IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v376y2024ipbs030626192401657x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to choose mobile energy storage or fixed energy storage in high proportion renewable energy scenarios: Evidence in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Jie
  • Liu, Shan
  • Yan, Yamin
  • Liu, Yongqian
  • Han, Shuang
  • Zhang, Haoran

Abstract

With the large-scale integration of renewable energy and changes in load characteristics, the power system is facing challenges of volatility and instability. Therefore, enhancing the safe and stable operation capability of the power system is an urgent problem that needs to be solved. Mobile energy storage can improve system flexibility, stability, and regional connectivity, and has the potential to serve as a supplement or even substitute for fixed energy storage in the future. However, there are few studies that comprehensively evaluate the operational performance and economy of fixed and mobile energy storage systems. To comprehensively evaluate the economic benefits of large-scale mobile energy storage systems, this paper constructs an overall horizontal cost model for energy storage systems that considers the power system and train transportation system. This model not only introduces the traditional concept of lifecycle cost of energy storage systems, but also considers the costs of traditional transmission lines and battery transportation. Secondly, to achieve simulation of large-scale mobile energy storage system planning and operation, this paper establishes a multi-region power planning and operation simulation (MPO) model and a battery transportation and logistics (BTL) model to accurately reflect the operation mode of fixed energy storage and mobile energy storage in the power system. Finally, taking the actual power grids and railway networks in Northeast and North China as case studies, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the technical, economic, and environmental performance of large fixed and mobile energy storage systems, and conducts a detailed comparison. The research results indicate that under high grid connection ratios (using 75% and 66% as examples), the overall cost of mobile energy storage systems continues to decrease to 1.42 CNY/kWh and 0.98 CNY/kWh. Compared to fixed energy storage at 5.45 CNY/kWh and 4.79 CNY/kWh, it has an absolute economic advantage and shows significant carbon reduction capabilities, reaching 241,800 to 1,394,600 tons. This discovery fully confirms the enormous potential and application value of mobile energy storage in high proportion renewable energy scenarios, providing strong technical support and economic analysis basis for the sustainable development of the power system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Jie & Liu, Shan & Yan, Yamin & Liu, Yongqian & Han, Shuang & Zhang, Haoran, 2024. "How to choose mobile energy storage or fixed energy storage in high proportion renewable energy scenarios: Evidence in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:376:y:2024:i:pb:s030626192401657x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192401657X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:376:y:2024:i:pb:s030626192401657x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.