IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v337y2023ics0306261923002441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporation of market signals for the optimal design of post combustion carbon capture systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tumbalam Gooty, Radhakrishna
  • Ghouse, Jaffer
  • Le, Quang Minh
  • Thitakamol, Bhurisa
  • Rezaei, Sabereh
  • Obiang, Denis
  • Gupta, Raghubir
  • Zhou, James
  • Bhattacharyya, Debangsu
  • Miller, David C.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that fossil generators equipped with post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) systems are needed to reduce the cost of deep decarbonization. Such generators need to be flexible and responsive to grid conditions, particularly in a high variable renewable energy (VRE) environment. In this work, we evaluate the net present value (NPV) of retrofitting an existing natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) unit with a flexible PCC system while incorporating market signals from a high VRE grid. We use our industrial partner’s NGCC configuration as representative of existing NGCC units and Svante’s rapid-temperature swing adsorption (TSA) for PCC. Because of its ability to rapidly startup/shutdown and ramp-up/ramp-down, the chosen capture technology is very attractive for load-following operations. For a given set of market signals, we formulate a two-stage stochastic multi-period optimization problem, under the price-taker assumption, to simultaneously optimize the design of the capture system and operation of the entire plant. Rigorous models for the NGCC unit, PCC system, and compression system are developed using commercial process simulators and validated with either plant or vendor data. For computational tractability, we develop surrogate/reduced-order models for use in the optimization problem. The surrogate model for the NGCC plant is constructed by linearizing the rigorous dynamic model at 75% load, while data-driven nonlinear surrogate models for the capture and compression systems are constructed using simulation data from the rigorous models. The optimization problem, formulated as a mixed integer bilinear program, is implemented in the IDAES® integrated platform and solved to global optimality using Gurobi 9.5. Using this formulation, we determine the profitability of retrofitting an existing NGCC unit with the chosen capture system for multiple regions in the U.S. under two scenarios with different carbon prices. The results show that the optimal decision strongly depends on the region and on the carbon price, thereby demonstrating the importance of the inclusion of market signals in the design process.

Suggested Citation

  • Tumbalam Gooty, Radhakrishna & Ghouse, Jaffer & Le, Quang Minh & Thitakamol, Bhurisa & Rezaei, Sabereh & Obiang, Denis & Gupta, Raghubir & Zhou, James & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Miller, David C., 2023. "Incorporation of market signals for the optimal design of post combustion carbon capture systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:337:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923002441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923002441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Knueven & James Ostrowski & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 857-876, October.
    2. Mills, Andrew D. & Levin, Todd & Wiser, Ryan & Seel, Joachim & Botterud, Audun, 2020. "Impacts of variable renewable energy on wholesale markets and generating assets in the United States: A review of expectations and evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Samer Takriti & Benedikt Krasenbrink & Lilian S.-Y. Wu, 2000. "Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 268-280, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arwa, Erick O. & Schell, Kristen R., 2024. "Batteries or silos: Optimizing storage capacity in direct air capture plants to maximize renewable energy use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Pan & Ming Zhao & Chung-Lun Li & Feng Qiu, 2022. "A Polyhedral Study on Fuel-Constrained Unit Commitment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3309-3324, November.
    2. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    3. Athanasios Ioannis Arvanitidis & Vivek Agarwal & Miltiadis Alamaniotis, 2023. "Nuclear-Driven Integrated Energy Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    5. Merrick, James H. & Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2024. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Aliakbari Sani, Sajad & Bahn, Olivier & Delage, Erick, 2022. "Affine decision rule approximation to address demand response uncertainty in smart Grids’ capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 438-455.
    7. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    8. Cabello-López, Tomás & Carranza-García, Manuel & Riquelme, José C. & García-Gutiérrez, Jorge, 2023. "Forecasting solar energy production in Spain: A comparison of univariate and multivariate models at the national level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    9. Ying-Yi Hong & Gerard Francesco DG. Apolinario, 2021. "Uncertainty in Unit Commitment in Power Systems: A Review of Models, Methods, and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-47, October.
    10. Philip J. Neame & Andrew B. Philpott & Geoffrey Pritchard, 2003. "Offer Stack Optimization in Electricity Pool Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 397-408, June.
    11. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Chyong, Chi Kong & Newbery, David, 2022. "A unit commitment and economic dispatch model of the GB electricity market – Formulation and application to hydro pumped storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    14. Matt Thompson, 2013. "Optimal Economic Dispatch and Risk Management of Thermal Power Plants in Deregulated Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 791-809, August.
    15. Kjetil Haugen & Stein Wallace, 2006. "Stochastic programming: Potential hazards when random variables reflect market interaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 119-127, February.
    16. Panagiotis Andrianesis & Dimitris Bertsimas & Michael C. Caramanis & William W. Hogan, 2020. "Computation of Convex Hull Prices in Electricity Markets with Non-Convexities using Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition," Papers 2012.13331, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    17. Máximo A. Domínguez-Garabitos & Víctor S. Ocaña-Guevara & Félix Santos-García & Adriana Arango-Manrique & Miguel Aybar-Mejía, 2022. "A Methodological Proposal for Implementing Demand-Shifting Strategies in the Wholesale Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    18. O'Shaughnessy, Eric & Heeter, Jenny & Shah, Chandra & Koebrich, Sam, 2021. "Corporate acceleration of the renewable energy transition and implications for electric grids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. O’Malley, Cormac & de Mars, Patrick & Badesa, Luis & Strbac, Goran, 2023. "Reinforcement learning and mixed-integer programming for power plant scheduling in low carbon systems: Comparison and hybridisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    20. Jirutitijaroen, Panida & Kim, Sujin & Kittithreerapronchai, Oran & Prina, José, 2013. "An optimization model for natural gas supply portfolios of a power generation company," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:337:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923002441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.