roger Leonard Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Accounting for work conditions from modern slavery to decent work," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1481-1504, July.
    9. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2019-4297 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Deegan, Craig & Haque, Shamima, 2021. "Corporate human rights performance and moral power: A study of retail MNCs’ supply chains in Bangladesh," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-04-2013-0027 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Christ, Katherine L & V Helliar, Christine, 2021. "Blockchain technology and modern slavery: Reducing deceptive recruitment in migrant worker populations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 112-120.
    13. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-05-2020-4587 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Zoe J. Radnor & David Barnes, 2007. "Historical analysis of performance measurement and management in operations management," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(5/6), pages 384-396, June.
    15. Javed Siddiqui & Kenneth McPhail & Sharmin Shabnam Rahman, 2020. "Private governance responsibilisation in global supply chains: the case of Rana Plaza," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1569-1594, July.
    16. Petros Vourvachis & Thérèse Woodward, 2015. "Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 166-195, September.
    17. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579510086812 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Schaltegger, Stefan & Burritt, Roger L., 2010. "Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 375-384, October.
    19. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-11-2018-3745 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-05-2019-3993 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Kim S. Cameron, 1986. "Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 539-553, May.
    22. Gray, Rob, 2002. "The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 687-708, October.
    23. Phillip H. Kim & Karl Wennberg & Grégoire Croidieu, 2016. "Untapped Riches of Meso-Level Applications in Multilevel Entrepreneurship Mechanisms," Post-Print hal-02312380, HAL.
    24. Deegan, Craig & Blomquist, Christopher, 2006. "Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 343-372.
    25. Rob Gray & Reza Kouhy & Simon Lavers, 1995. "Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 78-101, May.
    26. Jan Bebbington & Henrik Österblom & Beatrice Crona & Jean-Baptiste Jouffray & Carlos Larrinaga & Shona Russell & Bert Scholtens, 2019. "Accounting and accountability in the Anthropocene," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 152-177, November.
    27. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-11-2017-3242 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    2. Boudreaux, Christopher, 2019. "Do private enterprises outperform state enterprises in an emerging market? The importance of institutional context in entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 93039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Tantawy Moussa & Amir Allam & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2022. "Global modern slavery and sustainable development goals: Does institutional environment quality matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2230-2244, July.
    4. Christopher Boudreaux, 2019. "When does privatization spur entrepreneurial performance? The moderating effect of institutional quality in an emerging market," Papers 1901.03356, arXiv.org.
    5. Daniel L. Bennett, 2021. "Local economic freedom and creative destruction in America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 333-353, January.
    6. Gabriela Gutierrez-Huerter O & Stefan Gold & Alexander Trautrims, 2023. "Change in Rhetoric but not in Action? Framing of the Ethical Issue of Modern Slavery in a UK Sector at High Risk of Labor Exploitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 35-58, January.
    7. Yang Liu & Weiqi Dai & Mingqing Liao & Jiang Wei, 2021. "Social Status and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Privately Owned Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 651-672, April.
    8. Boudreaux, Christopher & Caudill, Steven, 2019. "Entrepreneurship, Institutions, and Economic Growth: Does the Level of Development Matter?," MPRA Paper 94244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Lucas, David & Boudreaux, Christopher, 2018. "Federal Regulation, Job Creation, and the Moderating Effect of State Economic Freedom," MPRA Paper 92593, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. David B. Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Rosa Caiazza & Farzana Chowdhury & Matthias Menter, 2023. "Entrepreneurial growth, value creation and new technologies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1535-1551, October.
    11. Fan, Hanlu & Tang, Qingliang & Pan, Lipeng, 2021. "An international study of carbon information asymmetry and independent carbon assurance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    12. Fredström, Ashkan & Peltonen, Juhana & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "A country-level institutional perspective on entrepreneurship productivity: The effects of informal economy and regulation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    13. Liu, Yipeng, 2020. "The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Fei Qin & Tomasz Mickiewicz & Saul Estrin, 2022. "Homophily and peer influence in early-stage new venture informal investment," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 93-116, June.
    15. Lueg, Rainer & Radlach, Ronny, 2016. "Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-171.
    16. María J. Angulo-Guerrero & Elena Bárcena-Martín & Samuel Medina-Claros & Salvador Pérez-Moreno, 2024. "Labor market regulation and gendered entrepreneurship: a cross-national perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 687-706, February.
    17. Khaled Saleh Al Omoush & Raed M. Al-Qirem & Zaid M. Al Hawatmah, 2018. "The degree of e-business entrepreneurship and long-term sustainability: an institutional perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 29-56, February.
    18. McAdam, Maura & Crowley, Caren & Harrison, Richard T., 2019. "“To boldly go where no [man] has gone before” - Institutional voids and the development of women's digital entrepreneurship11The title is taken from the original titles voice-over for the TV series St," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 912-922.
    19. Sunny Li Sun & Weilei (Stone) Shi & David Ahlstrom & Li (Rachel) Tian, 2020. "Understanding institutions and entrepreneurship: The microfoundations lens and emerging economies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 957-979, December.
    20. Sorgner, Alina & Wyrwich, Michael, 2022. "Calling Baumol: What telephones can tell us about the allocation of entrepreneurial talent in the face of radical institutional changes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(5).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:55:y:2023:i:1:s0890838921000913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.