IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipcs0306261924018816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilient market bidding strategy for Mobile energy storage system considering transfer uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Kaijie
  • Ma, Yuncong
  • Wei, Fanrong
  • Lin, Xiangning
  • Li, Zhengtian
  • Dawoud, Samir Mohammed

Abstract

The participation of Mobile Energy Storage Systems (MESS) in the electricity market can not only increase its own profit but also alleviate power transmission congestion and increase market clearing balance. However, relevant market trading strategies have yet to be explored. Accordingly, this paper proposes a resilient market bidding strategy for MESS considering the operation of transportation network. Firstly, this paper proposes a joint optimization framework of energy and transportation systems. In this framework, the upper layer is to make decisions on the space-time distribution and bidding strategy of MESS, and the lower layers is designed for the equilibrium of the transportation network and electricity market clearing. Subsequently, for the newly introduced transportation layer, this paper proposes a Logit-type Robust Stochastic User Equilibrium (LRSUE) to calculate the uncertain transfer time of MESS in the transportation network. Further, based on strong duality theory and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Conditions (KKT) conditions, the two-layer model can achieve an efficient solution. Finally, two cases were provided to validate the proposed methods, demonstrating that MESS increase its revenue, alleviate power transmission congestion, and increase the electricity market clearing balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Kaijie & Ma, Yuncong & Wei, Fanrong & Lin, Xiangning & Li, Zhengtian & Dawoud, Samir Mohammed, 2025. "Resilient market bidding strategy for Mobile energy storage system considering transfer uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pc:s0306261924018816
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924018816
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Watling, David, 2006. "User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1539-1556, December.
    2. Tao, Ye & Huang, Miaohua & Chen, Yupu & Yang, Lan, 2020. "Orderly charging strategy of battery electric vehicle driven by real-world driving data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. MERCHANT, Deepak K. & NEMHAUSER, George L., 1978. "A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 346, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yang & Li, Yuanyuan & Hu, Lu, 2018. "Departure time and route choices in bottleneck equilibrium under risk and ambiguity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 774-793.
    2. Moore, II, James E. & Kim, Geunyoung & Cho, Seongdil & Hu, Hsi-hwa & Xu, Rong, 1997. "Evaluating System ATMIS Technologies Via Rapid Estimation Of Network Flows: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5c70f3d9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Zhang, Chengquan & Kitamura, Hiroshi & Goto, Mika, 2024. "Feasibility of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation in Japan: A regional analysis of the electricity supply and demand adjustment market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Wang, Yuanyuan & Chi, Yuanying & Xu, Jin-Hua & Yuan, Yongke, 2022. "Consumers’ attitudes and their effects on electric vehicle sales and charging infrastructure construction: An empirical study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Fatemeh Nourmohammadi & Mohammadhadi Mansourianfar & Sajjad Shafiei & Ziyuan Gu & Meead Saberi, 2021. "An Open GMNS Dataset of a Dynamic Multi-Modal Transportation Network Model of Melbourne, Australia," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, February.
    6. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Hemant Gehlot & Arif M. Sadri & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2019. "Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2419-2440, December.
    8. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Watling, David P., 2015. "On multi-objective stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 704-717.
    9. Zhu, Feng & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2017. "Efficient and fair system states in dynamic transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 272-289.
    10. Bhoopalam, Anirudh Kishore & Agatz, Niels & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2018. "Planning of truck platoons: A literature review and directions for future research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 212-228.
    11. Shao, Hu & Lam, William H.K. & Sumalee, Agachai & Chen, Anthony & Hazelton, Martin L., 2014. "Estimation of mean and covariance of peak hour origin–destination demands from day-to-day traffic counts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 52-75.
    12. Anna Nagurney & Ding Zhang, "undated". "Massively Parallel Computation of Dynamic Traffic Problems Modeled as Projected Dynamical Systems," Computing in Economics and Finance 1996 _039, Society for Computational Economics.
    13. Lam, William H.K. & Shao, Hu & Sumalee, Agachai, 2008. "Modeling impacts of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 890-910, December.
    14. Li, Manzi & Jiang, Gege & Lo, Hong K., 2022. "Pricing strategy of ride-sourcing services under travel time variability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Li, Xue-yan & Li, Xue-mei & Yang, Lingrun & Li, Jing, 2018. "Dynamic route and departure time choice model based on self-adaptive reference point and reinforcement learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 77-92.
    16. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2006. "A composite traffic flow modeling approach for incident-responsive network traffic assignment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 461-478.
    17. Goliszek Sławomir, 2022. "The potential accessibility to workplaces and working-age population by means of public and private car transport in Szczecin," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 31-41, January.
    18. Lam, William H. K. & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1995. "Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 243-259, August.
    19. Berliant, Marcus, 2017. "Commuting and internet traffic congestion," MPRA Paper 77378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pc:s0306261924018816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.