IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v340y2023ics0306261923004014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • He, Li
  • Feng, Hushen
  • Luo, Pengfei
  • Luo, Yugeng
  • Xu, Yang

Abstract

Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Li & Feng, Hushen & Luo, Pengfei & Luo, Yugeng & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:340:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923004014
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923004014
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry Mays, 2013. "Groundwater Resources Sustainability: Past, Present, and Future," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(13), pages 4409-4424, October.
    2. Chen, Yizhong & Li, Jing & Lu, Hongwei & Yang, Yiyang, 2020. "Impact of unconventional natural gas development on regional water resources and market supply in China from the perspective of game analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Whitmarsh, Lorraine & Nash, Nick & Upham, Paul & Lloyd, Alyson & Verdon, James P. & Kendall, J.-Michael, 2015. "UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 419-430.
    4. Weber, Jeremy G., 2012. "The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1580-1588.
    5. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    6. Gillian Foster, 2018. "Ethylene Supply in a Fluid Context: Implications of Shale Gas and Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Tom Gleeson & Yoshihide Wada & Marc F. P. Bierkens & Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, 2012. "Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7410), pages 197-200, August.
    8. Calderón, Andrés J. & Guerra, Omar J. & Papageorgiou, Lazaros G. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2018. "Disclosing water-energy-economics nexus in shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 710-731.
    9. Saeed Hadian & Kaveh Madani, 2013. "The Water Demand of Energy: Implications for Sustainable Energy Policy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Carole Dalin & Yoshihide Wada & Thomas Kastner & Michael J. Puma, 2017. "Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7647), pages 700-704, March.
    11. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    12. Guo, Meiyu & Lu, Xi & Nielsen, Chris P. & McElroy, Michael B. & Shi, Wenrui & Chen, Yuntian & Xu, Yuan, 2016. "Prospects for shale gas production in China: Implications for water demand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 742-750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Bingyuan & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Shangfei & Chen, Shilin & Zhao, Changlong & Gong, Jing, 2020. "Optimal planning and modular infrastructure dynamic allocation for shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Liuyang Yao & Qian Zhang & Kin Keung Lai & Xianyu Cao, 2020. "Explaining Local Residents’ Attitudes toward Shale Gas Exploitation: The Mediating Roles of Risk and Benefit Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Jayanta Das & A. T. M. Sakiur Rahman & Tapash Mandal & Piu Saha, 2021. "Exploring driving forces of large-scale unsustainable groundwater development for irrigation in lower Ganga River basin in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7289-7309, May.
    4. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    6. Xia Wu & Jun Xia & Baoshan Guan & Xinming Yan & Lei Zou & Ping Liu & Lifeng Yang & Si Hong & Sheng Hu, 2019. "Water Availability Assessment of Shale Gas Production in the Weiyuan Play, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Zou, Youqin & Yang, Changbing & Wu, Daishe & Yan, Chun & Zeng, Masun & Lan, Yingying & Dai, Zhenxue, 2016. "Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 185-195.
    8. Cody R. Saville & Gretchen R. Miller & Kelly Brumbelow, 2016. "Using Envision to Assess the Sustainability of Groundwater Infrastructure: A Case Study of the Twin Oaks Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Zexi Shen & Qiang Zhang & Vijay P. Singh & Yadu Pokhrel & Jianping Li & Chong-Yu Xu & Wenhuan Wu, 2022. "Drying in the low-latitude Atlantic Ocean contributed to terrestrial water storage depletion across Eurasia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Wang, Yan & Zhong, Dong-Liang & Li, Zheng & Li, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Application of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide semi-clathrate hydrate for CO2 capture from unconventional natural gases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Li, Boying & Zheng, Mingbo & Zhao, Xinxin & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2021. "An assessment of the effect of partisan ideology on shale gas production and the implications for environmental regulations," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(3).
    12. Aba, Michael M. & Parente, Virginia & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2022. "Estimation of water demand of the three major Brazilian shale-gas basins: Implications for water availability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Nicostrato Perez & Vartika Singh & Claudia Ringler & Hua Xie & Tingju Zhu & Edwin H. Sutanudjaja & Karen G. Villholth, 2024. "Ending groundwater overdraft without affecting food security," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1007-1017, August.
    14. Li, Jing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Wenyang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Kun & Luo, Jia & Yu, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of energetic heterogeneity on gas adsorption and gas storage in geologic shale systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Roohollah Noori & Mohsen Maghrebi & Søren Jessen & Sayed M. Bateni & Essam Heggy & Saman Javadi & Mojtaba Noury & Severin Pistre & Soroush Abolfathi & Amir AghaKouchak, 2023. "Decline in Iran’s groundwater recharge," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Yang, Run & Liu, Xiangui & Yu, Rongze & Hu, Zhiming & Duan, Xianggang, 2022. "Long short-term memory suggests a model for predicting shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    17. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    18. Weige Han & Zhendong Cui & Zhengguo Zhu, 2021. "The Effect of Perforation Spacing on the Variation of Stress Shadow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Feng, Gary & Jin, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Huang, Yanbo, 2024. "The role of changing land use and irrigation scheduling in groundwater depletion mitigation in a humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    20. Evensen, Darrick & Stedman, Rich, 2017. "Beliefs about impacts matter little for attitudes on shale gas development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 10-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:340:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923004014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.