IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v238y2019icp1126-1137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moore vs. Murphy: Tradeoffs between complexity and reliability in distributed energy system scheduling using software-as-a-service

Author

Listed:
  • Dutton, Spencer
  • Marnay, Chris
  • Feng, Wei
  • Robinson, Matthew
  • Mammoli, Andrea

Abstract

Software-based optimization of building control strategies, including scheduling, has the potential to improve the performance of existing complex heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), storage, and other systems—especially if temporally variable energy production, such as solar thermal or photovoltaics, is included. If reductions in energy bills can be achieved using optimized control strategies that take advantage of cost-saving opportunities, such as time-of-use pricing, the additional bill savings can cover further efficiency investment costs. As computer processing becomes cheaper over time (Moore’s Law), opportunities to perform complex control optimization become more abundant, and these can be performed remotely as software-as-a-service (SaaS). However, by “perfecting” our control strategies, we run an increased risk that when something unexpected happens (Murphy’s Law), the consequences of failure are greater. This study used simulation to explore the potential benefits of HVAC schedule optimization, delivery, and implementation using a SaaS paradigm, at various levels of complexity. Implementing optimal schedules in a model of an efficient building’s HVAC system, the study predicts energy cost savings of up to 10% compared to the naïve reference control strategy. Optimizing more system control variables increases the potential energy cost savings; however, these savings could be compromised by failures in communication inherent in delivering schedules via SaaS. The additional cost of energy resulting from the risk of increased demand charges generally increased with increased communication failure to a much larger extent than the risk of increased energy use charges. This work suggests that moderate improvements in performance, achieved at low cost by simple means, may be more effective than highly optimized schemes, which are more susceptible to failure due to their dependence on complex interactions between systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dutton, Spencer & Marnay, Chris & Feng, Wei & Robinson, Matthew & Mammoli, Andrea, 2019. "Moore vs. Murphy: Tradeoffs between complexity and reliability in distributed energy system scheduling using software-as-a-service," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1126-1137.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:238:y:2019:i:c:p:1126-1137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919300650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Menglian & Wang, Xinhao & Meinrenken, Christoph J. & Ding, Yi, 2018. "Economic and environmental benefits of coordinating dispatch among distributed electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 842-855.
    2. Quashie, Mike & Marnay, Chris & Bouffard, François & Joós, Géza, 2018. "Optimal planning of microgrid power and operating reserve capacity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1229-1236.
    3. Nemati, Mohsen & Braun, Martin & Tenbohlen, Stefan, 2018. "Optimization of unit commitment and economic dispatch in microgrids based on genetic algorithm and mixed integer linear programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 944-963.
    4. Stadler, M. & Kloess, M. & Groissböck, M. & Cardoso, G. & Sharma, R. & Bozchalui, M.C. & Marnay, C., 2013. "Electric storage in California’s commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 711-722.
    5. DeForest, Nicholas & MacDonald, Jason S. & Black, Douglas R., 2018. "Day ahead optimization of an electric vehicle fleet providing ancillary services in the Los Angeles Air Force Base vehicle-to-grid demonstration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 987-1001.
    6. Beckman, William A. & Broman, Lars & Fiksel, Alex & Klein, Sanford A. & Lindberg, Eva & Schuler, Mattias & Thornton, Jeff, 1994. "TRNSYS The most complete solar energy system modeling and simulation software," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 486-488.
    7. Jin, Ming & Feng, Wei & Marnay, Chris & Spanos, Costas, 2018. "Microgrid to enable optimal distributed energy retail and end-user demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1321-1335.
    8. Jin, Ming & Feng, Wei & Liu, Ping & Marnay, Chris & Spanos, Costas, 2017. "MOD-DR: Microgrid optimal dispatch with demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 758-776.
    9. Koeppel, Gaudenz & Andersson, Göran, 2009. "Reliability modeling of multi-carrier energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 235-244.
    10. Manur, Ashray & Venkataramanan, Giri & Sehloff, David, 2018. "Simple electric utility platform: A hardware/software solution for operating emergent microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 748-763.
    11. Mehdizadeh, Ali & Taghizadegan, Navid & Salehi, Javad, 2018. "Risk-based energy management of renewable-based microgrid using information gap decision theory in the presence of peak load management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 617-630.
    12. Li, Yang & Feng, Bo & Li, Guoqing & Qi, Junjian & Zhao, Dongbo & Mu, Yunfei, 2018. "Optimal distributed generation planning in active distribution networks considering integration of energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1073-1081.
    13. DeForest, Nicholas & Mendes, Gonçalo & Stadler, Michael & Feng, Wei & Lai, Judy & Marnay, Chris, 2014. "Optimal deployment of thermal energy storage under diverse economic and climate conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 488-496.
    14. Gao, Dian-ce & Sun, Yongjun & Lu, Yuehong, 2015. "A robust demand response control of commercial buildings for smart grid under load prediction uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 275-283.
    15. Steen, David & Stadler, Michael & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Groissböck, Markus & DeForest, Nicholas & Marnay, Chris, 2015. "Modeling of thermal storage systems in MILP distributed energy resource models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 782-792.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Chu & Ali, Syed Qaseem & Joos, Geza & Paquin, Jean-Nicolas & Montenegro, Juan Felipe Patarroyo, 2023. "Design and CHIL testing of microgrid controller with general rule-based dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    2. Chen, Changming & Wu, Xueyan & Li, Yan & Zhu, Xiaojun & Li, Zesen & Ma, Jien & Qiu, Weiqiang & Liu, Chang & Lin, Zhenzhi & Yang, Li & Wang, Qin & Ding, Yi, 2021. "Distributionally robust day-ahead scheduling of park-level integrated energy system considering generalized energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    3. Hannah Mareike Marczinkowski & Luísa Barros, 2020. "Technical Approaches and Institutional Alignment to 100% Renewable Energy System Transition of Madeira Island—Electrification, Smart Energy and the Required Flexible Market Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Zheng, Lingwei & Zhou, Xingqiu & Qiu, Qi & Yang, Lan, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal dispatch of an integrated energy system considering time-frequency characteristics of renewable energy source output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Shahryari, E. & Shayeghi, H. & Mohammadi-ivatloo, B. & Moradzadeh, M., 2019. "A copula-based method to consider uncertainties for multi-objective energy management of microgrid in presence of demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 879-890.
    4. Razeghi, Ghazal & Gu, Fei & Neal, Russell & Samuelsen, Scott, 2018. "A generic microgrid controller: Concept, testing, and insights," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 660-671.
    5. Zhang, Tianyang & Pota, Himanshu & Chu, Chi-Cheng & Gadh, Rajit, 2018. "Real-time renewable energy incentive system for electric vehicles using prioritization and cryptocurrency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 582-594.
    6. Baeten, Brecht & Confrey, Thomas & Pecceu, Sébastien & Rogiers, Frederik & Helsen, Lieve, 2016. "A validated model for mixing and buoyancy in stratified hot water storage tanks for use in building energy simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 217-229.
    7. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Usher, John M. & Jaradat, Raed, 2018. "A collaborative energy sharing optimization model among electric vehicle charging stations, commercial buildings, and power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 841-857.
    9. Hirwa, Jusse & Zolan, Alexander & Becker, William & Flamand, Tülay & Newman, Alexandra, 2023. "Optimizing design and dispatch of a resilient renewable energy microgrid for a South African hospital," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    10. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2021. "Rate design with distributed energy resources and electric vehicles: A Californian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Konstantakopoulos, Ioannis C. & Barkan, Andrew R. & He, Shiying & Veeravalli, Tanya & Liu, Huihan & Spanos, Costas, 2019. "A deep learning and gamification approach to improving human-building interaction and energy efficiency in smart infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 810-821.
    12. Byeong-Cheol Jeong & Dong-Hwan Shin & Jae-Beom Im & Jae-Young Park & Young-Jin Kim, 2019. "Implementation of Optimal Two-Stage Scheduling of Energy Storage System Based on Big-Data-Driven Forecasting—An Actual Case Study in a Campus Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Lu, Renzhi & Hong, Seung Ho & Zhang, Xiongfeng, 2018. "A Dynamic pricing demand response algorithm for smart grid: Reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 220-230.
    14. Yang, Dongfeng & Jiang, Chao & Cai, Guowei & Yang, Deyou & Liu, Xiaojun, 2020. "Interval method based optimal planning of multi-energy microgrid with uncertain renewable generation and demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    15. Steen, David & Stadler, Michael & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Groissböck, Markus & DeForest, Nicholas & Marnay, Chris, 2015. "Modeling of thermal storage systems in MILP distributed energy resource models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 782-792.
    16. Cardoso, Gonçalo & Brouhard, Thomas & DeForest, Nicholas & Wang, Dai & Heleno, Miguel & Kotzur, Leander, 2018. "Battery aging in multi-energy microgrid design using mixed integer linear programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1059-1069.
    17. Wang, Xuan & Jin, Ming & Feng, Wei & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Liang, Youcai, 2018. "Cascade energy optimization for waste heat recovery in distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 679-695.
    18. Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Lu, Yuping & Lu, Shuai, 2019. "Optimal design and operation of multi-energy system with load aggregator considering nodal energy prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 280-295.
    19. Zhou, Yutian & Panteli, Mathaios & Moreno, Rodrigo & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2018. "System-level assessment of reliability and resilience provision from microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 374-392.
    20. Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jacob, 2018. "Optimal design of a distributed energy resource system that economically reduces carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 119-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:238:y:2019:i:c:p:1126-1137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.