IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v317y2022ics0306261922005220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The study of heat-mass transfer characteristics and multi-objective optimization on electric arc furnace

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xuan-Kai
  • He, Ya-Ling
  • Li, Meng-Jie
  • Hu, Xin

Abstract

It is crucial to reveal the energy conversion and heat and mass transfer characteristics in the electric arc furnaces (EAFs). In this paper, a transient mathematical model was built to adequately capture the distribution of multi-physical fields in EAF. The numerical modeling method was verified against brown corundum smelting experiment data. In addition, the influence on the brawn corundum smelting process of the typical operating parameters has been examined, and the major problems which limit the performance improvement of smelting were analyzed. Moreover, four indicators were proposed to comprehensively evaluate the EAF performance, consisting of liquid volume fraction β, energy efficiency η, temperature rise index ς, and temperature uniformity index ξ. Furthermore, the optimal combination of operating parameters was selected automatically based on the back propagation (BP) neural network predicting model and non-domestic sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). The results showed that the local overheating phenomenon is serious and that homogenizing the energy distribution in the furnace is the key to improving the melting performance. Increasing electrode immersion and voltage can significantly increase the rate of heat and mass transfer. In the case of ψ = 0.75, υ = 0.6, when χ is increased from 0.2 to 0.6, τmax is shortened by 13.3% and ηmax is increased by 12.0%. While with ψ = 0.75 and χ = 0.4, τmax is reduced by 36.0% when υ increases from 0.2 to 1.0, but ηmax is also decreased by 7.0%. It was found that decreasing the height diameter ratio will improve the overall EAF smelting performance, but it also increases the area of heat loss. In the case of χ = 0.4, υ = 0.6, ξave and ηmax improved by 3.1 and 14.5%, respectively, when ψ decreases from 1.0 to 0.5. The EAF performances are considerably enhanced in comparison to the operating basic parameters (ψ = 0.75, χ = 0.4 and υ = 0.6), subject to optimal operation parameters (ψ = 0.61, χ = 0.59 and υ = 0.59). In this case, τmax and ςmax reduced by 6.2 and 4.1%, respectively, while ηmax and ξave increased by 6.8 and 1.0%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xuan-Kai & He, Ya-Ling & Li, Meng-Jie & Hu, Xin, 2022. "The study of heat-mass transfer characteristics and multi-objective optimization on electric arc furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:317:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005220
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922005220
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Ming-Jia & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2017. "Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 203-215.
    2. Kirschen, Marcus & Risonarta, Victor & Pfeifer, Herbert, 2009. "Energy efficiency and the influence of gas burners to the energy related carbon dioxide emissions of electric arc furnaces in steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1065-1072.
    3. Lotfan, S. & Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour & Fallah, M. & Sadeghi, M.H., 2016. "ANN-based modeling and reducing dual-fuel engine’s challenging emissions by multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 91-99.
    4. An, Runying & Yu, Biying & Li, Ru & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 862-880.
    5. Xu, Yang & Ren, Qinlong & Zheng, Zhang-Jing & He, Ya-Ling, 2017. "Evaluation and optimization of melting performance for a latent heat thermal energy storage unit partially filled with porous media," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 84-95.
    6. Jiang, Han & Xi, Zhongli & A. Rahman, Anas & Zhang, Xiaoqing, 2020. "Prediction of output power with artificial neural network using extended datasets for Stirling engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Wei, Li & Yan, Fuwu & Hu, Jie & Xi, Guangwei & Liu, Bo & Zeng, Jiawei, 2017. "Nox conversion efficiency optimization based on NSGA-II and state-feedback nonlinear model predictive control of selective catalytic reduction system in diesel engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 959-971.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yang & Li, Ming-Jia & Zheng, Zhang-Jing & Xue, Xiao-Dai, 2018. "Melting performance enhancement of phase change material by a limited amount of metal foam: Configurational optimization and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 868-880.
    2. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Xue, Xiao-Dai & Du, Bao-Cun, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of the aiming strategy for the solar power tower with a cavity receiver by using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 399-416.
    3. Li, Lu & Sun, Jie & Li, Yinshi & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Haojie, 2019. "Transient characteristics of a parabolic trough direct-steam-generation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 800-810.
    4. Zheng, Zhang-Jing & Xu, Yang & Li, Ming-Jia, 2018. "Eccentricity optimization of a horizontal shell-and-tube latent-heat thermal energy storage unit based on melting and melting-solidifying performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 447-454.
    5. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    6. Li, Ming-Jia & Jin, Bo & Ma, Zhao & Yuan, Fan, 2018. "Experimental and numerical study on the performance of a new high-temperature packed-bed thermal energy storage system with macroencapsulation of molten salt phase change material," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Bhowmik, Subrata & Paul, Abhishek & Panua, Rajsekhar & Ghosh, Subrata Kumar, 2020. "Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with diesel-kerosene-ethanol: A multi-objective optimization study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Wang, Zhipeng & Ning, Zhengfu & Guo, Wenting & Zhan, Jie & Zhang, Yuanxin, 2024. "Study of fracture monitoring and heat extraction evaluation in geothermal reservoir modified by abandoned well pattern: Numerical models and case studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    9. Surywanshi, Gajanan Dattarao & Patnaikuni, Venkata Suresh & Vooradi, Ramsagar & Anne, Sarath Babu, 2021. "4-E and life cycle analyses of a supercritical coal direct chemical looping combustion power plant with hydrogen and power co-generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Li, Meng-Jie & Qiu, Yu & Li, Ming-Jia, 2018. "Cyclic thermal performance analysis of a traditional Single-Layered and of a novel Multi-Layered Packed-Bed molten salt Thermocline Tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 565-578.
    11. Xinguo Sun & Jasim M. Mahdi & Hayder I. Mohammed & Hasan Sh. Majdi & Wang Zixiong & Pouyan Talebizadehsardari, 2021. "Solidification Enhancement in a Triple-Tube Latent Heat Energy Storage System Using Twisted Fins," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Li, Xi & Yu, Biying, 2019. "Peaking CO2 emissions for China's urban passenger transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Yang, Honghua & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng, 2023. "Tracing China's steel use from steel flows in the production system to steel footprints in the consumption system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Mohamed Elhefnawy & Ahmed Ragab & Mohamed-Salah Ouali, 2023. "Polygon generation and video-to-video translation for time-series prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 261-279, January.
    15. Hemmatabady, Hoofar & Welsch, Bastian & Formhals, Julian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "AI-based enviro-economic optimization of solar-coupled and standalone geothermal systems for heating and cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    16. Shahsavar, Amin & Al-Rashed, Abdullah A.A.A. & Entezari, Sajad & Sardari, Pouyan Talebizadeh, 2019. "Melting and solidification characteristics of a double-pipe latent heat storage system with sinusoidal wavy channels embedded in a porous medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 751-769.
    17. Wang, Jinling & Tian, Yebing & Hu, Xintao & Han, Jinguo & Liu, Bing, 2023. "Integrated assessment and optimization of dual environment and production drivers in grinding," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Yang, Jian & Cheng, Rijin, 2021. "New technology for producing high-quality combustible gas by high-temperature reaction of dust-removal coke powder in mixed atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Qiu, Hao & Wang, Kai & Yu, Peifeng & Ni, Mingjiang & Xiao, Gang, 2021. "A third-order numerical model and transient characterization of a β-type Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Zeng, Zhichen & Ni, Dong & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "Real-time heliostat field aiming strategy optimization based on reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:317:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.