IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v18y2010i3p171-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is marketing academia losing its way? – A commentary from a German perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kleinaltenkamp, Michael

Abstract

With respect to the question raised whether marketing academia is losing its way, the author provides answers from a German perspective. It is argued that the assessment differs whether one looks from a business-to-business (B2B) or a business-to-consumer (B2C) marketing point of view. Contrary to its practical relevance B2C marketing is dominating in academia. Thus, a huge part of the current marketing research focuses on topics which have no or only a restricted relevance for greater areas in practice with the effect that many of the problems mentioned by Reibstein, Day and Wind are also relevant in Europe. But in contrast to their statement with regard to the U.S., the domain of academic marketing in Europe and especially in Germany has been steadily increasing. And due to the fact that the academic systems in Europe and especially in Germany have just recently shifted more or less towards the usages that are common in the US, the implementation problems are more or less the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Kleinaltenkamp, Michael, 2010. "Is marketing academia losing its way? – A commentary from a German perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 171-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:18:y:2010:i:3:p:171-173
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144135821000042X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoo, Boonghee, 2009. "Developing an overall ranking of 79 marketing journals: An introduction of PRINQUAL to marketing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 160-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Storbacka, Kaj, 2014. "Does publish or perish lead to stylish rubbish?," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(1), pages 289-295.
    2. Karpen, Ingo & Plewa, Carolin, 2020. "From Muso to Academic and Back: A Time and Person-Based Acknowledgement of Michael Kleinaltenkamp," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(2-3), pages 75-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongchao Ma & Ying Teng & Zhongzhun Deng & Li Liu & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2105-2143, April.
    2. Jiang, Ling (Alice) & Zhu, Nibing & Yang, Zhilin & Xu, Shen & Jun, Minjoon, 2018. "The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 618-630.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:18:y:2010:i:3:p:171-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.