IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v256y2019ics0306261919315946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of energy losses in low voltage distribution grids with high penetration of distributed generation

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Chenjie
  • Menke, Jan-Hendrik
  • Dasenbrock, Johannes
  • Braun, Martin
  • Haslbeck, Matthias
  • Schmid, Karl-Heinz

Abstract

The transition of the conventional energy supply scheme, typically characterized by integration of more small-scale renewable sources and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, is an inevitable trend. At the same time, efficient operation of the existing distribution system, which hosts these decentralized generators, is equally important toward achieving a sustainable energy system. In order to keep track of the upcoming changes regarding system efficiency, an accurate determination of grid losses in the distribution system is the fundamental step. However, to evaluate the energy losses of power distribution grids at large scales is a difficult task. Currently, distribution system operators only have limited options for determining grid losses, especially in the low voltage sector. The growing installation rate and the fluctuating nature of distributed generations pose further difficulties and uncertainties for the loss evaluations. For this reason, a comprehensive and accurate evaluation on grid losses, which takes the grid information, the available metering data and the installed distributed generations into account, is highly relevant. In this work, a novel evaluation framework for energy losses for low voltage distribution grids is presented. Our evaluation framework consists of three building blocks: a fully automatic and parallelized generation of grid models, the determination of grid losses based on annual power flow simulations as well as a data-driven reference grid modeling method. We demonstrate and validate this framework based on a data-set of 5000 real distribution grids (including about 31,000 low voltage feeders), located in the service area of one of the largest German distribution system operators. The key contribution of the proposed framework is the automatic approach for grid modeling and feature evaluation at large scales and the implementation of the advanced, comprehensive reference grid modeling method for evaluating relevant grid features and estimating grid losses. This novel reference grid modeling approach and the complete framework are further validated by comparison with both exhaustive simulation results of grid losses and three state-of-the-art regression schemes. Among the case studies, this proposed evaluation framework shows a very good performance in the evaluation of grid losses. Moreover, this evaluation framework provides useful insights concerning the allocation of energy losses as well as the impact of distributed generations on grid losses. Accordingly, this novel evaluation framework gives distribution system operators a powerful tool considering the evaluation and improvement of system efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Chenjie & Menke, Jan-Hendrik & Dasenbrock, Johannes & Braun, Martin & Haslbeck, Matthias & Schmid, Karl-Heinz, 2019. "Evaluation of energy losses in low voltage distribution grids with high penetration of distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:256:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919315946
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919315946
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoît Bletterie & Serdar Kadam & Herwig Renner, 2018. "On the Classification of Low Voltage Feeders for Network Planning and Hosting Capacity Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Saeh, I.S. & Mustafa, M.W. & Mohammed, Y.S. & Almaktar, M., 2016. "Static Security classification and Evaluation classifier design in electric power grid with presence of PV power plants using C-4.5," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 283-290.
    3. Ma, Chenjie & Dasenbrock, Johannes & Töbermann, J.-Christian & Braun, Martin, 2019. "A novel indicator for evaluation of the impact of distributed generations on the energy losses of low voltage distribution grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 674-683.
    4. Kalambe, Shilpa & Agnihotri, Ganga, 2014. "Loss minimization techniques used in distribution network: bibliographical survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 184-200.
    5. Shouxiang Wang & Pengfei Dong & Yingjie Tian, 2017. "A Novel Method of Statistical Line Loss Estimation for Distribution Feeders Based on Feeder Cluster and Modified XGBoost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Bair, Eric & Hastie, Trevor & Paul, Debashis & Tibshirani, Robert, 2006. "Prediction by Supervised Principal Components," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 119-137, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A.S. Jameel Hassan & Umar Marikkar & G.W. Kasun Prabhath & Aranee Balachandran & W.G. Chaminda Bandara & Parakrama B. Ekanayake & Roshan I. Godaliyadda & Janaka B. Ekanayake, 2021. "A Sensitivity Matrix Approach Using Two-Stage Optimization for Voltage Regulation of LV Networks with High PV Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Daniel Lohmeier & Dennis Cronbach & Simon Ruben Drauz & Martin Braun & Tanja Manuela Kneiske, 2020. "Pandapipes: An Open-Source Piping Grid Calculation Package for Multi-Energy Grid Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-39, November.
    3. Hasan Eroğlu, 2022. "Development of a novel solar energy need index for identifying priority investment regions: a case study and current status in Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8840-8855, June.
    4. Felipe Moraes do Nascimento & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk & Fernando de Souza Savian & Taís Bisognin Garlet & José Renes Pinheiro & Carlos Ramos, 2020. "Factors for Measuring Photovoltaic Adoption from the Perspective of Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A.S. Jameel Hassan & Umar Marikkar & G.W. Kasun Prabhath & Aranee Balachandran & W.G. Chaminda Bandara & Parakrama B. Ekanayake & Roshan I. Godaliyadda & Janaka B. Ekanayake, 2021. "A Sensitivity Matrix Approach Using Two-Stage Optimization for Voltage Regulation of LV Networks with High PV Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Kui Shen & Nan Song & Youngchul Kim & Chunqiao Tian & Shara D Rice & Michael J Gabrin & W Fraser Symmans & Lajos Pusztai & Jae K Lee, 2012. "A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Gene Predictors for the Pathological Response of Breast Cancer Patients to Chemotherapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Caroline Jardet & Baptiste Meunier, 2022. "Nowcasting world GDP growth with high‐frequency data," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1181-1200, September.
    4. Min Cai & Hui Dai & Yongyong Qiu & Yang Zhao & Ruyang Zhang & Minjie Chu & Juncheng Dai & Zhibin Hu & Hongbing Shen & Feng Chen, 2013. "SNP Set Association Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Sultana, U. & Khairuddin, Azhar B. & Aman, M.M. & Mokhtar, A.S. & Zareen, N., 2016. "A review of optimum DG placement based on minimization of power losses and voltage stability enhancement of distribution system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-378.
    6. Cem Cakmakli & Dick van Dijk, 2010. "Getting the Most out of Macroeconomic Information for Predicting Stock Returns and Volatility," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-115/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. Hatem Jemmali & Mohamed Salah Matoussi, 2012. "A Multidimensional Analysis of Water Poverty at A Local Scale- Application of Improved Water Poverty Index for Tunisia," Working Papers 730, Economic Research Forum, revised 2012.
    8. Myoungsoo Kim & Wonik Choi & Youngjun Jeon & Ling Liu, 2019. "A Hybrid Neural Network Model for Power Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Tobias Rösch & Peter Treffinger & Barbara Koch, 2020. "Remuneration of Distribution Grids for Enhanced Regenerative Electricity Deployment—An Analysis and Model for the Analysis of Grid Structures in Southern Germany Using Linear Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Yanbin Li & Feng Zhang & Yun Li & Bingkang Li & Zhen Li, 2019. "Evaluating the Power Grid Investment Behavior in China: From the Perspective of Government Supervision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Khuram Shahzad & Akif Zia Khan & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2017. "Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-47, April.
    12. Anish Agarwal & Keegan Harris & Justin Whitehouse & Zhiwei Steven Wu, 2023. "Adaptive Principal Component Regression with Applications to Panel Data," Papers 2307.01357, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    13. Luke Hartigan & Tom Rosewall, 2024. "Nowcasting Quarterly GDP Growth during the COVID-19 Crisis Using a Monthly Activity Indicator," Working Papers 2024-15, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    14. Cheng, Cheng, 2009. "Internal validation inferences of significant genomic features in genome-wide screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 788-800, January.
    15. Seungchul Baek & Yen‐Yi Ho & Yanyuan Ma, 2020. "Using sufficient direction factor model to analyze latent activities associated with breast cancer survival," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1340-1350, December.
    16. Yu Takagi & Hirokazu Matsuda & Yukio Taniguchi & Hiroaki Iwaisaki, 2014. "Predicting the Phenotypic Values of Physiological Traits Using SNP Genotype and Gene Expression Data in Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Luis A. Barboza & Julien Emile-Geay & Bo Li & Wan He, 2019. "Efficient Reconstructions of Common Era Climate via Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 535-554, September.
    18. Kitlinski, Tobias & an de Meulen, Philipp, 2015. "The role of targeted predictors for nowcasting GDP with bridge models: Application to the Euro area," Ruhr Economic Papers 559, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    19. Jialing Huang & Yihang Li & Yu Shi & Lihong Wang & Qing Zhou & Xiaohua Huang, 2019. "Effects of nutrient level and planting density on population relationship in soybean and wheat intercropping populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Kun Li & Junsan Zhao & Yilin Lin, 2023. "Debris-flow susceptibility assessment in Dongchuan using stacking ensemble learning including multiple heterogeneous learners with RFE for factor optimization," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2477-2511, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:256:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919315946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.