IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v88y2011i4p1181-1186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method for evaluating the efficiency of PEM fuel cell engine

Author

Listed:
  • Hou, Yongping
  • Wang, Bowen
  • Yang, Zhihua

Abstract

Efficiency is an important factor to reflect the performance of fuel cell engine (FCE). Evaluating efficiency should consider efficiency properties and common work conditions of FCE. In this paper, output power of FCE on real work conditions is analyzed according to driving cycles, and four efficiency evaluation points are obtained, as well as their weighted values. Then, a scoring function is used to convert the efficiency values of four evaluation points into scores. Multiplying scores by their weighted values and adding them together, we can get overall scores of efficiency properties. This method can evaluate the efficiency performance of FCE reasonably and objectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Hou, Yongping & Wang, Bowen & Yang, Zhihua, 2011. "A method for evaluating the efficiency of PEM fuel cell engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1181-1186, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:4:p:1181-1186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(10)00442-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Ching-Hsue & Yang, Kuo-Lung & Hwang, Chia-Lung, 1999. "Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 423-435, July.
    2. Hou, Yongping & Zhuang, Mingxi & Wan, Gang, 2007. "The analysis for the efficiency properties of the fuel cell engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1175-1186.
    3. Cheng, Ching-Hsue & Lin, Yin, 2002. "Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 174-186, October.
    4. Kazim, Ayoub, 2002. "A novel approach on the determination of the minimal operating efficiency of a PEM fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 479-488.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Sasmito, Agus P. & Shamim, Tariq, 2017. "Performance evaluation of a PEM fuel cell stack with variable inlet flows under simulated driving cycle conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 751-764.
    2. Authayanun, Suthida & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Comparison of high-temperature and low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems with glycerol reforming process for stationary applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 192-201.
    3. Chen, Huicui & Pei, Pucheng & Song, Mancun, 2015. "Lifetime prediction and the economic lifetime of Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 154-163.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D'Urso, Pierpaolo & Giordani, Paolo, 2003. "A possibilistic approach to latent structure analysis for symmetric fuzzy data," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp03014, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    2. Debendra Kumar Mahalik, 2014. "Does Decision Changes—A Case Discussion on e-Governance Outsourcing: A Fuzzy Analysis Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4_suppl), pages 39-48, December.
    3. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    4. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Lung-Hsin Lin & Kung-Jeng Wang, 2022. "Talent Retention of New Generations for Sustainable Employment Relationships in Work 4.0 Era—Assessment by Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    7. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Shin-Liang Chan & Wann-Ming Wey & Pin-Huai Chang, 2014. "Establishing Disaster Resilience Indicators for Tan-sui River Basin in Taiwan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 387-418, January.
    9. Shakhawat Chowdhury & Muhammad Al-Zahrani, 2014. "Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of treated wastewater reuse for agriculture," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 521-538, June.
    10. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša, 2021. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Ismail, M.S. & Ingham, D.B. & Ma, L. & Pourkashanian, M., 2013. "The contact resistance between gas diffusion layers and bipolar plates as they are assembled in proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-45.
    12. Seng Boon Lim & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-31, August.
    13. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Zhou, Xiaojun & Lee, Jay, 2012. "Dynamic maintenance decision-making for series–parallel manufacturing system based on MAM–MTW methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 231-240.
    14. Salemme, Lucia & Menna, Laura & Simeone, Marino, 2013. "Calculation of the energy efficiency of fuel processor – PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell systems from fuel elementar composition and heating value," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 368-374.
    15. Zeng, Tao & Zhang, Caizhi & Zhang, Yanyi & Deng, Chenghao & Hao, Dong & Zhu, Zhongwen & Ran, Hongxu & Cao, Dongpu, 2021. "Optimization-oriented adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy based on short-term demand power prediction for fuel cell hybrid vehicle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    17. Bernetti, Iacopo & Ciampi, Christian & Fagarazzi, Claudio & Sacchelli, Sandro, 2011. "The evaluation of forest crop damages due to climate change. An application of Dempster-Shafer method," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 285-297, August.
    18. Alejandro Clemente & Ramon Costa-Castelló, 2020. "Redox Flow Batteries: A Literature Review Oriented to Automatic Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Gatzert, Nadine & Vogl, Nikolai, 2016. "Evaluating investments in renewable energy under policy risks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 238-252.
    20. Wu, Kuo-Jui & Liao, Ching-Jong & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2015. "Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 147-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:4:p:1181-1186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.